税务审查员因修改意见而产生的民事和刑事影响

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
Rodrigo Alberto Plazas Estepa, Ludivia Hernandez Aros, L. Cossio, Fernando Gutiérrez Portela
{"title":"税务审查员因修改意见而产生的民事和刑事影响","authors":"Rodrigo Alberto Plazas Estepa, Ludivia Hernandez Aros, L. Cossio, Fernando Gutiérrez Portela","doi":"10.21017/rev.repub.2021.v30.a101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently in the exercise of the fiscal revision, the accountant faces different situations that affect or modify his opinion in an already disclosed report, this generates uncertainty to the interest groups, exposing himself to a legal problem of civil or criminal court. Thus, this article analyzes the civil and criminal implications incurred by the fiscal auditor for the modification of the opinion in his report. From the methodological perspective, the research is analytical. It begins with an investigation of the regulations for the exercise of the statutory review in Colombia, and then analyzes the civil and criminal implications of modifying an opinion in its ruling in accordance with the criminal code, civil code, law 43 of 1990, commercial code, and legal support.The results show that when the fiscal auditor is found to have committed fraud as a result of a change of opinion, an economic value is established that will be determined by a court ranging from 50 to 50,000 SMLV, depending on the damage caused and according to whether the conduct is punishable as intentional, negligent or premeditated, with a penalty of between one (1) and thirty (30) years in prison, depending on the damage caused to the affected stakeholders. \nDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2021.v30.a101","PeriodicalId":40477,"journal":{"name":"REVISTA REPUBLICANA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMPLICACIONES CIVILES Y PENALES EN LAS QUE INCURRE EL REVISOR FISCAL POR LA MODIFICACIÓN DE LA OPINIÓN EN SU DICTAMEN\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Alberto Plazas Estepa, Ludivia Hernandez Aros, L. Cossio, Fernando Gutiérrez Portela\",\"doi\":\"10.21017/rev.repub.2021.v30.a101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently in the exercise of the fiscal revision, the accountant faces different situations that affect or modify his opinion in an already disclosed report, this generates uncertainty to the interest groups, exposing himself to a legal problem of civil or criminal court. Thus, this article analyzes the civil and criminal implications incurred by the fiscal auditor for the modification of the opinion in his report. From the methodological perspective, the research is analytical. It begins with an investigation of the regulations for the exercise of the statutory review in Colombia, and then analyzes the civil and criminal implications of modifying an opinion in its ruling in accordance with the criminal code, civil code, law 43 of 1990, commercial code, and legal support.The results show that when the fiscal auditor is found to have committed fraud as a result of a change of opinion, an economic value is established that will be determined by a court ranging from 50 to 50,000 SMLV, depending on the damage caused and according to whether the conduct is punishable as intentional, negligent or premeditated, with a penalty of between one (1) and thirty (30) years in prison, depending on the damage caused to the affected stakeholders. \\nDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2021.v30.a101\",\"PeriodicalId\":40477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVISTA REPUBLICANA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVISTA REPUBLICANA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21017/rev.repub.2021.v30.a101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVISTA REPUBLICANA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21017/rev.repub.2021.v30.a101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,在进行财务修订时,会计师面临着影响或修改其在已披露报告中的意见的不同情况,这给利益集团带来了不确定性,使其面临民事或刑事法庭的法律问题。因此,本文分析了财政审计师因修改其报告中的意见而产生的民事和刑事影响。从方法论的角度来看,该研究是分析性的。它首先调查了哥伦比亚行使法定审查的法规,然后分析了根据《刑法》、《民法》、1990年第43号法律、《商法典》和法律支持修改其裁决中的意见所涉的民事和刑事问题。结果表明,当财政审计员因意见改变而被发现犯有欺诈行为时,法院将根据造成的损害以及该行为是否应以故意、疏忽或预谋论处,确定50至50000 SMLV的经济价值,根据对受影响的利益相关者造成的损害,可判处一(1)至三十(30)年监禁。DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2021.v30.a101
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IMPLICACIONES CIVILES Y PENALES EN LAS QUE INCURRE EL REVISOR FISCAL POR LA MODIFICACIÓN DE LA OPINIÓN EN SU DICTAMEN
Currently in the exercise of the fiscal revision, the accountant faces different situations that affect or modify his opinion in an already disclosed report, this generates uncertainty to the interest groups, exposing himself to a legal problem of civil or criminal court. Thus, this article analyzes the civil and criminal implications incurred by the fiscal auditor for the modification of the opinion in his report. From the methodological perspective, the research is analytical. It begins with an investigation of the regulations for the exercise of the statutory review in Colombia, and then analyzes the civil and criminal implications of modifying an opinion in its ruling in accordance with the criminal code, civil code, law 43 of 1990, commercial code, and legal support.The results show that when the fiscal auditor is found to have committed fraud as a result of a change of opinion, an economic value is established that will be determined by a court ranging from 50 to 50,000 SMLV, depending on the damage caused and according to whether the conduct is punishable as intentional, negligent or premeditated, with a penalty of between one (1) and thirty (30) years in prison, depending on the damage caused to the affected stakeholders. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2021.v30.a101
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: La Revista Republicana es una publicación semestral del Centro de Investigaciones de la Corporación Universitaria Republicana, institución universitaria ubicada en Bogotá D.C, Colombia. Tiene el propósito de visibilizar la producción académica de investigadores nacionales e internacionales concretada en artículos científicos que deben ser inéditos, resultado de proyectos de investigación preferiblemente terminados; en temas relacionados con el derecho y las ciencias sociales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信