触摸哲学:从亚里士多德到现象学

IF 0.5 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY Pub Date : 2020-10-14 DOI:10.1163/15691640-12341453

R. Kearney

{"title":"触摸哲学:从亚里士多德到现象学","authors":"R. Kearney","doi":"10.1163/15691640-12341453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis essay explores Aristotle’s discovery of touch as the most universal and philosophical of the senses. It analyses his central insight in the De Anima that tactile flesh is a “medium not an organ,” unpacking both its metaphysical and ethical implications. The essay concludes with a discussion of how contemporary phenomenology—from Husserl to Merleau-Ponty and Irigaray—re-describes Aristotle’s seminal intuition regarding the model of “double reversible sensation.”","PeriodicalId":44158,"journal":{"name":"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY","volume":"50 1","pages":"300-316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Philosophies of Touch: from Aristotle to Phenomenology\",\"authors\":\"R. Kearney\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15691640-12341453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis essay explores Aristotle’s discovery of touch as the most universal and philosophical of the senses. It analyses his central insight in the De Anima that tactile flesh is a “medium not an organ,” unpacking both its metaphysical and ethical implications. The essay concludes with a discussion of how contemporary phenomenology—from Husserl to Merleau-Ponty and Irigaray—re-describes Aristotle’s seminal intuition regarding the model of “double reversible sensation.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":44158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"300-316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341453\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341453","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章探讨了亚里士多德发现触觉是最普遍和最具哲学意义的感官。它分析了他在《动物》中的核心见解，即触觉肉是一种“媒介而非器官”，揭示了其形而上学和伦理含义。文章最后讨论了当代现象学——从胡塞尔到梅洛-庞蒂和伊里加雷——如何重新描述亚里士多德关于“双重可逆感觉”模型的开创性直觉

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Philosophies of Touch: from Aristotle to Phenomenology

This essay explores Aristotle’s discovery of touch as the most universal and philosophical of the senses. It analyses his central insight in the De Anima that tactile flesh is a “medium not an organ,” unpacking both its metaphysical and ethical implications. The essay concludes with a discussion of how contemporary phenomenology—from Husserl to Merleau-Ponty and Irigaray—re-describes Aristotle’s seminal intuition regarding the model of “double reversible sensation.”

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Research in Phenomenology deals with phenomenological philosophy in a broad sense, including original phenomenological research, critical and interpretative studies of major phenomenological thinkers, studies relating phenomenological philosophy to other disciplines, and historical studies of special relevance to phenomenological philosophy.