数学满意度问卷的构建与验证:探索性和验证性因素分析

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Andie Tangonan Capinding
{"title":"数学满意度问卷的构建与验证:探索性和验证性因素分析","authors":"Andie Tangonan Capinding","doi":"10.33225/pec/23.81.327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mathematics satisfaction can drive students to work harder in math class. Thus, it is vital to assess the satisfaction of learners using an instrument to intervene in the teaching and learning process. There are research studies that have independently developed questionnaires to measure students' mathematics satisfaction, but most of them focused on students' satisfaction with mathematical resources and online mathematics courses. Thus, previously developed instruments had limitations. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a mathematical satisfaction questionnaire for students. Face validation, content validation, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability testing were used in the study to construct and validate the instrument. The initial draft of the mathematical satisfaction questionnaire has 44 items divided into five categories: skill, real-life, academic, praise, and task completion. The study's sample included 317 students from the Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology – Gabaldon campus. The content validity of the test was assessed by ten instructors and professors using Aiken's V technique. The construct validity was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Aiken's V coefficient ranged from 0.73-0.87, which is adequate for the content validity index. Every construct has an acceptable reliability coefficient. Eight items were removed following EFA. Construct validation confirmed 36 items distributed among the five mathematical satisfaction constructs. The final instrument is reliable and can be used to assess students' mathematical satisfaction.\nKeywords: Item measurement, mathematical satisfaction, reliability test, validity test","PeriodicalId":44900,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Education in the 21st Century","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONSTRUCTION AND VALIDATION OF MATHEMATICAL SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE: AN EXPLORATORY AND CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS\",\"authors\":\"Andie Tangonan Capinding\",\"doi\":\"10.33225/pec/23.81.327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mathematics satisfaction can drive students to work harder in math class. Thus, it is vital to assess the satisfaction of learners using an instrument to intervene in the teaching and learning process. There are research studies that have independently developed questionnaires to measure students' mathematics satisfaction, but most of them focused on students' satisfaction with mathematical resources and online mathematics courses. Thus, previously developed instruments had limitations. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a mathematical satisfaction questionnaire for students. Face validation, content validation, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability testing were used in the study to construct and validate the instrument. The initial draft of the mathematical satisfaction questionnaire has 44 items divided into five categories: skill, real-life, academic, praise, and task completion. The study's sample included 317 students from the Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology – Gabaldon campus. The content validity of the test was assessed by ten instructors and professors using Aiken's V technique. The construct validity was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Aiken's V coefficient ranged from 0.73-0.87, which is adequate for the content validity index. Every construct has an acceptable reliability coefficient. Eight items were removed following EFA. Construct validation confirmed 36 items distributed among the five mathematical satisfaction constructs. The final instrument is reliable and can be used to assess students' mathematical satisfaction.\\nKeywords: Item measurement, mathematical satisfaction, reliability test, validity test\",\"PeriodicalId\":44900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problems of Education in the 21st Century\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problems of Education in the 21st Century\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/23.81.327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Education in the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/23.81.327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数学满意度可以促使学生在数学课上更加努力。因此,使用工具干预教学过程来评估学习者的满意度至关重要。有研究独立开发了问卷来衡量学生的数学满意度,但大多集中在学生对数学资源和在线数学课程的满意度上。因此,以前制定的文书有局限性。本研究的目的是为学生开发和验证一份数学满意度问卷。研究中使用了人脸验证、内容验证、探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析和可靠性测试来构建和验证仪器。数学满意度调查表初稿共有44个项目,分为五类:技能、现实生活、学术、表扬和任务完成。这项研究的样本包括来自纽埃瓦-埃奇亚科技大学Gabaldon校区的317名学生。10名教师和教授使用Aiken的V技术对测试的内容有效性进行了评估。结构有效性采用探索性和验证性因素分析进行检验。Aiken的V系数在0.73-0.87之间,这对于内容有效性指数来说是足够的。每个结构都有一个可接受的可靠性系数。全民教育后删除了8个项目。构念验证确认了分布在五个数学满意度构念中的36个项目。最终的仪器是可靠的,可以用来评估学生的数学满意度。关键词:项目测量、数学满意度、信度检验、有效性检验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CONSTRUCTION AND VALIDATION OF MATHEMATICAL SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE: AN EXPLORATORY AND CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS
Mathematics satisfaction can drive students to work harder in math class. Thus, it is vital to assess the satisfaction of learners using an instrument to intervene in the teaching and learning process. There are research studies that have independently developed questionnaires to measure students' mathematics satisfaction, but most of them focused on students' satisfaction with mathematical resources and online mathematics courses. Thus, previously developed instruments had limitations. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a mathematical satisfaction questionnaire for students. Face validation, content validation, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability testing were used in the study to construct and validate the instrument. The initial draft of the mathematical satisfaction questionnaire has 44 items divided into five categories: skill, real-life, academic, praise, and task completion. The study's sample included 317 students from the Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology – Gabaldon campus. The content validity of the test was assessed by ten instructors and professors using Aiken's V technique. The construct validity was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Aiken's V coefficient ranged from 0.73-0.87, which is adequate for the content validity index. Every construct has an acceptable reliability coefficient. Eight items were removed following EFA. Construct validation confirmed 36 items distributed among the five mathematical satisfaction constructs. The final instrument is reliable and can be used to assess students' mathematical satisfaction. Keywords: Item measurement, mathematical satisfaction, reliability test, validity test
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Problems of Education in the 21st Century
Problems of Education in the 21st Century EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
14.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Problems of Education in the 21st Century is an international, periodical scientific journal publishing original research across the whole of education. The journal''s Editorial Board and staff are committed to building PEC into the leading scientific journal in its field by publishing articles of outstanding scientific quality that merit the attention and interest of the whole educational community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信