共存的暴力和自残:早期男性监狱人群的双重伤害

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Karen Slade, Andrew Forrester, Thom Baguley
{"title":"共存的暴力和自残:早期男性监狱人群的双重伤害","authors":"Karen Slade,&nbsp;Andrew Forrester,&nbsp;Thom Baguley","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study examined the characteristics of men in prison who have a history of both self-harm and violence (known as <i>dual harm</i>) and the extent to which demographic and criminogenic factors, in-prison incidents, and self-harm method could differentiate men who dual harm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Official prison sample data were examined for the period April 2010 to November 2017 (<i>n</i> = 965). Regression analysis of all custodial incidents, demographic and offending information, and imprisonment experience, was undertaken.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Self-harm was associated with violence in prison, representing a 3.5-fold risk of violence compared with men who did not self-harm, after controlling for time in prison, age, and index offence. 60% of men who harmed themselves also engaged in custodial violence, while 32% who were violent also had a self-harm event. After controlling for age at first incident, 11% of the sample had custodial history of dual harm and they accounted for 56% of all recorded custodial incidents. They had a high probability of property damage and fire setting in prison and spent 40% longer in custody. Men who dual harmed used a greater variety of self-harm methods, with increased use of lethal methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Dual harm is prevalent, particularly among those who harm themselves in prison. Men who dual harm contribute excessively to the overall incident burden in prison and demonstrate behavioural variability and risk regarding both violence and self-harm. The findings challenge the usual distinctive management responses or that self-harm or violence is solely the responsibility of health or justice, with greater integration required.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"25 2","pages":"182-198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lcrp.12169","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coexisting violence and self-harm: Dual harm in an early-stage male prison population\",\"authors\":\"Karen Slade,&nbsp;Andrew Forrester,&nbsp;Thom Baguley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lcrp.12169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study examined the characteristics of men in prison who have a history of both self-harm and violence (known as <i>dual harm</i>) and the extent to which demographic and criminogenic factors, in-prison incidents, and self-harm method could differentiate men who dual harm.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Official prison sample data were examined for the period April 2010 to November 2017 (<i>n</i> = 965). Regression analysis of all custodial incidents, demographic and offending information, and imprisonment experience, was undertaken.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Self-harm was associated with violence in prison, representing a 3.5-fold risk of violence compared with men who did not self-harm, after controlling for time in prison, age, and index offence. 60% of men who harmed themselves also engaged in custodial violence, while 32% who were violent also had a self-harm event. After controlling for age at first incident, 11% of the sample had custodial history of dual harm and they accounted for 56% of all recorded custodial incidents. They had a high probability of property damage and fire setting in prison and spent 40% longer in custody. Men who dual harmed used a greater variety of self-harm methods, with increased use of lethal methods.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dual harm is prevalent, particularly among those who harm themselves in prison. Men who dual harm contribute excessively to the overall incident burden in prison and demonstrate behavioural variability and risk regarding both violence and self-harm. The findings challenge the usual distinctive management responses or that self-harm or violence is solely the responsibility of health or justice, with greater integration required.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal and Criminological Psychology\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"182-198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lcrp.12169\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal and Criminological Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12169\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12169","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

目的:本研究调查了监狱中有自残和暴力史(称为双重伤害)的男性的特征,以及人口和犯罪因素、监狱事件和自残方法在多大程度上可以区分双重伤害的男性。方法:检查2010年4月至2017年11月期间的官方监狱样本数据(n=965)。对所有监禁事件、人口统计和犯罪信息以及监禁经历进行了回归分析。结果:在控制了入狱时间、年龄和指数犯罪后,自残与监狱中的暴力行为有关,与没有自残的男性相比,发生暴力的风险是前者的3.5倍。60%的自残男性也参与了监禁暴力,而32%的暴力男性也有自残事件。在控制了第一次事件的年龄后,11%的样本有双重伤害的监禁史,他们占所有记录在案的监禁事件的56%。他们在监狱中发生财产损失和纵火的可能性很高,被拘留的时间延长了40%)。双重伤害的男性使用了更多种类的自残方法,致命方法的使用也越来越多。结论:双重伤害很普遍,尤其是在那些在监狱里伤害自己的人中。双重伤害的男性过度加重了监狱中的总体事件负担,并表现出暴力和自残行为的可变性和风险。调查结果挑战了通常独特的管理对策,或者自我伤害或暴力完全是健康或正义的责任;需要更大的集成度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Coexisting violence and self-harm: Dual harm in an early-stage male prison population

Coexisting violence and self-harm: Dual harm in an early-stage male prison population

Purpose

This study examined the characteristics of men in prison who have a history of both self-harm and violence (known as dual harm) and the extent to which demographic and criminogenic factors, in-prison incidents, and self-harm method could differentiate men who dual harm.

Methods

Official prison sample data were examined for the period April 2010 to November 2017 (n = 965). Regression analysis of all custodial incidents, demographic and offending information, and imprisonment experience, was undertaken.

Results

Self-harm was associated with violence in prison, representing a 3.5-fold risk of violence compared with men who did not self-harm, after controlling for time in prison, age, and index offence. 60% of men who harmed themselves also engaged in custodial violence, while 32% who were violent also had a self-harm event. After controlling for age at first incident, 11% of the sample had custodial history of dual harm and they accounted for 56% of all recorded custodial incidents. They had a high probability of property damage and fire setting in prison and spent 40% longer in custody. Men who dual harmed used a greater variety of self-harm methods, with increased use of lethal methods.

Conclusion

Dual harm is prevalent, particularly among those who harm themselves in prison. Men who dual harm contribute excessively to the overall incident burden in prison and demonstrate behavioural variability and risk regarding both violence and self-harm. The findings challenge the usual distinctive management responses or that self-harm or violence is solely the responsibility of health or justice, with greater integration required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Legal and Criminological Psychology publishes original papers in all areas of psychology and law: - victimology - policing and crime detection - crime prevention - management of offenders - mental health and the law - public attitudes to law - role of the expert witness - impact of law on behaviour - interviewing and eyewitness testimony - jury decision making - deception The journal publishes papers which advance professional and scientific knowledge defined broadly as the application of psychology to law and interdisciplinary enquiry in legal and psychological fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信