第三集:加州诉德州

IF 0.5 4区社会学 Q3 LAW

American Journal of Law & Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1017/amj.2022.6

J. Watson

{"title":"第三集:加州诉德州","authors":"J. Watson","doi":"10.1017/amj.2022.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Episode III:California v. Texas—On June 21, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court issued their long-awaited decision on California v. Texas, “the third installment in the epic trilogy” of cases challenging the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”).1 In a 7-to-2 decision authored by Justice Breyer, the Court found that both the individual plaintiffs and the states lacked standing to challenge the constitutionality of the so-called individual mandate.2","PeriodicalId":7680,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","volume":"47 1","pages":"507 - 512"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Episode III: California v. Texas\",\"authors\":\"J. Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/amj.2022.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Episode III:California v. Texas—On June 21, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court issued their long-awaited decision on California v. Texas, “the third installment in the epic trilogy” of cases challenging the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”).1 In a 7-to-2 decision authored by Justice Breyer, the Court found that both the individual plaintiffs and the states lacked standing to challenge the constitutionality of the so-called individual mandate.2\",\"PeriodicalId\":7680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Law & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"507 - 512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Law & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/amj.2022.6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/amj.2022.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

第三集：加利福尼亚州诉德克萨斯州——2021年6月21日，美国最高法院就加利福尼亚州诉得克萨斯州一案发布了他们期待已久的裁决，这是挑战《患者保护和平价医疗法案》（“ACA”）的“史诗三部曲中的第三部”，法院认定，原告个人和各州都没有资格质疑所谓的个人授权的合宪性。2

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Episode III: California v. Texas

Episode III:California v. Texas—On June 21, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court issued their long-awaited decision on California v. Texas, “the third installment in the epic trilogy” of cases challenging the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”).1 In a 7-to-2 decision authored by Justice Breyer, the Court found that both the individual plaintiffs and the states lacked standing to challenge the constitutionality of the so-called individual mandate.2

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

American Journal of Law & Medicine LAW-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： desde Enero 2004 Último Numero: Octubre 2008 AJLM will solicit blind comments from expert peer reviewers, including faculty members of our editorial board, as well as from other preeminent health law and public policy academics and professionals from across the country and around the world.