二语学习双元在线互动中的排除和放弃语言修复

Q4 Social Sciences
William L. Owens
{"title":"二语学习双元在线互动中的排除和放弃语言修复","authors":"William L. Owens","doi":"10.15858/engtea.77.1.202203.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This investigation uses conversation analysis (CA) to document, in very close detail, how participants-in-interaction manage and organize repair practices in moments when linguistic repair becomes conditionally relevant in conversational or ‘chatting’ phases of online dyadic L2-learning interactions between a tutor and tutee Specifically, this study focuses on the phenomena of precluding linguistic repair when it becomes relevant (by making it conditional on quick uptake and completion, and by deploying turn-taking devices to hold the turn when other-correction becomes or seems relevant) and abandoning it when it is in progress. Analysis framed these phenomena not as individual strategies, but as collaborative accomplishments realized through the interactional competence (IC) of the participants, and showed that participants oriented to both pedagogical and social concerns in moments of linguistic repair. Therefore, such moments were key sites for co-construction and configuration of the interactional space as primarily social or pedagogical, or as a complex and conditional interweaving of the two.","PeriodicalId":36188,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching(South Korea)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Precluding and Abandoning Linguistic Repair in Dyadic Online Interactions for L2 Learning\",\"authors\":\"William L. Owens\",\"doi\":\"10.15858/engtea.77.1.202203.93\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This investigation uses conversation analysis (CA) to document, in very close detail, how participants-in-interaction manage and organize repair practices in moments when linguistic repair becomes conditionally relevant in conversational or ‘chatting’ phases of online dyadic L2-learning interactions between a tutor and tutee Specifically, this study focuses on the phenomena of precluding linguistic repair when it becomes relevant (by making it conditional on quick uptake and completion, and by deploying turn-taking devices to hold the turn when other-correction becomes or seems relevant) and abandoning it when it is in progress. Analysis framed these phenomena not as individual strategies, but as collaborative accomplishments realized through the interactional competence (IC) of the participants, and showed that participants oriented to both pedagogical and social concerns in moments of linguistic repair. Therefore, such moments were key sites for co-construction and configuration of the interactional space as primarily social or pedagogical, or as a complex and conditional interweaving of the two.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English Teaching(South Korea)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English Teaching(South Korea)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.77.1.202203.93\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching(South Korea)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.77.1.202203.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究使用会话分析(CA)来非常详细地记录互动参与者如何在导师和被导师之间的在线二元二语学习互动的会话或“聊天”阶段,当语言修复变得有条件相关时,管理和组织修复实践,这项研究的重点是当语言修复变得相关时(通过使其以快速理解和完成为条件,以及当其他纠正变得或看起来相关时,通过部署转向装置来保持转向)排除语言修复,并在进行中放弃语言修复的现象。分析认为,这些现象不是个人策略,而是通过参与者的互动能力(IC)实现的合作成就,并表明参与者在语言修复的时刻既关注教学问题,也关注社会问题。因此,这些时刻是共同构建和配置互动空间的关键场所,互动空间主要是社会或教学空间,或者是两者复杂而有条件的交织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Precluding and Abandoning Linguistic Repair in Dyadic Online Interactions for L2 Learning
This investigation uses conversation analysis (CA) to document, in very close detail, how participants-in-interaction manage and organize repair practices in moments when linguistic repair becomes conditionally relevant in conversational or ‘chatting’ phases of online dyadic L2-learning interactions between a tutor and tutee Specifically, this study focuses on the phenomena of precluding linguistic repair when it becomes relevant (by making it conditional on quick uptake and completion, and by deploying turn-taking devices to hold the turn when other-correction becomes or seems relevant) and abandoning it when it is in progress. Analysis framed these phenomena not as individual strategies, but as collaborative accomplishments realized through the interactional competence (IC) of the participants, and showed that participants oriented to both pedagogical and social concerns in moments of linguistic repair. Therefore, such moments were key sites for co-construction and configuration of the interactional space as primarily social or pedagogical, or as a complex and conditional interweaving of the two.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
English Teaching(South Korea)
English Teaching(South Korea) Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信