2020年东京奥运会:从一双“安全的手”到一双腐败的爪子

Jules Boykoff
{"title":"2020年东京奥运会:从一双“安全的手”到一双腐败的爪子","authors":"Jules Boykoff","doi":"10.1080/18692729.2023.2168836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2020 Tokyo Olympics demonstrated to the world that the Games are not too big to fail; instead, they may be too big to succeed, especially during a public-health pandemic. Tokyo bidders promised they’d be a “safe pair of hands” for the Games. However, the Olympics brought astronomical costs, greenwashing, displacement, security militarization, and corruption – problems that have become endemic to the Games in general. Tokyo 2020 was originally slated to cost $7.3 billion, but the price tag escalated to approximately four times that, according to a government audit in Japan. Postponement added billions more, bringing the total to around $30 billion. The Games created space for local developers to leverage the Olympic state of exception to relax longtime height restrictions on building in the neighborhood around the National Stadium, thereby prying open urban terrain for well-positioned developers. Games organizers also generated credible allegations of greenwashing: publicly displaying concern for the environment while in actuality doing the bare minimum, if anything, to make material ecological improvements. Tokyo 2020 boosters coined a “Recovery Olympics” mantra, vowing the Games would supercharge Fukushima’s rejuvenation after it was struck by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear meltdown. The Tokyo Olympics incentivized a rushed process to return residents to Fukushima, regardless of public-health perils for the local population. Kowata Masumi, an elected official in Fukushima Prefecture’s Okuma Town, said Olympic construction actually slowed down Fukushima’s recovery. She stated in 2019, “The nuclear radiation is still very high. Only one small section is being cleaned. The wider region is still an evacuation zone. There is still radiation in the area. Meanwhile, we’re [hosting] the Olympics.” Before the Games started, social critic Koide Hiroaki framed the situation in clear moral terms: “The Tokyo Olympics will take place in a state of nuclear emergency. Those countries and people who participate will, on the one hand, themselves risk exposure, and, on the other, become accomplices to the crimes of this nation.” While Fukushima residents were encouraged to return to potentially unsafe spaces, the Olympics also displaced Tokyo inhabitants from their communities. The aforementioned change in zoning laws cleared a political path for the elimination of public housing units. More specifically, residents from the Kasumigaoka apartment complex, which sat in the","PeriodicalId":37204,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Japan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Tokyo 2020 Olympics: From a “safe pair of hands” to a corrupt pair of claws\",\"authors\":\"Jules Boykoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18692729.2023.2168836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2020 Tokyo Olympics demonstrated to the world that the Games are not too big to fail; instead, they may be too big to succeed, especially during a public-health pandemic. Tokyo bidders promised they’d be a “safe pair of hands” for the Games. However, the Olympics brought astronomical costs, greenwashing, displacement, security militarization, and corruption – problems that have become endemic to the Games in general. Tokyo 2020 was originally slated to cost $7.3 billion, but the price tag escalated to approximately four times that, according to a government audit in Japan. Postponement added billions more, bringing the total to around $30 billion. The Games created space for local developers to leverage the Olympic state of exception to relax longtime height restrictions on building in the neighborhood around the National Stadium, thereby prying open urban terrain for well-positioned developers. Games organizers also generated credible allegations of greenwashing: publicly displaying concern for the environment while in actuality doing the bare minimum, if anything, to make material ecological improvements. Tokyo 2020 boosters coined a “Recovery Olympics” mantra, vowing the Games would supercharge Fukushima’s rejuvenation after it was struck by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear meltdown. The Tokyo Olympics incentivized a rushed process to return residents to Fukushima, regardless of public-health perils for the local population. Kowata Masumi, an elected official in Fukushima Prefecture’s Okuma Town, said Olympic construction actually slowed down Fukushima’s recovery. She stated in 2019, “The