单一制威权国家的地方治理多样性:广州和杭州的非政府组织-国家关系

IF 2.4 2区社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES

Journal of Contemporary China Pub Date : 2022-08-10 DOI:10.1080/10670564.2022.2109843

Oscar Almén, G. Sundqvist

{"title":"单一制威权国家的地方治理多样性:广州和杭州的非政府组织-国家关系","authors":"Oscar Almén, G. Sundqvist","doi":"10.1080/10670564.2022.2109843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigates how the different political opportunity structures (POS) are related to NGO mobilization in two Chinese cities, Guangzhou and Hangzhou. Based on 48 interviews from 2016–2019, the study finds that variance in NGO mobilization is related to differences such as rules for NGO registration, more or less open-minded local leaders, and a relatively more independent media. NGO governance in Hangzhou is characterized as coopted participation. A few NGOs are allowed some influence in policy making, but in order to be allowed to mobilize, NGOs must accept a certain degree of cooptation. NGO governance in Guangzhou is characterized as constrained autonomy as the government plays a less active role in mobilizing NGOs, and more initiative for policy influence comes from the NGOs themselves.","PeriodicalId":47894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary China","volume":"32 1","pages":"669 - 685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local Governance Diversity in the Unitary Authoritarian State: NGO-State Relations in Guangzhou and Hangzhou\",\"authors\":\"Oscar Almén, G. Sundqvist\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10670564.2022.2109843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study investigates how the different political opportunity structures (POS) are related to NGO mobilization in two Chinese cities, Guangzhou and Hangzhou. Based on 48 interviews from 2016–2019, the study finds that variance in NGO mobilization is related to differences such as rules for NGO registration, more or less open-minded local leaders, and a relatively more independent media. NGO governance in Hangzhou is characterized as coopted participation. A few NGOs are allowed some influence in policy making, but in order to be allowed to mobilize, NGOs must accept a certain degree of cooptation. NGO governance in Guangzhou is characterized as constrained autonomy as the government plays a less active role in mobilizing NGOs, and more initiative for policy influence comes from the NGOs themselves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary China\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"669 - 685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary China\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2022.2109843\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary China","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2022.2109843","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究调查了广州和杭州两个城市不同的政治机会结构与非政府组织动员的关系。基于2016年至2019年的48次采访，该研究发现，非政府组织动员的差异与非政府组织注册规则、或多或少开明的地方领导人和相对更独立的媒体等差异有关。杭州的非政府组织治理具有合作参与的特征。少数非政府组织被允许在政策制定中发挥一定的影响力，但为了被允许动员，非政府组织必须接受一定程度的合作。广州的非政府组织治理具有自治受限的特点，政府在动员非政府组织方面的积极性较低，政策影响的主动性更多来自非政府组织自身。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Local Governance Diversity in the Unitary Authoritarian State: NGO-State Relations in Guangzhou and Hangzhou

ABSTRACT This study investigates how the different political opportunity structures (POS) are related to NGO mobilization in two Chinese cities, Guangzhou and Hangzhou. Based on 48 interviews from 2016–2019, the study finds that variance in NGO mobilization is related to differences such as rules for NGO registration, more or less open-minded local leaders, and a relatively more independent media. NGO governance in Hangzhou is characterized as coopted participation. A few NGOs are allowed some influence in policy making, but in order to be allowed to mobilize, NGOs must accept a certain degree of cooptation. NGO governance in Guangzhou is characterized as constrained autonomy as the government plays a less active role in mobilizing NGOs, and more initiative for policy influence comes from the NGOs themselves.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Contemporary China AREA STUDIES-

CiteScore

5.10

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of Contemporary China is the only English language journal edited in North America that provides exclusive information about contemporary Chinese affairs for scholars, businessmen and government policy-makers. It publishes articles of theoretical and policy research and research notes, as well as book reviews. The journal"s fields of interest include economics, political science, law, culture, literature, business, history, international relations, sociology and other social sciences and humanities.