中学实验室工作研究的系统综述

IF 4.7 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Studies in Science Education Pub Date : 2022-06-23 DOI:10.1080/03057267.2022.2090125

N. Gericke, P. Högström, J. Wallin

{"title":"中学实验室工作研究的系统综述","authors":"N. Gericke, P. Högström, J. Wallin","doi":"10.1080/03057267.2022.2090125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We present an integrative mixed-methods systematic review of research on laboratory work in secondary-school science education from 1996 to 2019. The aim of the study is to identify important aspects of how to successfully make use of laboratory work as a science-teaching strategy in secondary schools. By engaging teachers, our study uses a demand-driven approach where the users of evidence participate in setting the scope. Of a sample of 11,771 studies, 39 were selected for the integrative analysis. The result is structured around three theoretical frameworks to inform our understanding of what characterises laboratory work, (1) with the aim of developing students’ learning of science, (2) with the aim of developing students’ learning to do science (science practices), and (3) regarding the level of inquiry that facilitates aims 1 and 2. The results are discussed in the light of previous research reviews, and recommendations for future research are suggested.","PeriodicalId":49262,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Science Education","volume":"59 1","pages":"245 - 285"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of research on laboratory work in secondary school\",\"authors\":\"N. Gericke, P. Högström, J. Wallin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03057267.2022.2090125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We present an integrative mixed-methods systematic review of research on laboratory work in secondary-school science education from 1996 to 2019. The aim of the study is to identify important aspects of how to successfully make use of laboratory work as a science-teaching strategy in secondary schools. By engaging teachers, our study uses a demand-driven approach where the users of evidence participate in setting the scope. Of a sample of 11,771 studies, 39 were selected for the integrative analysis. The result is structured around three theoretical frameworks to inform our understanding of what characterises laboratory work, (1) with the aim of developing students’ learning of science, (2) with the aim of developing students’ learning to do science (science practices), and (3) regarding the level of inquiry that facilitates aims 1 and 2. The results are discussed in the light of previous research reviews, and recommendations for future research are suggested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Science Education\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"245 - 285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2090125\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2090125","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 17

摘要

摘要：我们对1996-2019年中学科学教育实验室工作的研究进行了综合混合方法的系统回顾。本研究的目的是确定如何成功利用实验室工作作为中学科学教学策略的重要方面。通过让教师参与进来，我们的研究使用了一种需求驱动的方法，即证据使用者参与设定范围。在11771项研究的样本中，选择了39项进行综合分析。该结果围绕三个理论框架构建，以帮助我们理解实验室工作的特点，（1）旨在培养学生的科学学习能力，（2）旨在培养他们学习科学（科学实践）的能力，以及（3）关于促进目标1和目标2的探究水平。根据以往的研究综述对结果进行了讨论，并对未来的研究提出了建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A systematic review of research on laboratory work in secondary school

ABSTRACT We present an integrative mixed-methods systematic review of research on laboratory work in secondary-school science education from 1996 to 2019. The aim of the study is to identify important aspects of how to successfully make use of laboratory work as a science-teaching strategy in secondary schools. By engaging teachers, our study uses a demand-driven approach where the users of evidence participate in setting the scope. Of a sample of 11,771 studies, 39 were selected for the integrative analysis. The result is structured around three theoretical frameworks to inform our understanding of what characterises laboratory work, (1) with the aim of developing students’ learning of science, (2) with the aim of developing students’ learning to do science (science practices), and (3) regarding the level of inquiry that facilitates aims 1 and 2. The results are discussed in the light of previous research reviews, and recommendations for future research are suggested.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Studies in Science Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-

CiteScore

15.30

自引率

2.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The central aim of Studies in Science Education is to publish review articles of the highest quality which provide analytical syntheses of research into key topics and issues in science education. In addressing this aim, the Editor and Editorial Advisory Board, are guided by a commitment to: maintaining and developing the highest standards of scholarship associated with the journal; publishing articles from as wide a range of authors as possible, in relation both to professional background and country of origin; publishing articles which serve both to consolidate and reflect upon existing fields of study and to promote new areas for research activity. Studies in Science Education will be of interest to all those involved in science education including: science education researchers, doctoral and masters students; science teachers at elementary, high school and university levels; science education policy makers; science education curriculum developers and text book writers. Articles featured in Studies in Science Education have been made available either following invitation from the Editor or through potential contributors offering pieces. Given the substantial nature of the review articles, the Editor is willing to give informal feedback on the suitability of proposals though all contributions, whether invited or not, are subject to full peer review. A limited number of books of special interest and concern to those involved in science education are normally reviewed in each volume.