介于隐藏和传统之间。肯尼斯·伯克与符号理论

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Martin Švantner, Marianna Abrahamyan
{"title":"介于隐藏和传统之间。肯尼斯·伯克与符号理论","authors":"Martin Švantner, Marianna Abrahamyan","doi":"10.14712/23366680.2022.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SYNOPSIS Between the Hidden and the Conventional: Kenneth Burke and the Theory of the Symbol This article discusses Kenneth Burke’s theory of the symbol, which considers the use of the sign as a specifically human activity associated with the formation of meaning. In Burke’s view, the symbol is a meaning-making device that can influence human action and thoughts, and therefore represents the key to understanding the nature of human communication. In this article, Burke’s ideas are compared to other sign-symbol theories — namely, the semiotics of Umberto Eco and Juri Lotman, Charles Sanders Peirce’s semeiotics, as well as Ernst Cassirer’s philosophy of symbolic forms —, with analysis on the way each of these theorists defines the nature of the symbol and its conventional acceptation, principle of identification, and the characteristics of the sym-bolisation process itself.","PeriodicalId":36767,"journal":{"name":"Slovo a Smysl","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mezi skrytým a konvenčním. Kenneth Burke a teorie symbolu\",\"authors\":\"Martin Švantner, Marianna Abrahamyan\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/23366680.2022.2.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SYNOPSIS Between the Hidden and the Conventional: Kenneth Burke and the Theory of the Symbol This article discusses Kenneth Burke’s theory of the symbol, which considers the use of the sign as a specifically human activity associated with the formation of meaning. In Burke’s view, the symbol is a meaning-making device that can influence human action and thoughts, and therefore represents the key to understanding the nature of human communication. In this article, Burke’s ideas are compared to other sign-symbol theories — namely, the semiotics of Umberto Eco and Juri Lotman, Charles Sanders Peirce’s semeiotics, as well as Ernst Cassirer’s philosophy of symbolic forms —, with analysis on the way each of these theorists defines the nature of the symbol and its conventional acceptation, principle of identification, and the characteristics of the sym-bolisation process itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Slovo a Smysl\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Slovo a Smysl\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366680.2022.2.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slovo a Smysl","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366680.2022.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

隐藏与常规之间的概述:肯尼斯·伯克与符号理论本文讨论了肯尼斯·伯克的符号理论,该理论认为符号的使用是一种与意义形成相关的特定人类活动。在伯克看来,符号是一种意义制造手段,可以影响人类的行为和思想,因此代表着理解人类交流本质的关键。在这篇文章中,伯克的思想与其他符号符号理论——即翁贝托·埃科和尤里·洛特曼的符号学、查尔斯·桑德斯·皮尔斯的符号学以及恩斯特·卡西尔的符号形式哲学——进行了比较,并分析了每一位理论家定义符号本质及其常规接受、识别原则,以及符号化过程本身的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mezi skrytým a konvenčním. Kenneth Burke a teorie symbolu
SYNOPSIS Between the Hidden and the Conventional: Kenneth Burke and the Theory of the Symbol This article discusses Kenneth Burke’s theory of the symbol, which considers the use of the sign as a specifically human activity associated with the formation of meaning. In Burke’s view, the symbol is a meaning-making device that can influence human action and thoughts, and therefore represents the key to understanding the nature of human communication. In this article, Burke’s ideas are compared to other sign-symbol theories — namely, the semiotics of Umberto Eco and Juri Lotman, Charles Sanders Peirce’s semeiotics, as well as Ernst Cassirer’s philosophy of symbolic forms —, with analysis on the way each of these theorists defines the nature of the symbol and its conventional acceptation, principle of identification, and the characteristics of the sym-bolisation process itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Slovo a Smysl
Slovo a Smysl Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信