新冠肺炎大流行后的在线教学实践与教育过程的有效性

IF 2.6 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS
C. Tartavulea, C. Albu, Nadia Albu, Ramona Iulia Dieaconescu, Silvia Petre
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行后的在线教学实践与教育过程的有效性","authors":"C. Tartavulea, C. Albu, Nadia Albu, Ramona Iulia Dieaconescu, Silvia Petre","doi":"10.24818/ea/2020/55/920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we investigate the impact of the abrupt switch to online teaching which occurred in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. By using responses from 362 professors and students from 13 European countries, we find that universities and students were very quick to adapt to the new changes and that a mix of synchronous and asynchronous interaction and assessment methods are currently employed. However, this mix is quite limited relative to what is usually subsumed into online learning tools, and is indicative of passive delivery and reduced interaction. Our respondents estimate that most online interaction and assessment methods will continue to be used after the return to face-to-face education. Our respondents also view the switch to online teaching to have an overall moderate positive impact on the educational process, albeit the overall effectiveness of the online educational experience is perceived to be lower than in the case of face-to-face teaching. Moreover, we find that the institutional support, the trust in the online system and the perceived effectiveness of formative assessment are factors that are positively associated with the impact and effectiveness of online education.","PeriodicalId":46837,"journal":{"name":"Amfiteatru Economic","volume":"22 1","pages":"920-920"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"104","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online Teaching Practices and the Effectiveness of the Educational Process in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"C. Tartavulea, C. Albu, Nadia Albu, Ramona Iulia Dieaconescu, Silvia Petre\",\"doi\":\"10.24818/ea/2020/55/920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we investigate the impact of the abrupt switch to online teaching which occurred in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. By using responses from 362 professors and students from 13 European countries, we find that universities and students were very quick to adapt to the new changes and that a mix of synchronous and asynchronous interaction and assessment methods are currently employed. However, this mix is quite limited relative to what is usually subsumed into online learning tools, and is indicative of passive delivery and reduced interaction. Our respondents estimate that most online interaction and assessment methods will continue to be used after the return to face-to-face education. Our respondents also view the switch to online teaching to have an overall moderate positive impact on the educational process, albeit the overall effectiveness of the online educational experience is perceived to be lower than in the case of face-to-face teaching. Moreover, we find that the institutional support, the trust in the online system and the perceived effectiveness of formative assessment are factors that are positively associated with the impact and effectiveness of online education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Amfiteatru Economic\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"920-920\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"104\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Amfiteatru Economic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24818/ea/2020/55/920\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amfiteatru Economic","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/ea/2020/55/920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 104

摘要

在本文中,我们调查了由于新冠肺炎大流行而于2020年突然转向在线教学的影响。通过使用来自13个欧洲国家的362名教授和学生的回答,我们发现大学和学生很快就适应了新的变化,并且目前采用了同步和异步的互动和评估方法。然而,相对于通常包含在在线学习工具中的内容,这种组合非常有限,并且表明被动交付和互动减少。我们的受访者估计,在恢复面对面教育后,大多数在线互动和评估方法将继续使用。我们的受访者还认为,转向在线教学对教育过程产生了总体上适度的积极影响,尽管人们认为在线教育体验的总体有效性低于面对面教学。此外,我们发现,制度支持、对在线系统的信任以及形成性评估的有效性是与在线教育的影响和有效性呈正相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online Teaching Practices and the Effectiveness of the Educational Process in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic
In this paper, we investigate the impact of the abrupt switch to online teaching which occurred in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. By using responses from 362 professors and students from 13 European countries, we find that universities and students were very quick to adapt to the new changes and that a mix of synchronous and asynchronous interaction and assessment methods are currently employed. However, this mix is quite limited relative to what is usually subsumed into online learning tools, and is indicative of passive delivery and reduced interaction. Our respondents estimate that most online interaction and assessment methods will continue to be used after the return to face-to-face education. Our respondents also view the switch to online teaching to have an overall moderate positive impact on the educational process, albeit the overall effectiveness of the online educational experience is perceived to be lower than in the case of face-to-face teaching. Moreover, we find that the institutional support, the trust in the online system and the perceived effectiveness of formative assessment are factors that are positively associated with the impact and effectiveness of online education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信