一段时间内的民意建模:潜在趋势模型的模拟研究

IF 1.6 4区 数学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS
M. Kołczyńska, P. Bürkner
{"title":"一段时间内的民意建模:潜在趋势模型的模拟研究","authors":"M. Kołczyńska, P. Bürkner","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/gauvx","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analyzing trends in public opinion is important for monitoring social change and for testing theories aimed at explaining this change. With growing availability of multi-wave surveys, social scientists are increasingly turning to latent trend models applied to survey data for examining changes in social and political attitudes. With the aim of facilitating this research, our study compares different approaches to modeling latent trends of aggregate public opinion: splines, Gaussian processes, and discrete autoregressive models. We examine the ability of these models to recover latent trends with simulated data that vary with regard to the frequency and magnitude of changes in the true trend, model complexity and data availability. Overall, we find that all three latent trend models perform well in all scenarios, even the most difficult ones with frequent and weak changes of the latent trend and sparse data. The two main performance differences we find include the relatively higher squared errors of autoregressive models compared to the other models, and the under-coverage of posterior intervals in high-frequency low-amplitude trends with splines. For all models and across all scenarios performance improves with increased data availability, which emphasizes the need of supplying sufficient data for accurate estimation of latent trends.","PeriodicalId":17146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling public opinion over time: A simulation study of latent trend models\",\"authors\":\"M. Kołczyńska, P. Bürkner\",\"doi\":\"10.31235/osf.io/gauvx\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Analyzing trends in public opinion is important for monitoring social change and for testing theories aimed at explaining this change. With growing availability of multi-wave surveys, social scientists are increasingly turning to latent trend models applied to survey data for examining changes in social and political attitudes. With the aim of facilitating this research, our study compares different approaches to modeling latent trends of aggregate public opinion: splines, Gaussian processes, and discrete autoregressive models. We examine the ability of these models to recover latent trends with simulated data that vary with regard to the frequency and magnitude of changes in the true trend, model complexity and data availability. Overall, we find that all three latent trend models perform well in all scenarios, even the most difficult ones with frequent and weak changes of the latent trend and sparse data. The two main performance differences we find include the relatively higher squared errors of autoregressive models compared to the other models, and the under-coverage of posterior intervals in high-frequency low-amplitude trends with splines. For all models and across all scenarios performance improves with increased data availability, which emphasizes the need of supplying sufficient data for accurate estimation of latent trends.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/gauvx\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/gauvx","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

分析公众舆论的趋势对于监测社会变化和检验旨在解释这种变化的理论非常重要。随着多波调查的日益普及,社会科学家越来越多地转向应用于调查数据的潜在趋势模型,以研究社会和政治态度的变化。为了促进这项研究,我们的研究比较了建模总体民意潜在趋势的不同方法:样条曲线、高斯过程和离散自回归模型。我们研究了这些模型利用模拟数据恢复潜在趋势的能力,模拟数据随着真实趋势、模型复杂性和数据可用性的变化频率和幅度而变化。总体而言,我们发现所有三个潜在趋势模型在所有情况下都表现良好,即使是最困难的潜在趋势变化频繁和微弱且数据稀疏的模型。我们发现的两个主要性能差异包括与其他模型相比,自回归模型的平方误差相对较高,以及在具有样条的高频低振幅趋势中后验区间覆盖不足。对于所有模型和所有场景,性能随着数据可用性的增加而提高,这强调了提供足够数据以准确估计潜在趋势的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling public opinion over time: A simulation study of latent trend models
Analyzing trends in public opinion is important for monitoring social change and for testing theories aimed at explaining this change. With growing availability of multi-wave surveys, social scientists are increasingly turning to latent trend models applied to survey data for examining changes in social and political attitudes. With the aim of facilitating this research, our study compares different approaches to modeling latent trends of aggregate public opinion: splines, Gaussian processes, and discrete autoregressive models. We examine the ability of these models to recover latent trends with simulated data that vary with regard to the frequency and magnitude of changes in the true trend, model complexity and data availability. Overall, we find that all three latent trend models perform well in all scenarios, even the most difficult ones with frequent and weak changes of the latent trend and sparse data. The two main performance differences we find include the relatively higher squared errors of autoregressive models compared to the other models, and the under-coverage of posterior intervals in high-frequency low-amplitude trends with splines. For all models and across all scenarios performance improves with increased data availability, which emphasizes the need of supplying sufficient data for accurate estimation of latent trends.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, sponsored by AAPOR and the American Statistical Association, began publishing in 2013. Its objective is to publish cutting edge scholarly articles on statistical and methodological issues for sample surveys, censuses, administrative record systems, and other related data. It aims to be the flagship journal for research on survey statistics and methodology. Topics of interest include survey sample design, statistical inference, nonresponse, measurement error, the effects of modes of data collection, paradata and responsive survey design, combining data from multiple sources, record linkage, disclosure limitation, and other issues in survey statistics and methodology. The journal publishes both theoretical and applied papers, provided the theory is motivated by an important applied problem and the applied papers report on research that contributes generalizable knowledge to the field. Review papers are also welcomed. Papers on a broad range of surveys are encouraged, including (but not limited to) surveys concerning business, economics, marketing research, social science, environment, epidemiology, biostatistics and official statistics. The journal has three sections. The Survey Statistics section presents papers on innovative sampling procedures, imputation, weighting, measures of uncertainty, small area inference, new methods of analysis, and other statistical issues related to surveys. The Survey Methodology section presents papers that focus on methodological research, including methodological experiments, methods of data collection and use of paradata. The Applications section contains papers involving innovative applications of methods and providing practical contributions and guidance, and/or significant new findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信