有效性研究评论

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Educational Assessment Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10627197.2019.1702465

M. Kane

引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要正如引言中所指出的，我们之所以进行这项工作，有两个原因，第一，鼓励评估人员进行相对全面的有效性评估，第二，提供一些合理全面有效性研究的例子。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Validity Studies Commentary

ABSTRACT As noted in the introduction, we undertook this effort for two reasons, first to encourage assessment developers to undertake relatively comprehensive validity evaluations, and second, to provide some examples of reasonably comprehensive validity studies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Educational Assessment EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

6.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.