在法律研究中发表运作良好的京东机构学习成果：为什么以及如何？

Q4 Social Sciences

Legal Reference Services Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/0270319X.2023.2216129

Dajiang Nie

{"title":"在法律研究中发表运作良好的京东机构学习成果：为什么以及如何？","authors":"Dajiang Nie","doi":"10.1080/0270319X.2023.2216129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines the legal-research institutional learning outcomes of 196 law schools accredited by the American Bar Association and proposes improvement to best practices. The suboptimal format and content of legal-research institutional learning outcomes contribute to this deficiency, exacerbated by challenges from the upcoming new bar examination. To improve legal-research institutional learning outcomes, law schools should distinguish legal-research institutional learning outcomes from other institutional learning outcomes, include specific and effective performance criteria, and update learning outcomes periodically. To streamline this process, law schools should draw wisdom from both external benchmarks and the expertise of internal legal-research instructors.","PeriodicalId":39856,"journal":{"name":"Legal Reference Services Quarterly","volume":"42 1","pages":"89 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Publishing Functioning JD Institutional Learning Outcomes on Legal Research: Why and How?\",\"authors\":\"Dajiang Nie\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0270319X.2023.2216129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article examines the legal-research institutional learning outcomes of 196 law schools accredited by the American Bar Association and proposes improvement to best practices. The suboptimal format and content of legal-research institutional learning outcomes contribute to this deficiency, exacerbated by challenges from the upcoming new bar examination. To improve legal-research institutional learning outcomes, law schools should distinguish legal-research institutional learning outcomes from other institutional learning outcomes, include specific and effective performance criteria, and update learning outcomes periodically. To streamline this process, law schools should draw wisdom from both external benchmarks and the expertise of internal legal-research instructors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Reference Services Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"89 - 119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Reference Services Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319X.2023.2216129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Reference Services Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319X.2023.2216129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文考察了美国律师协会认可的196所法学院的法律研究机构学习成果，并提出了改进最佳实践的建议。法律研究机构学习成果的形式和内容不理想，导致了这一不足，而即将到来的新律师考试带来的挑战又加剧了这一缺陷。为了提高法律研究机构的学习成果，法学院应将法律研究机构学习成果与其他机构学习成果区分开来，包括具体有效的绩效标准，并定期更新学习成果。为了简化这一过程，法学院应该从外部基准和内部法律研究讲师的专业知识中汲取智慧。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Publishing Functioning JD Institutional Learning Outcomes on Legal Research: Why and How?

Abstract This article examines the legal-research institutional learning outcomes of 196 law schools accredited by the American Bar Association and proposes improvement to best practices. The suboptimal format and content of legal-research institutional learning outcomes contribute to this deficiency, exacerbated by challenges from the upcoming new bar examination. To improve legal-research institutional learning outcomes, law schools should distinguish legal-research institutional learning outcomes from other institutional learning outcomes, include specific and effective performance criteria, and update learning outcomes periodically. To streamline this process, law schools should draw wisdom from both external benchmarks and the expertise of internal legal-research instructors.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Legal Reference Services Quarterly Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： An important forum for daily problems and issues, Legal Reference Services Quarterly will assist you in your day-to-day work as it has been helping other law librarians and members of the legal profession for over a decade. You will find articles that are serious, humorous, critical, or simply helpful to the working librarian. Annotated subject bibliographies, overviews of legal literature, reviews of commonly used tools, and the inclusion of reference problems unique to corporate law libraries, judicial libraries, and academic collections will keep you up-to-date on the continuously expanding volume of legal materials and their use in legal research.