基于深度学习的地震断层自动解释的现状和未来方向:系统综述

IF 10.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yu An , Haiwen Du , Siteng Ma , Yingjie Niu , Dairui Liu , Jing Wang , Yuhan Du , Conrad Childs , John Walsh , Ruihai Dong
{"title":"基于深度学习的地震断层自动解释的现状和未来方向:系统综述","authors":"Yu An ,&nbsp;Haiwen Du ,&nbsp;Siteng Ma ,&nbsp;Yingjie Niu ,&nbsp;Dairui Liu ,&nbsp;Jing Wang ,&nbsp;Yuhan Du ,&nbsp;Conrad Childs ,&nbsp;John Walsh ,&nbsp;Ruihai Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Automated seismic fault interpretation has been an active area of research. Since 2018, Deep learning (DL) based seismic fault interpretation methods have emerged and shown promising results. However, to date, these methods have not been reasonably summarised, making it difficult for those involved to make sense of the current development process. To close this gap, we systematically reviewed the DL-based fault interpretation literature published between 2012 and 2022, and searched seven digital libraries. Fault interpretation has been considered an image-processing task using only convolutional neural networks (CNN)-based DL methods, and most of them have been trained in a supervised manner. U-Net and its variants designed for the image segmentation task are the most commonly used network structures. A total of 73 seismic datasets were summarised from the 56 articles included, of which only three field datasets and four synthetic datasets were publicly available benchmarks. The study reported benefits of using DL, such as its outstanding learning and generalisation capabilities or predicting faults in a fast, cheap and repeatable manner, which ultimately led to an increase in the acceptability of these methods and the potential to incorporate them into oil and industry workflows. However, we identified 12 challenges that hinder its integration into industrial workflows, including the most discussed lack of sufficient annotated data. We conclude with an in-depth discussion of current research trends and potential future research directions to promote research on less studied areas and collaboration between computer scientists and geoscientists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":"243 ","pages":"Article 104509"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current state and future directions for deep learning based automatic seismic fault interpretation: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Yu An ,&nbsp;Haiwen Du ,&nbsp;Siteng Ma ,&nbsp;Yingjie Niu ,&nbsp;Dairui Liu ,&nbsp;Jing Wang ,&nbsp;Yuhan Du ,&nbsp;Conrad Childs ,&nbsp;John Walsh ,&nbsp;Ruihai Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Automated seismic fault interpretation has been an active area of research. Since 2018, Deep learning (DL) based seismic fault interpretation methods have emerged and shown promising results. However, to date, these methods have not been reasonably summarised, making it difficult for those involved to make sense of the current development process. To close this gap, we systematically reviewed the DL-based fault interpretation literature published between 2012 and 2022, and searched seven digital libraries. Fault interpretation has been considered an image-processing task using only convolutional neural networks (CNN)-based DL methods, and most of them have been trained in a supervised manner. U-Net and its variants designed for the image segmentation task are the most commonly used network structures. A total of 73 seismic datasets were summarised from the 56 articles included, of which only three field datasets and four synthetic datasets were publicly available benchmarks. The study reported benefits of using DL, such as its outstanding learning and generalisation capabilities or predicting faults in a fast, cheap and repeatable manner, which ultimately led to an increase in the acceptability of these methods and the potential to incorporate them into oil and industry workflows. However, we identified 12 challenges that hinder its integration into industrial workflows, including the most discussed lack of sufficient annotated data. We conclude with an in-depth discussion of current research trends and potential future research directions to promote research on less studied areas and collaboration between computer scientists and geoscientists.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth-Science Reviews\",\"volume\":\"243 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth-Science Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825223001988\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825223001988","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

地震断层自动解释一直是一个活跃的研究领域。自2018年以来,基于深度学习(DL)的地震断层解释方法已经出现,并显示出良好的效果。然而,到目前为止,这些方法还没有得到合理的总结,这使得相关人员很难理解当前的开发过程。为了缩小这一差距,我们系统地回顾了2012年至2022年间发表的基于dl的断层解释文献,并检索了7个数字图书馆。故障解释一直被认为是一项图像处理任务,仅使用基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的深度学习方法,并且大多数方法都是以监督方式训练的。为图像分割任务设计的U-Net及其变体是最常用的网络结构。从56篇文章中总结了73个地震数据集,其中只有3个现场数据集和4个合成数据集是公开可用的基准。该研究报告了使用深度学习的好处,例如其出色的学习和泛化能力,或以快速、廉价和可重复的方式预测故障,最终导致这些方法的可接受性提高,并有可能将其纳入石油和工业工作流程。然而,我们确定了阻碍其融入工业工作流程的12个挑战,包括讨论最多的缺乏足够的注释数据。最后,我们对当前的研究趋势和潜在的未来研究方向进行了深入的讨论,以促进研究较少领域的研究和计算机科学家与地球科学家之间的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current state and future directions for deep learning based automatic seismic fault interpretation: A systematic review

Automated seismic fault interpretation has been an active area of research. Since 2018, Deep learning (DL) based seismic fault interpretation methods have emerged and shown promising results. However, to date, these methods have not been reasonably summarised, making it difficult for those involved to make sense of the current development process. To close this gap, we systematically reviewed the DL-based fault interpretation literature published between 2012 and 2022, and searched seven digital libraries. Fault interpretation has been considered an image-processing task using only convolutional neural networks (CNN)-based DL methods, and most of them have been trained in a supervised manner. U-Net and its variants designed for the image segmentation task are the most commonly used network structures. A total of 73 seismic datasets were summarised from the 56 articles included, of which only three field datasets and four synthetic datasets were publicly available benchmarks. The study reported benefits of using DL, such as its outstanding learning and generalisation capabilities or predicting faults in a fast, cheap and repeatable manner, which ultimately led to an increase in the acceptability of these methods and the potential to incorporate them into oil and industry workflows. However, we identified 12 challenges that hinder its integration into industrial workflows, including the most discussed lack of sufficient annotated data. We conclude with an in-depth discussion of current research trends and potential future research directions to promote research on less studied areas and collaboration between computer scientists and geoscientists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信