评估MLIS学生学习体验的有用工具

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
J. Koos
{"title":"评估MLIS学生学习体验的有用工具","authors":"J. Koos","doi":"10.18438/eblip30109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Review of:\nAdkins, D., Buchanan, S. A., Bossaller, J. S., Brendler, B. M., Alston, J. K., & Moulaison Sandy, H. (2021). Assessing experiential learning to promote students’ diversity engagement. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 62(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis.2019-0061\nAbstract\nObjective – To develop a rubric to assess diversity awareness and professional socialization through in-person or online experiential learning for online MLIS students.\nDesign – Exploratory case study.\nSetting – School of Information Science & Learning Technologies, University of Missouri.\nSubjects – Six experiential learning projects designed to promote diversity and professional socialization for online MLIS students.\nMethods – The authors developed a rubric in order to evaluate the characteristics of several experiential learning projects. The major themes that were measured in the rubric were identified through a comprehensive literature search, and these included Professional Socialization, Service Orientation, Values Orientation, and Diversity & Inclusion. The authors also added three original accessibility factors that they considered relevant from a practical approach: time, money, and geographic mobility.\nMain Results – The rubric was successfully applied to several ongoing experiential learning projects, as well as to a new project. The authors concluded that it provided a useful framework for assessing the accessibility and estimated value of these experiences.\nConclusion – The rubric seems to be a useful start to assessing experiential learning. However, more research is needed to ensure that it is actually measuring the domains that it is intended to measure. This study only focused on whether the rubric could be applied, whereas future studies should assess its accuracy. The rubric may be useful for curriculum evaluation and planning, accreditation, tenure/promotion, and instructor self-assessment.","PeriodicalId":45227,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rubrics May Be a Useful Tool for Assessing MLIS Student Learning Experiences\",\"authors\":\"J. Koos\",\"doi\":\"10.18438/eblip30109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Review of:\\nAdkins, D., Buchanan, S. A., Bossaller, J. S., Brendler, B. M., Alston, J. K., & Moulaison Sandy, H. (2021). Assessing experiential learning to promote students’ diversity engagement. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 62(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis.2019-0061\\nAbstract\\nObjective – To develop a rubric to assess diversity awareness and professional socialization through in-person or online experiential learning for online MLIS students.\\nDesign – Exploratory case study.\\nSetting – School of Information Science & Learning Technologies, University of Missouri.\\nSubjects – Six experiential learning projects designed to promote diversity and professional socialization for online MLIS students.\\nMethods – The authors developed a rubric in order to evaluate the characteristics of several experiential learning projects. The major themes that were measured in the rubric were identified through a comprehensive literature search, and these included Professional Socialization, Service Orientation, Values Orientation, and Diversity & Inclusion. The authors also added three original accessibility factors that they considered relevant from a practical approach: time, money, and geographic mobility.\\nMain Results – The rubric was successfully applied to several ongoing experiential learning projects, as well as to a new project. The authors concluded that it provided a useful framework for assessing the accessibility and estimated value of these experiences.\\nConclusion – The rubric seems to be a useful start to assessing experiential learning. However, more research is needed to ensure that it is actually measuring the domains that it is intended to measure. This study only focused on whether the rubric could be applied, whereas future studies should assess its accuracy. The rubric may be useful for curriculum evaluation and planning, accreditation, tenure/promotion, and instructor self-assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述:Adkins,D.、Buchanan,S.A.、Bossaller,J.S.、Brendler,B.M.、Alston,J.K.和Moulaison Sandy,H.(2021)。评估体验式学习以促进学生的多样性参与。图书馆与信息科学教育杂志,62(2),201–219。https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis.2019-0061AbstractObjective–为在线MLIS学生制定一个评估多样性意识和职业社会化的准则,通过面对面或在线体验式学习。设计——探索性案例研究。背景——密苏里大学信息科学与学习技术学院。主题——六个体验式学习项目,旨在促进在线MLIS学生的多样性和职业社会化。方法——作者制定了一个量规,以评估几个体验式学习项目的特点。通过全面的文献检索,确定了衡量准则中的主要主题,其中包括职业社会化、服务导向、价值观导向以及多样性和包容性。作者还添加了三个他们认为与实际方法相关的原始可达性因素:时间、金钱和地理流动性。主要结果——该准则成功应用于几个正在进行的体验式学习项目以及一个新项目。作者得出的结论是,它为评估这些经验的可及性和估计价值提供了一个有用的框架。结论——该准则似乎是评估体验式学习的一个有用的开端。然而,还需要更多的研究来确保它实际上是在测量它想要测量的领域。这项研究只关注是否可以应用该准则,而未来的研究应该评估其准确性。该准则可能对课程评估和规划、认证、任期/晋升以及讲师自我评估有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rubrics May Be a Useful Tool for Assessing MLIS Student Learning Experiences
A Review of: Adkins, D., Buchanan, S. A., Bossaller, J. S., Brendler, B. M., Alston, J. K., & Moulaison Sandy, H. (2021). Assessing experiential learning to promote students’ diversity engagement. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 62(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis.2019-0061 Abstract Objective – To develop a rubric to assess diversity awareness and professional socialization through in-person or online experiential learning for online MLIS students. Design – Exploratory case study. Setting – School of Information Science & Learning Technologies, University of Missouri. Subjects – Six experiential learning projects designed to promote diversity and professional socialization for online MLIS students. Methods – The authors developed a rubric in order to evaluate the characteristics of several experiential learning projects. The major themes that were measured in the rubric were identified through a comprehensive literature search, and these included Professional Socialization, Service Orientation, Values Orientation, and Diversity & Inclusion. The authors also added three original accessibility factors that they considered relevant from a practical approach: time, money, and geographic mobility. Main Results – The rubric was successfully applied to several ongoing experiential learning projects, as well as to a new project. The authors concluded that it provided a useful framework for assessing the accessibility and estimated value of these experiences. Conclusion – The rubric seems to be a useful start to assessing experiential learning. However, more research is needed to ensure that it is actually measuring the domains that it is intended to measure. This study only focused on whether the rubric could be applied, whereas future studies should assess its accuracy. The rubric may be useful for curriculum evaluation and planning, accreditation, tenure/promotion, and instructor self-assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信