nuclear radiation is still very high. Only one small section is being cleaned. The wider region is still an evacuation zone. There is still radiation in the area. Meanwhile, we’re [hosting] the Olympics.” Before the Games started, social critic Koide Hiroaki framed the situation in clear moral terms: “The Tokyo Olympics will take place in a state of nuclear emergency. Those countries and people who participate will, on the one hand, themselves risk exposure, and, on the other, become accomplices to the crimes of this nation.” While Fukushima residents were encouraged to return to potentially unsafe spaces, the Olympics also displaced Tokyo inhabitants from their communities. The aforementioned change in zoning laws cleared a political path for the elimination of public housing units. More specifically, residents from the Kasumigaoka apartment complex, which sat in the\",\"PeriodicalId\":37204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Japan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Japan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18692729.2023.2168836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18692729.2023.2168836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年东京奥运会向世界证明,奥运会不会大到不能倒;相反,它们可能太大而无法成功,尤其是在公共卫生疫情期间。东京申办者承诺,他们将成为奥运会的“安全之手”。然而,奥运会带来了天文数字的成本、绿色清洗、流离失所、安全军事化和腐败——这些问题已成为奥运会普遍存在的问题。根据日本政府的审计,2020年东京奥运会原定耗资73亿美元,但价格上涨至约四倍。延期又增加了数十亿美元,使总额达到约300亿美元。奥运会为当地开发商创造了空间,他们可以利用奥运会的例外状态,放松对国家体育场周围社区建筑的长期高度限制,从而为处于有利地位的开发商窥探开放的城市地形。奥运会组织者还提出了可信的“洗绿”指控:公开表示对环境的关注,而实际上,如果有什么不同的话,那就是尽可能少地改善物质生态。2020年东京奥运会的支持者们创造了一个“恢复奥运会”的口号,发誓奥运会将推动福岛在2011年东日本大地震、海啸和核熔毁后的复兴。东京奥运会鼓励人们不顾当地民众的公共健康风险,匆忙将居民送回福岛。福岛县大沼镇的民选官员Kowata Masumi表示,奥运会的建设实际上减缓了福岛的复苏。她在2019年表示,“核辐射仍然很高。只有一小部分正在清理。更大的区域仍然是疏散区。该地区仍然有辐射。与此同时,我们正在举办奥运会。”在奥运会开始之前,社会评论家广木光德(Koide Hiroaki)用明确的道德术语描述了这种情况:“东京奥运会将在核紧急状态下举行。一方面,那些参加奥运会的国家和人民将面临暴露风险,另一方面,他们将成为这个国家罪行的帮凶。”,奥运会也使东京居民背井离乡。上述分区法的修改为取消公共住房单元扫清了政治道路。更具体地说,Kasumigaoka公寓楼的居民
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Tokyo 2020 Olympics: From a “safe pair of hands” to a corrupt pair of claws
The 2020 Tokyo Olympics demonstrated to the world that the Games are not too big to fail; instead, they may be too big to succeed, especially during a public-health pandemic. Tokyo bidders promised they’d be a “safe pair of hands” for the Games. However, the Olympics brought astronomical costs, greenwashing, displacement, security militarization, and corruption – problems that have become endemic to the Games in general. Tokyo 2020 was originally slated to cost $7.3 billion, but the price tag escalated to approximately four times that, according to a government audit in Japan. Postponement added billions more, bringing the total to around $30 billion. The Games created space for local developers to leverage the Olympic state of exception to relax longtime height restrictions on building in the neighborhood around the National Stadium, thereby prying open urban terrain for well-positioned developers. Games organizers also generated credible allegations of greenwashing: publicly displaying concern for the environment while in actuality doing the bare minimum, if anything, to make material ecological improvements. Tokyo 2020 boosters coined a “Recovery Olympics” mantra, vowing the Games would supercharge Fukushima’s rejuvenation after it was struck by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear meltdown. The Tokyo Olympics incentivized a rushed process to return residents to Fukushima, regardless of public-health perils for the local population. Kowata Masumi, an elected official in Fukushima Prefecture’s Okuma Town, said Olympic construction actually slowed down Fukushima’s recovery. She stated in 2019, “The nuclear radiation is still very high. Only one small section is being cleaned. The wider region is still an evacuation zone. There is still radiation in the area. Meanwhile, we’re [hosting] the Olympics.” Before the Games started, social critic Koide Hiroaki framed the situation in clear moral terms: “The Tokyo Olympics will take place in a state of nuclear emergency. Those countries and people who participate will, on the one hand, themselves risk exposure, and, on the other, become accomplices to the crimes of this nation.” While Fukushima residents were encouraged to return to potentially unsafe spaces, the Olympics also displaced Tokyo inhabitants from their communities. The aforementioned change in zoning laws cleared a political path for the elimination of public housing units. More specifically, residents from the Kasumigaoka apartment complex, which sat in the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Japan
Contemporary Japan Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信