{"title":"世俗记忆的诗歌:雷兹尼科夫的《卡迪什》和乔治·奥本的《在记忆中的雷兹尼科ff》","authors":"Joseph Ballan","doi":"10.5325/STUDAMERJEWILITE.36.1.0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:In declaring, finally, the superfluity or disposability of “prayers and words and lights” before the presence or memory of a dead loved one, Charles Reznikoff’s “Kaddish” exemplifies a break with the traditional kaddish, and appears to mediate a self-consciously secular memorialization. Yet it does not merely reflect or represent a secular regime as it has developed outside the world of the poem; rather, it labors to articulate an uncertain, yet recognizably Jewish, sensibility of the secular. This sensibility should be understood in the context of the poet’s broader concerns with the modern significance of biblical and post-biblical Judaism, concerns that can be read in the very cycle of which “Kaddish” is the conclusion, the 1941 “Going To and Fro and Walking Up and Down.” In addition, George Oppen’s own poem in memory of Charles Reznikoff enables us to identify an aesthetics of the humble that, intertwined with an ethics of humility, is distinctive of Reznikoff’s work, and that leads to the conclusion that the secular sensibility in “Kaddish” amounts to more than a simple act of negation, a simple disregard or scorn for the trappings of traditional ritual.","PeriodicalId":41533,"journal":{"name":"Studies in American Jewish Literature","volume":"36 1","pages":"71 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poetry of Secular Memorialization: Charles Reznikoff’s “Kaddish” and George Oppen’s “in Memoriam Charles Reznikoff”\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Ballan\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/STUDAMERJEWILITE.36.1.0071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:In declaring, finally, the superfluity or disposability of “prayers and words and lights” before the presence or memory of a dead loved one, Charles Reznikoff’s “Kaddish” exemplifies a break with the traditional kaddish, and appears to mediate a self-consciously secular memorialization. Yet it does not merely reflect or represent a secular regime as it has developed outside the world of the poem; rather, it labors to articulate an uncertain, yet recognizably Jewish, sensibility of the secular. This sensibility should be understood in the context of the poet’s broader concerns with the modern significance of biblical and post-biblical Judaism, concerns that can be read in the very cycle of which “Kaddish” is the conclusion, the 1941 “Going To and Fro and Walking Up and Down.” In addition, George Oppen’s own poem in memory of Charles Reznikoff enables us to identify an aesthetics of the humble that, intertwined with an ethics of humility, is distinctive of Reznikoff’s work, and that leads to the conclusion that the secular sensibility in “Kaddish” amounts to more than a simple act of negation, a simple disregard or scorn for the trappings of traditional ritual.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in American Jewish Literature\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"71 - 83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in American Jewish Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/STUDAMERJEWILITE.36.1.0071\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in American Jewish Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/STUDAMERJEWILITE.36.1.0071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
摘要:查尔斯·雷兹尼科夫(Charles Reznikoff)的《卡迪什》(Kaddish。然而,它不仅仅反映或代表了一个世俗政权,因为它是在诗歌世界之外发展起来的;相反,它努力表达一种不确定但可识别的犹太世俗情感。这种情感应该放在诗人对圣经和后圣经犹太教的现代意义的更广泛关注的背景下理解,这些关注可以在《卡迪什》(Kaddish)作为结论的1941年《去与霜》(Going To and Fro and Walking Up and Down)这一循环中解读。此外,乔治·奥本(George Oppen)自己为纪念查尔斯·雷兹尼科夫(Charles Reznikoff。
Poetry of Secular Memorialization: Charles Reznikoff’s “Kaddish” and George Oppen’s “in Memoriam Charles Reznikoff”
ABSTRACT:In declaring, finally, the superfluity or disposability of “prayers and words and lights” before the presence or memory of a dead loved one, Charles Reznikoff’s “Kaddish” exemplifies a break with the traditional kaddish, and appears to mediate a self-consciously secular memorialization. Yet it does not merely reflect or represent a secular regime as it has developed outside the world of the poem; rather, it labors to articulate an uncertain, yet recognizably Jewish, sensibility of the secular. This sensibility should be understood in the context of the poet’s broader concerns with the modern significance of biblical and post-biblical Judaism, concerns that can be read in the very cycle of which “Kaddish” is the conclusion, the 1941 “Going To and Fro and Walking Up and Down.” In addition, George Oppen’s own poem in memory of Charles Reznikoff enables us to identify an aesthetics of the humble that, intertwined with an ethics of humility, is distinctive of Reznikoff’s work, and that leads to the conclusion that the secular sensibility in “Kaddish” amounts to more than a simple act of negation, a simple disregard or scorn for the trappings of traditional ritual.