PISA 2018高绩效国家学生信息通信技术使用情况简介

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mee-Reem Kim, Hyesook Kim
{"title":"PISA 2018高绩效国家学生信息通信技术使用情况简介","authors":"Mee-Reem Kim, Hyesook Kim","doi":"10.1080/07380569.2023.2180338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aims to identify the profiles regarding students’ familiarity with information and communication technology (ICT) and their relationships to reading literacy and background variables for high-performing countries in PISA 2018. We distinguished four classes in each of the six countries (Estonia, Hong Kong, Ireland, New Zealand, Poland, and Sweden), three classes in Finland and Korea, two classes in Macao, and five classes in Singapore. In most countries, the class with the highest perceived autonomy related to ICT use and low use of ICT at school showed the highest reading literacy. In contrast, the class with the highest overall ICT familiarity had the lowest reading literacy. Classes with a high ICT familiarity tended to have a higher proportion of male students. Finally, the SES of the class with the lowest ICT familiarity was significantly lower than that of other classes.","PeriodicalId":45769,"journal":{"name":"COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profiles of Students’ ICT Use in High-Performing Countries in PISA 2018\",\"authors\":\"Mee-Reem Kim, Hyesook Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07380569.2023.2180338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study aims to identify the profiles regarding students’ familiarity with information and communication technology (ICT) and their relationships to reading literacy and background variables for high-performing countries in PISA 2018. We distinguished four classes in each of the six countries (Estonia, Hong Kong, Ireland, New Zealand, Poland, and Sweden), three classes in Finland and Korea, two classes in Macao, and five classes in Singapore. In most countries, the class with the highest perceived autonomy related to ICT use and low use of ICT at school showed the highest reading literacy. In contrast, the class with the highest overall ICT familiarity had the lowest reading literacy. Classes with a high ICT familiarity tended to have a higher proportion of male students. Finally, the SES of the class with the lowest ICT familiarity was significantly lower than that of other classes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2023.2180338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2023.2180338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究旨在确定PISA 2018中高绩效国家学生对信息和通信技术(ICT)的熟悉程度及其与阅读素养和背景变量的关系。我们在六国(爱沙尼亚、香港、爱尔兰、新西兰、波兰和瑞典)各有四个班,在芬兰和韩国有三个班,澳门有两个班,新加坡有五个班。在大多数国家,在使用信息和通信技术方面拥有最高自主权的班级和在学校使用信息和通讯技术较少的班级的阅读能力最高。相比之下,对信息通信技术总体熟悉程度最高的班级的阅读能力最低。熟悉信息和通信技术程度高的班级男生比例往往更高。最后,ICT熟悉程度最低的班级的SES显著低于其他班级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Profiles of Students’ ICT Use in High-Performing Countries in PISA 2018
Abstract This study aims to identify the profiles regarding students’ familiarity with information and communication technology (ICT) and their relationships to reading literacy and background variables for high-performing countries in PISA 2018. We distinguished four classes in each of the six countries (Estonia, Hong Kong, Ireland, New Zealand, Poland, and Sweden), three classes in Finland and Korea, two classes in Macao, and five classes in Singapore. In most countries, the class with the highest perceived autonomy related to ICT use and low use of ICT at school showed the highest reading literacy. In contrast, the class with the highest overall ICT familiarity had the lowest reading literacy. Classes with a high ICT familiarity tended to have a higher proportion of male students. Finally, the SES of the class with the lowest ICT familiarity was significantly lower than that of other classes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS
COMPUTERS IN THE SCHOOLS EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Under the editorship of D. LaMont Johnson, PhD, a nationally recognized leader in the field of educational computing, Computers in the Schools is supported by an editorial review board of prominent specialists in the school and educational setting. Material presented in this highly acclaimed journal goes beyond the “how we did it” magazine article or handbook by offering a rich source of serious discussion for educators, administrators, computer center directors, and special service providers in the school setting. Articles emphasize the practical aspect of any application, but also tie theory to practice, relate present accomplishments to past efforts and future trends, identify conclusions and their implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信