固相萃取法和管内液-液萃取法测定突尼斯Medjerda河地表水中有机磷农药的比较评价

IF 1 4区 化学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Mouna Necibi, N. Mzoughi
{"title":"固相萃取法和管内液-液萃取法测定突尼斯Medjerda河地表水中有机磷农药的比较评价","authors":"Mouna Necibi, N. Mzoughi","doi":"10.1080/10826076.2023.2222301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the present work, we develop, validate, and compare two extraction procedures (in-tube liquid-liquid extraction (ITLLE) and solid-phase extraction (SPE)). The parameters that influence extraction efficiency, the nature and volume of the extraction solvent, as well as the pH nature, were improved and a standard solution of Organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) was used. Results indicated that SPE is clearly more successful than ITLLE extraction under optimum conditions. The validated method showed that this approach had good linearity, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.991 to 0.998 and low detection and quantification limits of 0.01–0.03 ng L−1 and 0.03–0.9 ng L−1, respectively. Relative standard deviations were in the range of 0.2 and 1.2%, while extraction recoveries varied from 79 to 97%. The SPE was selected and, optimum recoveries for OPPs were obtained at pH 7, with 10 mL of ethyl acetate. The suggested approach was effectively applied to the analysis of water samples collected from the Medjerda River in two seasons. The average OPPs concentrations ranged from not detected (ND) to 17.5 ng L−1 during the dry season and from not detected ND to 13.1 ng L−1 during the wet season. The results demonstrate that none of the OPPs concentrations measured exceeded the regulatory limits. Graphical Abstract","PeriodicalId":16295,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies","volume":"46 1","pages":"127 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of solid-phase extraction and in-tube liquid-liquid extraction for the determination of Organophosphorus pesticides in the surface water from Medjerda River, Tunisia\",\"authors\":\"Mouna Necibi, N. Mzoughi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10826076.2023.2222301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In the present work, we develop, validate, and compare two extraction procedures (in-tube liquid-liquid extraction (ITLLE) and solid-phase extraction (SPE)). The parameters that influence extraction efficiency, the nature and volume of the extraction solvent, as well as the pH nature, were improved and a standard solution of Organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) was used. Results indicated that SPE is clearly more successful than ITLLE extraction under optimum conditions. The validated method showed that this approach had good linearity, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.991 to 0.998 and low detection and quantification limits of 0.01–0.03 ng L−1 and 0.03–0.9 ng L−1, respectively. Relative standard deviations were in the range of 0.2 and 1.2%, while extraction recoveries varied from 79 to 97%. The SPE was selected and, optimum recoveries for OPPs were obtained at pH 7, with 10 mL of ethyl acetate. The suggested approach was effectively applied to the analysis of water samples collected from the Medjerda River in two seasons. The average OPPs concentrations ranged from not detected (ND) to 17.5 ng L−1 during the dry season and from not detected ND to 13.1 ng L−1 during the wet season. The results demonstrate that none of the OPPs concentrations measured exceeded the regulatory limits. Graphical Abstract\",\"PeriodicalId\":16295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"127 - 137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826076.2023.2222301\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826076.2023.2222301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在本工作中,我们开发、验证并比较了两种提取方法(管内液-液萃取(ITLLE)和固相萃取(SPE))。改进了影响萃取效率的参数、萃取溶剂的性质和体积以及pH性质,并使用了有机磷农药的标准溶液。结果表明,在最佳条件下,SPE的提取效果明显优于ITLLE。经验证的方法表明,该方法具有良好的线性,相关系数在0.991至0.998之间,检测和定量限在0.01至0.03之间 ng L−1和0.03–0.9 ng L−1。相对标准偏差在0.2%至1.2%之间,而提取回收率在79%至97%之间。选择SPE,并在pH为7时获得OPP的最佳回收率,10 mL乙酸乙酯。所提出的方法有效地应用于两个季节从Medjerda河采集的水样的分析。OPPs的平均浓度范围从未检测到(ND)到17.5 ng L−1在旱季,从未检测到的ND到13.1 ng L−1。结果表明,所测得的OPP浓度均未超过监管限值。图形摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of solid-phase extraction and in-tube liquid-liquid extraction for the determination of Organophosphorus pesticides in the surface water from Medjerda River, Tunisia
Abstract In the present work, we develop, validate, and compare two extraction procedures (in-tube liquid-liquid extraction (ITLLE) and solid-phase extraction (SPE)). The parameters that influence extraction efficiency, the nature and volume of the extraction solvent, as well as the pH nature, were improved and a standard solution of Organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) was used. Results indicated that SPE is clearly more successful than ITLLE extraction under optimum conditions. The validated method showed that this approach had good linearity, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.991 to 0.998 and low detection and quantification limits of 0.01–0.03 ng L−1 and 0.03–0.9 ng L−1, respectively. Relative standard deviations were in the range of 0.2 and 1.2%, while extraction recoveries varied from 79 to 97%. The SPE was selected and, optimum recoveries for OPPs were obtained at pH 7, with 10 mL of ethyl acetate. The suggested approach was effectively applied to the analysis of water samples collected from the Medjerda River in two seasons. The average OPPs concentrations ranged from not detected (ND) to 17.5 ng L−1 during the dry season and from not detected ND to 13.1 ng L−1 during the wet season. The results demonstrate that none of the OPPs concentrations measured exceeded the regulatory limits. Graphical Abstract
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies is an internationally acclaimed forum for fast publication of critical, peer reviewed manuscripts dealing with analytical, preparative and process scale liquid chromatography and all of its related technologies, including TLC, capillary electrophoresis, capillary electrochromatography, supercritical fluid chromatography and extraction, field-flow technologies, affinity, and much more. New separation methodologies are added when they are developed. Papers dealing with research and development results, as well as critical reviews of important technologies, are published in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信