山本新头针对健康人的安全性及其与肩强直、诊断点和刺激点的关系

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Tetsuharu Kamiya, Takuya Suematsu, F. Omata, Sachie Kasukabe, Manami Suzuki, S. Kaneko, S. Takayama, T. Ishii
{"title":"山本新头针对健康人的安全性及其与肩强直、诊断点和刺激点的关系","authors":"Tetsuharu Kamiya, Takuya Suematsu, F. Omata, Sachie Kasukabe, Manami Suzuki, S. Kaneko, S. Takayama, T. Ishii","doi":"10.3727/036012921X16164310686743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture (YNSA) has been used in clinical practice for pain symptoms worldwide. However, the safety of YNSA and the role of the diagnosis and stimulation points have never been investigated. This study aimed to investigate the safety of YNSA and the relationship\n between the diagnosis points, the stimulation points, and changes in shoulder stiffness. YNSA was performed at the shoulder point A, acupuncture at the non-shoulder point D, and no intervention as a control in 15 healthy participants three times with a washout period of 1 week. Adverse reactions\n (changes in blood pressure, changes in heart rate, or bleeding), objective evaluation of the pressure pain threshold (PPT) and muscle hardness (MH) scores at the shoulder, and subjective evaluation of shoulder stiffness with a visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded before, during, and 20\n min after stimulation. In the safety evaluation, no adverse reactions such as hypotension, bradycardia, or bleeding/hematoma were observed. PPT and MH revealed no significant difference between the conditions. There was a significant difference in the VAS between all three conditions (p\n = 0.039). Post-hoc analysis showed a significant difference between controls and D-point stimulation (p = 0.034), but no significant difference between A- and D-point stimulation. VAS subanalysis and post-hoc analysis in right-LI4-positive subjects (n = 4) showed a significant difference\n in VAS between A-point stimulation and controls (p = 0.01, 0.015, respectively). Our pilot investigation exhibited the safety of YNSA. Diagnosis and stimulation points may relate to changes in shoulder stiffness; however, further comparative studies with YNSA are required.","PeriodicalId":50881,"journal":{"name":"Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research","volume":"46 1","pages":"111-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture in Healthy Subjects and the Relationship Between Shoulder Stiffness, Diagnosis Points, and Stimulation Points\",\"authors\":\"Tetsuharu Kamiya, Takuya Suematsu, F. Omata, Sachie Kasukabe, Manami Suzuki, S. Kaneko, S. Takayama, T. Ishii\",\"doi\":\"10.3727/036012921X16164310686743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture (YNSA) has been used in clinical practice for pain symptoms worldwide. However, the safety of YNSA and the role of the diagnosis and stimulation points have never been investigated. This study aimed to investigate the safety of YNSA and the relationship\\n between the diagnosis points, the stimulation points, and changes in shoulder stiffness. YNSA was performed at the shoulder point A, acupuncture at the non-shoulder point D, and no intervention as a control in 15 healthy participants three times with a washout period of 1 week. Adverse reactions\\n (changes in blood pressure, changes in heart rate, or bleeding), objective evaluation of the pressure pain threshold (PPT) and muscle hardness (MH) scores at the shoulder, and subjective evaluation of shoulder stiffness with a visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded before, during, and 20\\n min after stimulation. In the safety evaluation, no adverse reactions such as hypotension, bradycardia, or bleeding/hematoma were observed. PPT and MH revealed no significant difference between the conditions. There was a significant difference in the VAS between all three conditions (p\\n = 0.039). Post-hoc analysis showed a significant difference between controls and D-point stimulation (p = 0.034), but no significant difference between A- and D-point stimulation. VAS subanalysis and post-hoc analysis in right-LI4-positive subjects (n = 4) showed a significant difference\\n in VAS between A-point stimulation and controls (p = 0.01, 0.015, respectively). Our pilot investigation exhibited the safety of YNSA. Diagnosis and stimulation points may relate to changes in shoulder stiffness; however, further comparative studies with YNSA are required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"111-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3727/036012921X16164310686743\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3727/036012921X16164310686743","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

山本新头针(YNSA)已在全球范围内用于治疗疼痛症状的临床实践。然而,YNSA的安全性以及诊断和刺激点的作用从未被研究过。本研究旨在探讨YNSA的安全性以及诊断点、刺激点和肩部硬度变化之间的关系。在肩部A点进行YNSA,在非肩部D点进行针灸,在15名健康参与者中进行三次不干预的对照,冲洗期为1周。在刺激之前、期间和20分钟后,记录不良反应(血压变化、心率变化或出血)、肩部压痛阈值(PPT)和肌肉硬度(MH)评分的客观评估,以及用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对肩部硬度的主观评估。在安全性评估中,未观察到低血压、心动过缓或出血/血肿等不良反应。PPT和MH显示两种条件之间没有显著差异。所有三种情况下的VAS均有显著差异(p=0.039)。事后分析显示,对照组和D点刺激组之间有显著差异(p=0.034),但a点和D点激励组之间没有显著差异。右侧-LI4阳性受试者(n=4)的VAS亚分析和事后分析显示,a点刺激和对照组之间的VAS存在显著差异(分别为p=0.01和0.015)。我们的试点调查显示了YNSA的安全性。诊断和刺激点可能与肩部僵硬的变化有关;然而,还需要与YNSA进行进一步的比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety of Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture in Healthy Subjects and the Relationship Between Shoulder Stiffness, Diagnosis Points, and Stimulation Points
Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture (YNSA) has been used in clinical practice for pain symptoms worldwide. However, the safety of YNSA and the role of the diagnosis and stimulation points have never been investigated. This study aimed to investigate the safety of YNSA and the relationship between the diagnosis points, the stimulation points, and changes in shoulder stiffness. YNSA was performed at the shoulder point A, acupuncture at the non-shoulder point D, and no intervention as a control in 15 healthy participants three times with a washout period of 1 week. Adverse reactions (changes in blood pressure, changes in heart rate, or bleeding), objective evaluation of the pressure pain threshold (PPT) and muscle hardness (MH) scores at the shoulder, and subjective evaluation of shoulder stiffness with a visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded before, during, and 20 min after stimulation. In the safety evaluation, no adverse reactions such as hypotension, bradycardia, or bleeding/hematoma were observed. PPT and MH revealed no significant difference between the conditions. There was a significant difference in the VAS between all three conditions (p = 0.039). Post-hoc analysis showed a significant difference between controls and D-point stimulation (p = 0.034), but no significant difference between A- and D-point stimulation. VAS subanalysis and post-hoc analysis in right-LI4-positive subjects (n = 4) showed a significant difference in VAS between A-point stimulation and controls (p = 0.01, 0.015, respectively). Our pilot investigation exhibited the safety of YNSA. Diagnosis and stimulation points may relate to changes in shoulder stiffness; however, further comparative studies with YNSA are required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research
Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
66.70%
发文量
9
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide an international forum for the exchange of ideas and promotion of basic and clinical research in acupuncture, electro-therapeutics, and related fields. The journal was established in order to make acupuncture and electro-therapeutics a universally acceptable branch of medicine through multidisciplinary research based on scientific disciplines. The final goal is to provide a better understanding of both the beneficial and adverse effects of these treatments in order to supplement or improve existing methods of diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases in both Western and Oriental medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信