迈克尔·劳伦斯·狄金森(Michael Lawrence Dickinson)的《快死了:大西洋黑人城市中的奴隶制和社会重生》,1680-1807年(评论)

IF 1.1 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
M. Dantas
{"title":"迈克尔·劳伦斯·狄金森(Michael Lawrence Dickinson)的《快死了:大西洋黑人城市中的奴隶制和社会重生》,1680-1807年(评论)","authors":"M. Dantas","doi":"10.1353/wmq.2023.a903168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of social death, developed by sociologist Orlando Patterson in his now-classic book Slavery and Social Death, continues to loom large in debates about early modern Atlantic slavery.1 Numerous scholars have engaged with Patterson’s work to make sense of enslavement and its impact on the enslaved individual.2 This literature has left us with a very clear picture of the exploitation, brutalization, denial of rights, and indeed denial of personhood that enslaved Africans and their descendants endured. Their treatment and the place they were forced to occupy in the slavery-based economic system that shaped our modern age produced such alienation from society that, even if they did not succumb to physical death, they became, as Patterson explains, socially dead. Patterson’s work has also offered a generative conceptual starting point for these scholars to explore the ways in which enslaved people, individually and collectively, survived and pushed back against the violent realities of enslavement. In Almost Dead, Michael Lawrence Dickinson contributes to that effort. He does so by exploring the analytic potential of the idea of social rebirth articulated by, among others, Stephanie E. Smallwood in her book Saltwater Slavery.3 Smallwood uses the term to encapsulate the social and cultural dynamics Africans engaged in to survive the dehumanization and alienation they suffered during the Atlantic slave trade. Dickinson applies social rebirth to a discussion of Black survival in urban Anglo-America—specifically Bridgetown, Kingston, and Philadelphia— from the late seventeenth through the early nineteenth century. Throughout the book’s five chapters, Dickinson demonstrates that, if slavery inflicted a","PeriodicalId":51566,"journal":{"name":"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Almost Dead: Slavery and Social Rebirth in the Black Urban Atlantic, 1680–1807 by Michael Lawrence Dickinson (review)\",\"authors\":\"M. Dantas\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/wmq.2023.a903168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of social death, developed by sociologist Orlando Patterson in his now-classic book Slavery and Social Death, continues to loom large in debates about early modern Atlantic slavery.1 Numerous scholars have engaged with Patterson’s work to make sense of enslavement and its impact on the enslaved individual.2 This literature has left us with a very clear picture of the exploitation, brutalization, denial of rights, and indeed denial of personhood that enslaved Africans and their descendants endured. Their treatment and the place they were forced to occupy in the slavery-based economic system that shaped our modern age produced such alienation from society that, even if they did not succumb to physical death, they became, as Patterson explains, socially dead. Patterson’s work has also offered a generative conceptual starting point for these scholars to explore the ways in which enslaved people, individually and collectively, survived and pushed back against the violent realities of enslavement. In Almost Dead, Michael Lawrence Dickinson contributes to that effort. He does so by exploring the analytic potential of the idea of social rebirth articulated by, among others, Stephanie E. Smallwood in her book Saltwater Slavery.3 Smallwood uses the term to encapsulate the social and cultural dynamics Africans engaged in to survive the dehumanization and alienation they suffered during the Atlantic slave trade. Dickinson applies social rebirth to a discussion of Black survival in urban Anglo-America—specifically Bridgetown, Kingston, and Philadelphia— from the late seventeenth through the early nineteenth century. Throughout the book’s five chapters, Dickinson demonstrates that, if slavery inflicted a\",\"PeriodicalId\":51566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/wmq.2023.a903168\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wmq.2023.a903168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会学家奥兰多·帕特森(Orlando Patterson)在其现在的经典著作《奴隶制与社会死亡》(Slavery and social death)中提出的社会死亡概念,在关于早期现代大西洋奴隶制的辩论中继续占据重要地位。1许多学者参与了帕特森的工作,以理解奴役及其对被奴役者的影响,被奴役的非洲人及其后代所忍受的残暴、剥夺权利,甚至剥夺人格。他们的待遇以及他们在塑造我们现代社会的以奴隶制为基础的经济体系中被迫占据的地位,产生了与社会的疏离感,即使他们没有屈服于肉体上的死亡,正如帕特森所解释的那样,他们也会在社会上死亡。帕特森的工作也为这些学者提供了一个生成性的概念起点,以探索被奴役的人,无论是个人还是集体,如何生存并反抗奴役的暴力现实。在《快死了》中,迈克尔·劳伦斯·狄金森为这一努力做出了贡献。他通过探索斯蒂芬妮·E·斯莫尔伍德(Stephanie E.Smallwood)等人在《盐水奴隶制》(Saltwater Slavery)一书中阐述的社会重生思想的分析潜力来做到这一点。3斯莫尔伍德用这个词概括了非洲人在大西洋奴隶贸易中遭受的非人化和异化中所参与的社会和文化动态。迪金森将社会再生应用于17世纪末至19世纪初英美城市——特别是布里奇敦、金斯敦和费城——黑人生存的讨论。在这本书的五章中,狄金森证明,如果奴隶制造成了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Almost Dead: Slavery and Social Rebirth in the Black Urban Atlantic, 1680–1807 by Michael Lawrence Dickinson (review)
The concept of social death, developed by sociologist Orlando Patterson in his now-classic book Slavery and Social Death, continues to loom large in debates about early modern Atlantic slavery.1 Numerous scholars have engaged with Patterson’s work to make sense of enslavement and its impact on the enslaved individual.2 This literature has left us with a very clear picture of the exploitation, brutalization, denial of rights, and indeed denial of personhood that enslaved Africans and their descendants endured. Their treatment and the place they were forced to occupy in the slavery-based economic system that shaped our modern age produced such alienation from society that, even if they did not succumb to physical death, they became, as Patterson explains, socially dead. Patterson’s work has also offered a generative conceptual starting point for these scholars to explore the ways in which enslaved people, individually and collectively, survived and pushed back against the violent realities of enslavement. In Almost Dead, Michael Lawrence Dickinson contributes to that effort. He does so by exploring the analytic potential of the idea of social rebirth articulated by, among others, Stephanie E. Smallwood in her book Saltwater Slavery.3 Smallwood uses the term to encapsulate the social and cultural dynamics Africans engaged in to survive the dehumanization and alienation they suffered during the Atlantic slave trade. Dickinson applies social rebirth to a discussion of Black survival in urban Anglo-America—specifically Bridgetown, Kingston, and Philadelphia— from the late seventeenth through the early nineteenth century. Throughout the book’s five chapters, Dickinson demonstrates that, if slavery inflicted a
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信