教师对循证实践和教育研究结果评价的预测因素

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Eva Thomm, Christine Sälzer, Manfred Prenzel, Johannes Bauer
{"title":"教师对循证实践和教育研究结果评价的预测因素","authors":"Eva Thomm, Christine Sälzer, Manfred Prenzel, Johannes Bauer","doi":"10.1024/1010-0652/A000301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Teachers' reception of educational research is considered important for improving teaching and student learning. Yet, it is a challenging task requiring teachers to have access to scientific sources, the skill and time to find and exhaust such resources, and the capacity to interpret retrieved information. If such essential conditions are not met, teachers have hardly any chance to engage in research reception and, consequently, may question the value and relevance of research findings to their practice. Prior research has suggested that teachers are indeed critical of educational research findings and rarely refer to them. Based on data from the field trial ( N = 674) and main study ( N = 2,549) of a national extension study of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012 in Germany, this study explored the role of (a) teachers' access to scientific sources, (b) perceived lack of skill and time to search for research findings, and (c) their familiarity with research methods/statistics as potential predictors of their appreciation of evidence-based practice, and perceived irrelevance of educational research findings. Structural equation models demonstrated that perceived lack of skill and time to find research findings, in particular, substantially affected participants' irrelevance perceptions. The more participants assessed their sourcing skill and time to be too constrained to engage in research reception, the more they judged research findings to be irrelevant to their practice. Though source access and familiarity with research methods/statistics indicated only small or even no effects, they strongly correlated with participants' perceived lack of sourcing skill and time. Better source access and greater familiarity were associated with less concern about one's skill and time resources to search for relevant research findings. These findings potentially underline the relevance of strengthening both teachers' access to scientific sources and individual capacities to understanding research contents.","PeriodicalId":51755,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Padagogische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of teachers' appreciation of evidence-based practice and educational research findings\",\"authors\":\"Eva Thomm, Christine Sälzer, Manfred Prenzel, Johannes Bauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/1010-0652/A000301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Teachers' reception of educational research is considered important for improving teaching and student learning. Yet, it is a challenging task requiring teachers to have access to scientific sources, the skill and time to find and exhaust such resources, and the capacity to interpret retrieved information. If such essential conditions are not met, teachers have hardly any chance to engage in research reception and, consequently, may question the value and relevance of research findings to their practice. Prior research has suggested that teachers are indeed critical of educational research findings and rarely refer to them. Based on data from the field trial ( N = 674) and main study ( N = 2,549) of a national extension study of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012 in Germany, this study explored the role of (a) teachers' access to scientific sources, (b) perceived lack of skill and time to search for research findings, and (c) their familiarity with research methods/statistics as potential predictors of their appreciation of evidence-based practice, and perceived irrelevance of educational research findings. Structural equation models demonstrated that perceived lack of skill and time to find research findings, in particular, substantially affected participants' irrelevance perceptions. The more participants assessed their sourcing skill and time to be too constrained to engage in research reception, the more they judged research findings to be irrelevant to their practice. Though source access and familiarity with research methods/statistics indicated only small or even no effects, they strongly correlated with participants' perceived lack of sourcing skill and time. Better source access and greater familiarity were associated with less concern about one's skill and time resources to search for relevant research findings. These findings potentially underline the relevance of strengthening both teachers' access to scientific sources and individual capacities to understanding research contents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Padagogische Psychologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Padagogische Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/A000301\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Padagogische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/A000301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

摘要教师接受教育研究被认为是改善教学和学生学习的重要因素。然而,这是一项具有挑战性的任务,要求教师能够获得科学资源,有技能和时间来发现和耗尽这些资源,并有能力解释检索到的信息。如果不满足这些基本条件,教师几乎没有机会接受研究,因此可能会质疑研究结果对其实践的价值和相关性。先前的研究表明,教师确实对教育研究结果持批评态度,很少提及这些研究结果。根据德国2012年国际学生评估计划(PISA)的一项全国推广研究的实地试验(N=674)和主要研究(N=2549)的数据,本研究探讨了以下因素的作用:(a)教师获得科学资源的机会,以及(c)他们对研究方法/统计学的熟悉程度是他们对循证实践的赞赏的潜在预测因素,以及他们认为教育研究结果无关紧要。结构方程模型表明,尤其是缺乏发现研究结果的技能和时间,严重影响了参与者的无关感知。参与者越是评估他们的采购技能和时间过于受限,无法参与研究接收,他们就越是认为研究结果与他们的实践无关。尽管来源的获取和对研究方法/统计数据的熟悉程度表明影响很小,甚至没有,但它们与参与者感知的缺乏来源技能和时间密切相关。更好的资源获取和更熟悉与较少关注自己搜索相关研究结果的技能和时间资源有关。这些发现可能强调了加强教师获取科学资源的机会和个人理解研究内容的能力的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of teachers' appreciation of evidence-based practice and educational research findings
Abstract. Teachers' reception of educational research is considered important for improving teaching and student learning. Yet, it is a challenging task requiring teachers to have access to scientific sources, the skill and time to find and exhaust such resources, and the capacity to interpret retrieved information. If such essential conditions are not met, teachers have hardly any chance to engage in research reception and, consequently, may question the value and relevance of research findings to their practice. Prior research has suggested that teachers are indeed critical of educational research findings and rarely refer to them. Based on data from the field trial ( N = 674) and main study ( N = 2,549) of a national extension study of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012 in Germany, this study explored the role of (a) teachers' access to scientific sources, (b) perceived lack of skill and time to search for research findings, and (c) their familiarity with research methods/statistics as potential predictors of their appreciation of evidence-based practice, and perceived irrelevance of educational research findings. Structural equation models demonstrated that perceived lack of skill and time to find research findings, in particular, substantially affected participants' irrelevance perceptions. The more participants assessed their sourcing skill and time to be too constrained to engage in research reception, the more they judged research findings to be irrelevant to their practice. Though source access and familiarity with research methods/statistics indicated only small or even no effects, they strongly correlated with participants' perceived lack of sourcing skill and time. Better source access and greater familiarity were associated with less concern about one's skill and time resources to search for relevant research findings. These findings potentially underline the relevance of strengthening both teachers' access to scientific sources and individual capacities to understanding research contents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift Fur Padagogische Psychologie
Zeitschrift Fur Padagogische Psychologie PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift publiziert Beiträge aus dem Gesamtgebiet der Pädagogischen Psychologie. Alle eingereichten Beiträge werden einem anonymen Begutachtungsverfahren unterzogen ("blind peer-review").
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信