澳大利亚教育背景下的争议性问题:政治、政策和实践的维度

IF 1.4 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Amy Mcpherson, Daniella J. Forster, Kylie Kerr
{"title":"澳大利亚教育背景下的争议性问题:政治、政策和实践的维度","authors":"Amy Mcpherson, Daniella J. Forster, Kylie Kerr","doi":"10.1080/1359866X.2022.2152310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In recent years, a number of controversies related to climate change, racism and Black Lives Matter, and gender and sexual diversity have characterised public debate in Australia about politically charged content in schools. This paper explores one jurisdiction’s “Controversial Issues in Schools” policy through three broad areas of discussion. We begin by analysing the current social and political context in Australia at both a state and national level to consider how debates around controversial issues in schools have been utilised to exploit both existing and emerging cultural divisions. We then examine some of the philosophical claims central to the “Controversial Issues in Schools” policy before considering a single case of teacher deliberation in relation to the policy. The paper argues that the policy does little to support teachers in bringing up controversial issues in the classroom particularly given the ways teacher conduct in relation to controversial issues is treated in public discourse. Engaging with controversial issues as a matter of teacher conduct fails to acknowledge the epistemic, ethical, and political nature of controversial issues and teachers’ deliberation in relation to such concerns and constructs teacher conduct as a central concern.","PeriodicalId":47276,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"113 - 127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controversial issues in the Australian educational context: dimension of politics, policy and practice\",\"authors\":\"Amy Mcpherson, Daniella J. Forster, Kylie Kerr\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1359866X.2022.2152310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In recent years, a number of controversies related to climate change, racism and Black Lives Matter, and gender and sexual diversity have characterised public debate in Australia about politically charged content in schools. This paper explores one jurisdiction’s “Controversial Issues in Schools” policy through three broad areas of discussion. We begin by analysing the current social and political context in Australia at both a state and national level to consider how debates around controversial issues in schools have been utilised to exploit both existing and emerging cultural divisions. We then examine some of the philosophical claims central to the “Controversial Issues in Schools” policy before considering a single case of teacher deliberation in relation to the policy. The paper argues that the policy does little to support teachers in bringing up controversial issues in the classroom particularly given the ways teacher conduct in relation to controversial issues is treated in public discourse. Engaging with controversial issues as a matter of teacher conduct fails to acknowledge the epistemic, ethical, and political nature of controversial issues and teachers’ deliberation in relation to such concerns and constructs teacher conduct as a central concern.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"113 - 127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2022.2152310\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2022.2152310","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要近年来,澳大利亚公众就学校中充满政治色彩的内容展开辩论,其中包括气候变化、种族主义和黑人的生命至关重要以及性别和性多样性等方面的争议。本文通过三个广泛的讨论领域探讨了一个司法管辖区的“学校争议问题”政策。我们首先从州和国家层面分析澳大利亚当前的社会和政治背景,以考虑如何利用学校中围绕争议问题的辩论来利用现有和新兴的文化分歧。然后,我们研究了“学校中的争议性问题”政策的一些核心哲学主张,然后再考虑一个与该政策相关的教师审议案例。该论文认为,该政策对支持教师在课堂上提出有争议的问题几乎没有作用,特别是考虑到教师在公共话语中处理与有争议问题有关的行为的方式。将有争议的问题作为教师行为的一个问题来处理,没有认识到有争议问题的认识、伦理和政治性质,也没有认识到教师对这些问题的思考,并将教师行为视为一个核心问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controversial issues in the Australian educational context: dimension of politics, policy and practice
ABSTRACT In recent years, a number of controversies related to climate change, racism and Black Lives Matter, and gender and sexual diversity have characterised public debate in Australia about politically charged content in schools. This paper explores one jurisdiction’s “Controversial Issues in Schools” policy through three broad areas of discussion. We begin by analysing the current social and political context in Australia at both a state and national level to consider how debates around controversial issues in schools have been utilised to exploit both existing and emerging cultural divisions. We then examine some of the philosophical claims central to the “Controversial Issues in Schools” policy before considering a single case of teacher deliberation in relation to the policy. The paper argues that the policy does little to support teachers in bringing up controversial issues in the classroom particularly given the ways teacher conduct in relation to controversial issues is treated in public discourse. Engaging with controversial issues as a matter of teacher conduct fails to acknowledge the epistemic, ethical, and political nature of controversial issues and teachers’ deliberation in relation to such concerns and constructs teacher conduct as a central concern.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: This journal promotes rigorous research that makes a significant contribution to advancing knowledge in teacher education across early childhood, primary, secondary, vocational education and training, and higher education. The journal editors invite for peer review theoretically informed papers - including, but not limited to, empirically grounded research - which focus on significant issues relevant to an international audience in regards to: Teacher education (including initial teacher education and ongoing professional education) of teachers internationally; The cultural, economic, political, social and/or technological dimensions and contexts of teacher education; Change, stability, reform and resistance in (and relating to) teacher education; Improving the quality and impact of research in teacher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信