在政治僵化(走向冲突)和水流动(走向和平)之间:墨西哥与危地马拉和伯利兹的水边界

IF 0.2
E. K. Michel
{"title":"在政治僵化(走向冲突)和水流动(走向和平)之间:墨西哥与危地马拉和伯利兹的水边界","authors":"E. K. Michel","doi":"10.30827/REVPAZ.V10I1.5349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mexico shares two borders with Guatemala and Belize where surface waters are abundant, a situation that enables dynamic relations between waters and boundaries. The border rigidity has traditionally contrasted with profound local transboundary interactions between water linked to socio-cultural dynamics and the multiple circumstances of liquidity. Resulting from more than a decade of research in the area, this paper proposes to analyze different water borders conceived as an integrative duality –rigidity versus fluidity- from a perspective which looks beyond dominant methodological nationalism. Instead of opposing water fluidity and the rigidity of political boundaries, through examples of “transboundary water crossings” and transboundary river basins, the article proposes “water transbordering” as a perspective that dynamically intertwines waters and borders. Finally, it highlights the importance for research to go beyond nationalist, homogeneous and hegemonic visions about rigid borders, which ultimately feeds conflicts and moves towards a perspective that includes local dynamics of waters and boundaries in support a transboundary analysis that moves towards transboundary environmental peace.","PeriodicalId":42009,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Paz y Conflictos","volume":"10 1","pages":"61-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entre rigidez política (hacia el conflicto) y fluidez hídrica (hacia la paz): Las fronteras de agua de México con Guatemala y Belice\",\"authors\":\"E. K. Michel\",\"doi\":\"10.30827/REVPAZ.V10I1.5349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mexico shares two borders with Guatemala and Belize where surface waters are abundant, a situation that enables dynamic relations between waters and boundaries. The border rigidity has traditionally contrasted with profound local transboundary interactions between water linked to socio-cultural dynamics and the multiple circumstances of liquidity. Resulting from more than a decade of research in the area, this paper proposes to analyze different water borders conceived as an integrative duality –rigidity versus fluidity- from a perspective which looks beyond dominant methodological nationalism. Instead of opposing water fluidity and the rigidity of political boundaries, through examples of “transboundary water crossings” and transboundary river basins, the article proposes “water transbordering” as a perspective that dynamically intertwines waters and borders. Finally, it highlights the importance for research to go beyond nationalist, homogeneous and hegemonic visions about rigid borders, which ultimately feeds conflicts and moves towards a perspective that includes local dynamics of waters and boundaries in support a transboundary analysis that moves towards transboundary environmental peace.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Paz y Conflictos\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"61-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Paz y Conflictos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30827/REVPAZ.V10I1.5349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Paz y Conflictos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30827/REVPAZ.V10I1.5349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

墨西哥与危地马拉和伯利兹有两个边界,危地马拉和伯利兹的地表水丰富,这种情况使水域和边界之间能够建立动态关系。传统上,边界僵化与水与社会文化动态和流动性的多重环境之间深刻的地方跨界互动形成了鲜明对比。根据十多年来在该领域的研究,本文建议从超越主流方法论民族主义的角度来分析不同的边界,这些边界被认为是一种综合的二元性——刚性与流动性。文章没有反对水的流动性和政治边界的刚性,而是通过“跨界水过境”和跨界河流流域的例子,提出“水的跨界”是一个动态地将水和边界交织在一起的视角。最后,它强调了研究超越民族主义、同质化和霸权的刚性边界愿景的重要性,刚性边界最终助长了冲突,并朝着包括当地水域和边界动态的角度发展,以支持跨界分析,从而实现跨界环境和平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Entre rigidez política (hacia el conflicto) y fluidez hídrica (hacia la paz): Las fronteras de agua de México con Guatemala y Belice
Mexico shares two borders with Guatemala and Belize where surface waters are abundant, a situation that enables dynamic relations between waters and boundaries. The border rigidity has traditionally contrasted with profound local transboundary interactions between water linked to socio-cultural dynamics and the multiple circumstances of liquidity. Resulting from more than a decade of research in the area, this paper proposes to analyze different water borders conceived as an integrative duality –rigidity versus fluidity- from a perspective which looks beyond dominant methodological nationalism. Instead of opposing water fluidity and the rigidity of political boundaries, through examples of “transboundary water crossings” and transboundary river basins, the article proposes “water transbordering” as a perspective that dynamically intertwines waters and borders. Finally, it highlights the importance for research to go beyond nationalist, homogeneous and hegemonic visions about rigid borders, which ultimately feeds conflicts and moves towards a perspective that includes local dynamics of waters and boundaries in support a transboundary analysis that moves towards transboundary environmental peace.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Paz y Conflictos
Revista de Paz y Conflictos POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信