{"title":"英国莫里斯家族的历史","authors":"Vic Gammon","doi":"10.1080/04308778.2019.1599211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a very worthwhile volume. Like any such compilation, the contributions are variable in quality but none are without interest and some are very good indeed. Strong foundations have been laid for English morris dance history, for example, in the writings of Roy Judge, Keith Chandler and two of the writers represented here, John Forrest and the editor Michael Heaney. The book is organized thematically and roughly chronologically into seven sections varying from one to four chapters. It is extremely well presented and edited. After a brief but to-the-point introduction by Heaney, which addresses the plural ‘histories’ of the title, John Forrest contributes a lively and informative first essay, ‘How to Read The History of Morris Dancing’. This essay helps us to think about the important issues pertinent to the whole book. Forrest gives some fascinating background on the way that he, Chandler and Heaney carved up the field of morris dance history, researching different but complementary aspects. Forrest’s essay is peppered with pithy and pointed statements. Writing about the widespread belief that morris was the survival of an ancient fertility ritual (for which there is no historical evidence) he states:","PeriodicalId":51989,"journal":{"name":"Folk Life-Journal of Ethnological Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/04308778.2019.1599211","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The histories of the Morris in Britain\",\"authors\":\"Vic Gammon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/04308778.2019.1599211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is a very worthwhile volume. Like any such compilation, the contributions are variable in quality but none are without interest and some are very good indeed. Strong foundations have been laid for English morris dance history, for example, in the writings of Roy Judge, Keith Chandler and two of the writers represented here, John Forrest and the editor Michael Heaney. The book is organized thematically and roughly chronologically into seven sections varying from one to four chapters. It is extremely well presented and edited. After a brief but to-the-point introduction by Heaney, which addresses the plural ‘histories’ of the title, John Forrest contributes a lively and informative first essay, ‘How to Read The History of Morris Dancing’. This essay helps us to think about the important issues pertinent to the whole book. Forrest gives some fascinating background on the way that he, Chandler and Heaney carved up the field of morris dance history, researching different but complementary aspects. Forrest’s essay is peppered with pithy and pointed statements. Writing about the widespread belief that morris was the survival of an ancient fertility ritual (for which there is no historical evidence) he states:\",\"PeriodicalId\":51989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Folk Life-Journal of Ethnological Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/04308778.2019.1599211\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Folk Life-Journal of Ethnological Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/04308778.2019.1599211\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FOLKLORE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folk Life-Journal of Ethnological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/04308778.2019.1599211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
This is a very worthwhile volume. Like any such compilation, the contributions are variable in quality but none are without interest and some are very good indeed. Strong foundations have been laid for English morris dance history, for example, in the writings of Roy Judge, Keith Chandler and two of the writers represented here, John Forrest and the editor Michael Heaney. The book is organized thematically and roughly chronologically into seven sections varying from one to four chapters. It is extremely well presented and edited. After a brief but to-the-point introduction by Heaney, which addresses the plural ‘histories’ of the title, John Forrest contributes a lively and informative first essay, ‘How to Read The History of Morris Dancing’. This essay helps us to think about the important issues pertinent to the whole book. Forrest gives some fascinating background on the way that he, Chandler and Heaney carved up the field of morris dance history, researching different but complementary aspects. Forrest’s essay is peppered with pithy and pointed statements. Writing about the widespread belief that morris was the survival of an ancient fertility ritual (for which there is no historical evidence) he states:
期刊介绍:
Folk Life: Journal of Ethnological Studies is a journal devoted to the study of all aspects of traditional ways of life in Great Britain and Ireland. The journal publishes original, high quality, peer-reviewed research in the form of unsolicited articles, solicited papers (which are usually selected from those read at the Society"s annual conference) and of members" papers (which are usually short reports of work in progress). Work published in Folk Life may include, for example, papers dealing with the traditional ways of life of other countries and regions, which may be compared to or contrasted with those of Great Britain and Ireland.