网络安全中的价值冲突研究综述

Markus Christen, Bert Gordijn, Karsten Weber, Ibo van de Poel, Emad Yaghmaei
{"title":"网络安全中的价值冲突研究综述","authors":"Markus Christen,&nbsp;Bert Gordijn,&nbsp;Karsten Weber,&nbsp;Ibo van de Poel,&nbsp;Emad Yaghmaei","doi":"10.29297/orbit.v1i1.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cybersecurity is of capital importance in a world where economic and social processes increasingly rely on digital technology. Although the primary ethical motivation of cybersecurity is prevention of informational or physical harm, its enforcement can also entail conflicts with other moral values. This contribution provides an outline of value conflicts in cybersecurity based on a quantitative literature analysis and qualitative case studies. The aim is to demonstrate that the security-privacy- dichotomy—that still seems to dominate the ethics discourse based on our bibliometric analysis—is insufficient when discussing the ethical challenges of cybersecurity. Furthermore, we want to sketch how the notion of contextual integrity could help to better understand and mitigate such value conflicts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101247,"journal":{"name":"The ORBIT Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2515856220300705/pdf?md5=4d18bf63d652af956546625cc2bcfa3e&pid=1-s2.0-S2515856220300705-main.pdf","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of Value-Conflicts in Cybersecurity\",\"authors\":\"Markus Christen,&nbsp;Bert Gordijn,&nbsp;Karsten Weber,&nbsp;Ibo van de Poel,&nbsp;Emad Yaghmaei\",\"doi\":\"10.29297/orbit.v1i1.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cybersecurity is of capital importance in a world where economic and social processes increasingly rely on digital technology. Although the primary ethical motivation of cybersecurity is prevention of informational or physical harm, its enforcement can also entail conflicts with other moral values. This contribution provides an outline of value conflicts in cybersecurity based on a quantitative literature analysis and qualitative case studies. The aim is to demonstrate that the security-privacy- dichotomy—that still seems to dominate the ethics discourse based on our bibliometric analysis—is insufficient when discussing the ethical challenges of cybersecurity. Furthermore, we want to sketch how the notion of contextual integrity could help to better understand and mitigate such value conflicts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The ORBIT Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2515856220300705/pdf?md5=4d18bf63d652af956546625cc2bcfa3e&pid=1-s2.0-S2515856220300705-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The ORBIT Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2515856220300705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The ORBIT Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2515856220300705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

在一个经济和社会进程日益依赖数字技术的世界里,网络安全至关重要。尽管网络安全的主要伦理动机是防止信息或人身伤害,但其实施也可能导致与其他道德价值观的冲突。这篇文章在定量文献分析和定性案例研究的基础上概述了网络安全中的价值冲突。其目的是证明,基于我们的文献计量分析,安全-隐私-二分法似乎仍然主导着伦理话语,在讨论网络安全的伦理挑战时是不够的。此外,我们想概述上下文完整性的概念如何帮助更好地理解和减轻这种价值冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Review of Value-Conflicts in Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity is of capital importance in a world where economic and social processes increasingly rely on digital technology. Although the primary ethical motivation of cybersecurity is prevention of informational or physical harm, its enforcement can also entail conflicts with other moral values. This contribution provides an outline of value conflicts in cybersecurity based on a quantitative literature analysis and qualitative case studies. The aim is to demonstrate that the security-privacy- dichotomy—that still seems to dominate the ethics discourse based on our bibliometric analysis—is insufficient when discussing the ethical challenges of cybersecurity. Furthermore, we want to sketch how the notion of contextual integrity could help to better understand and mitigate such value conflicts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信