视角选择和价值观一致性在减少隐性种族偏见中的作用

IF 0.3 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Cheryl Tatano Beck, Yors A. Garcia, Robyn M. Catagnus
{"title":"视角选择和价值观一致性在减少隐性种族偏见中的作用","authors":"Cheryl Tatano Beck, Yors A. Garcia, Robyn M. Catagnus","doi":"10.11144/javeriana.upsy21.eptv","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study explored the effect of perspective taking and values consistency tasks on reducing implicit racial bias. Using a repeated measures design with a control group, 39 participants, 20 female and 19 males aged from 18-54 years, who identified as White were administered the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure. All participants in the experimental group (n = 19) and control group (n = 20) completed the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire, Modified Modern Racism Scale, Valuing Questionnaire, and a Likert scale. Experimental group participants completed brief values consistency and perspective taking tasks, whereas the control group completed a guided task. A 2 x 4 mixed repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted to determine if there was interaction effect between group and trial types and a MANOVA to identify differences in the explicit measures between both groups. Results showed that after the values work and perspective taking exercises, participants in the experimental group recorded shorter mean responses for Inconsistent-Black trial blocks versus Consistent-Black trial blocks compared to the control group. Additionally, a statistically significant impact for interaction between condition and trial type was found for the Consistent-White trial type in the experimental group. Recommendations for future research are presented.","PeriodicalId":47141,"journal":{"name":"Universitas Psychologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Perspective Taking and Values Consistency in Reducing Implicit Racial Bias\",\"authors\":\"Cheryl Tatano Beck, Yors A. Garcia, Robyn M. Catagnus\",\"doi\":\"10.11144/javeriana.upsy21.eptv\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study explored the effect of perspective taking and values consistency tasks on reducing implicit racial bias. Using a repeated measures design with a control group, 39 participants, 20 female and 19 males aged from 18-54 years, who identified as White were administered the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure. All participants in the experimental group (n = 19) and control group (n = 20) completed the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire, Modified Modern Racism Scale, Valuing Questionnaire, and a Likert scale. Experimental group participants completed brief values consistency and perspective taking tasks, whereas the control group completed a guided task. A 2 x 4 mixed repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted to determine if there was interaction effect between group and trial types and a MANOVA to identify differences in the explicit measures between both groups. Results showed that after the values work and perspective taking exercises, participants in the experimental group recorded shorter mean responses for Inconsistent-Black trial blocks versus Consistent-Black trial blocks compared to the control group. Additionally, a statistically significant impact for interaction between condition and trial type was found for the Consistent-White trial type in the experimental group. Recommendations for future research are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universitas Psychologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universitas Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.upsy21.eptv\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universitas Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.upsy21.eptv","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前的研究探讨了视角转换和价值观一致性任务对减少隐性种族偏见的影响。通过与对照组的重复测量设计,39名参与者,20名女性和19名男性,年龄在18-54岁之间,被认定为白人,接受了内隐关系评估程序。实验组(n=19)和对照组(n=20)的所有参与者都完成了多伦多移情问卷、改良现代种族主义量表、价值评估问卷和Likert量表。实验组参与者完成了简短的价值观一致性和观点采纳任务,而对照组则完成了指导任务。进行2×4混合重复测量方差分析,以确定组和试验类型之间是否存在交互作用,并进行MANOVA,以确定两组之间明确测量的差异。结果显示,与对照组相比,在价值观工作和观点分析练习后,实验组的参与者对不一致黑人试验区块的平均反应较短。此外,在实验组中,一致白色试验类型对条件和试验类型之间的相互作用有统计学显著影响。提出了未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Perspective Taking and Values Consistency in Reducing Implicit Racial Bias
The current study explored the effect of perspective taking and values consistency tasks on reducing implicit racial bias. Using a repeated measures design with a control group, 39 participants, 20 female and 19 males aged from 18-54 years, who identified as White were administered the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure. All participants in the experimental group (n = 19) and control group (n = 20) completed the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire, Modified Modern Racism Scale, Valuing Questionnaire, and a Likert scale. Experimental group participants completed brief values consistency and perspective taking tasks, whereas the control group completed a guided task. A 2 x 4 mixed repeated-measures analysis of variance was conducted to determine if there was interaction effect between group and trial types and a MANOVA to identify differences in the explicit measures between both groups. Results showed that after the values work and perspective taking exercises, participants in the experimental group recorded shorter mean responses for Inconsistent-Black trial blocks versus Consistent-Black trial blocks compared to the control group. Additionally, a statistically significant impact for interaction between condition and trial type was found for the Consistent-White trial type in the experimental group. Recommendations for future research are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Universitas Psychologica
Universitas Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Universitas Psychologica es una revista científica trimestral con un amplio espectro temático y teórico. Es una publicación de carácter general y plural en la medida en que incluye trabajos originales, en inglés o español, de los diversos enfoques de la psicología y de sus distintos campos de aplicación. Cada año un número especial es dedicado a un tópico específico de distintas áreas de la psicología (número monográfico). El propósito de Universitas es convertirse en un fuente importante de consulta a nivel mundial y en un referente permanente de visibilidad e intercambio.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信