师范院校的专业是否会影响学生在科学领域的学业成绩?具有师生固定效应的跨子领域分析

IF 1.2 Q3 Social Sciences
A. Inoue, Ryuichi Tanaka
{"title":"师范院校的专业是否会影响学生在科学领域的学业成绩?具有师生固定效应的跨子领域分析","authors":"A. Inoue, Ryuichi Tanaka","doi":"10.1080/09645292.2022.2119549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We examine whether and how teachers’ major fields in college affect students’ achievement, exploiting within-student variation across subfields in natural science (i.e. physics, chemistry, biology, and Earth science). Using middle-school students’ data from the TIMSS and controlling for student-teacher fixed effects, we find that teachers improve students’ achievement in subfields of natural sciences correspond to their college majors. Teaching practices explain about half of the effect, mostly accounted for by teachers’ preparation for teaching science topics. The results are robust to potential endogenous matching between students and teachers.","PeriodicalId":46682,"journal":{"name":"Education Economics","volume":"31 1","pages":"617 - 631"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do teachers’ college majors affect students’ academic achievement in the sciences? A cross-subfields analysis with student-teacher fixed effects\",\"authors\":\"A. Inoue, Ryuichi Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09645292.2022.2119549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We examine whether and how teachers’ major fields in college affect students’ achievement, exploiting within-student variation across subfields in natural science (i.e. physics, chemistry, biology, and Earth science). Using middle-school students’ data from the TIMSS and controlling for student-teacher fixed effects, we find that teachers improve students’ achievement in subfields of natural sciences correspond to their college majors. Teaching practices explain about half of the effect, mostly accounted for by teachers’ preparation for teaching science topics. The results are robust to potential endogenous matching between students and teachers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Economics\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"617 - 631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2022.2119549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2022.2119549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:我们研究了教师在大学的主要领域是否以及如何影响学生的成绩,利用自然科学(即物理、化学、生物和地球科学)各子领域的学生内部差异。利用来自TIMSS的中学生数据,并控制师生固定效应,我们发现教师在与大学专业相对应的自然科学子领域提高了学生的成绩。教学实践解释了大约一半的效果,主要是由于教师对科学主题教学的准备。研究结果对学生和教师之间潜在的内生匹配具有稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do teachers’ college majors affect students’ academic achievement in the sciences? A cross-subfields analysis with student-teacher fixed effects
ABSTRACT We examine whether and how teachers’ major fields in college affect students’ achievement, exploiting within-student variation across subfields in natural science (i.e. physics, chemistry, biology, and Earth science). Using middle-school students’ data from the TIMSS and controlling for student-teacher fixed effects, we find that teachers improve students’ achievement in subfields of natural sciences correspond to their college majors. Teaching practices explain about half of the effect, mostly accounted for by teachers’ preparation for teaching science topics. The results are robust to potential endogenous matching between students and teachers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education Economics
Education Economics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Education Economics is a peer-reviewed journal serving as a forum for debate in all areas of the economics and management of education. Particular emphasis is given to the "quantitative" aspects of educational management which involve numerate disciplines such as economics and operational research. The content is of international appeal and is not limited to material of a technical nature. Applied work with clear policy implications is especially encouraged. Readership of the journal includes academics in the field of education, economics and management; civil servants and local government officials responsible for education and manpower planning; educational managers at the level of the individual school or college.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信