{"title":"合作策展:民主包容","authors":"J. Crawshay-Hall","doi":"10.1080/00043389.2020.1815951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, I discuss the perceived failure of the second Johannesburg biennale, Trade Routes: History amd Geography, curated by Okwui Enwezor in 1997. Although curating can be used as a socio-critical tool, Enwezor's authorial curatorial model as witnessed in Trade Routes is criticised for being non-responsive towards issues the South African public was actively dealing with in 1997, which contributed to its perceived failure. As a seminal mega-exhibition in South Africa, I consider the influence Trade Routes may have had on subsequent South African curatorial practice and discuss whether Trade Routes may have acted as a catalyst for local curators to consider alternative curatorial methodologies. I argue that South Africa has witnessed a shift towards group, participatory, and community-driven curatorial approaches. I review Portia Malatjie's group curatorial strategy as evidenced in , exhibited in 2012, and the advantages obtained thereby. I discuss how group curatorial strategies subvert the inherited manner of conceptualising, theorising, and organising an exhibition and how this provides opportunities to democratise access and pluralise inclusion. I propose that post-apartheid curatorial practices require caution with regard to valuing one group or individual over another and that collaborative curatorial approaches may foster a method of continuous self-reflection and regulation.","PeriodicalId":40908,"journal":{"name":"De Arte","volume":"56 1","pages":"4 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00043389.2020.1815951","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative Curating: Democratising Inclusion\",\"authors\":\"J. Crawshay-Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00043389.2020.1815951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this article, I discuss the perceived failure of the second Johannesburg biennale, Trade Routes: History amd Geography, curated by Okwui Enwezor in 1997. Although curating can be used as a socio-critical tool, Enwezor's authorial curatorial model as witnessed in Trade Routes is criticised for being non-responsive towards issues the South African public was actively dealing with in 1997, which contributed to its perceived failure. As a seminal mega-exhibition in South Africa, I consider the influence Trade Routes may have had on subsequent South African curatorial practice and discuss whether Trade Routes may have acted as a catalyst for local curators to consider alternative curatorial methodologies. I argue that South Africa has witnessed a shift towards group, participatory, and community-driven curatorial approaches. I review Portia Malatjie's group curatorial strategy as evidenced in , exhibited in 2012, and the advantages obtained thereby. I discuss how group curatorial strategies subvert the inherited manner of conceptualising, theorising, and organising an exhibition and how this provides opportunities to democratise access and pluralise inclusion. I propose that post-apartheid curatorial practices require caution with regard to valuing one group or individual over another and that collaborative curatorial approaches may foster a method of continuous self-reflection and regulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"De Arte\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"4 - 28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00043389.2020.1815951\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"De Arte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.2020.1815951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Arte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.2020.1815951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract In this article, I discuss the perceived failure of the second Johannesburg biennale, Trade Routes: History amd Geography, curated by Okwui Enwezor in 1997. Although curating can be used as a socio-critical tool, Enwezor's authorial curatorial model as witnessed in Trade Routes is criticised for being non-responsive towards issues the South African public was actively dealing with in 1997, which contributed to its perceived failure. As a seminal mega-exhibition in South Africa, I consider the influence Trade Routes may have had on subsequent South African curatorial practice and discuss whether Trade Routes may have acted as a catalyst for local curators to consider alternative curatorial methodologies. I argue that South Africa has witnessed a shift towards group, participatory, and community-driven curatorial approaches. I review Portia Malatjie's group curatorial strategy as evidenced in , exhibited in 2012, and the advantages obtained thereby. I discuss how group curatorial strategies subvert the inherited manner of conceptualising, theorising, and organising an exhibition and how this provides opportunities to democratise access and pluralise inclusion. I propose that post-apartheid curatorial practices require caution with regard to valuing one group or individual over another and that collaborative curatorial approaches may foster a method of continuous self-reflection and regulation.