向墨西哥营养和饮食专业人员举办的虚拟营养护理过程研讨会的学习成果

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
K. Heitman, G. Proaño, C. Papoutsakis, Paula Diaque Ballesteros, A. Steiber, C. Taylor
{"title":"向墨西哥营养和饮食专业人员举办的虚拟营养护理过程研讨会的学习成果","authors":"K. Heitman, G. Proaño, C. Papoutsakis, Paula Diaque Ballesteros, A. Steiber, C. Taylor","doi":"10.1097/TIN.0000000000000292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A virtual Nutrition Care Process (NCP) workshop was delivered to 11 nutrition professionals in Mexico. Knowledge was evaluated with an NCP pre-/posttest, focus groups were conducted to gain deeper understanding of the workshop experience, and patient notes (n = 79) were assessed for quality as a measure of NCP implementation. Mean knowledge scores increased after the workshop from 73.5% to 83.6% (P = .003). The focus group elucidated facilitators/barriers of NCP resources. Most patient notes were graded “low quality.” Although the online delivery was a viable method to provide NCP education to a global audience, application of knowledge was not demonstrated, indicating the need for follow-up support.","PeriodicalId":48681,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Clinical Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Outcomes From a Virtual Nutrition Care Process Workshop Delivered to Nutrition and Dietetics Professionals in Mexico\",\"authors\":\"K. Heitman, G. Proaño, C. Papoutsakis, Paula Diaque Ballesteros, A. Steiber, C. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TIN.0000000000000292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A virtual Nutrition Care Process (NCP) workshop was delivered to 11 nutrition professionals in Mexico. Knowledge was evaluated with an NCP pre-/posttest, focus groups were conducted to gain deeper understanding of the workshop experience, and patient notes (n = 79) were assessed for quality as a measure of NCP implementation. Mean knowledge scores increased after the workshop from 73.5% to 83.6% (P = .003). The focus group elucidated facilitators/barriers of NCP resources. Most patient notes were graded “low quality.” Although the online delivery was a viable method to provide NCP education to a global audience, application of knowledge was not demonstrated, indicating the need for follow-up support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Clinical Nutrition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Clinical Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TIN.0000000000000292\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TIN.0000000000000292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为墨西哥的11名营养专业人员举办了一场虚拟营养护理过程研讨会。通过NCP前/后测试评估知识,进行焦点小组以更深入地了解研讨会经验,并评估患者笔记(n=79)的质量,作为NCP实施的衡量标准。研讨会结束后,平均知识得分从73.5%提高到83.6%(P=0.003)。焦点小组阐明了NCP资源的促进者/障碍。大多数患者笔记被评为“低质量”。尽管在线交付是向全球受众提供新冠肺炎教育的可行方法,但知识的应用并未得到证明,这表明需要后续支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning Outcomes From a Virtual Nutrition Care Process Workshop Delivered to Nutrition and Dietetics Professionals in Mexico
A virtual Nutrition Care Process (NCP) workshop was delivered to 11 nutrition professionals in Mexico. Knowledge was evaluated with an NCP pre-/posttest, focus groups were conducted to gain deeper understanding of the workshop experience, and patient notes (n = 79) were assessed for quality as a measure of NCP implementation. Mean knowledge scores increased after the workshop from 73.5% to 83.6% (P = .003). The focus group elucidated facilitators/barriers of NCP resources. Most patient notes were graded “low quality.” Although the online delivery was a viable method to provide NCP education to a global audience, application of knowledge was not demonstrated, indicating the need for follow-up support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in Clinical Nutrition
Topics in Clinical Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: ​​Topics in Clinical Nutrition (TICN) is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal designed as a resource for the continuing education and clinical practice of dietitians and nutritionists. Each issue addresses topics of interest primarily to dietitians and nutritionists, students and interns in professional training programs and other health care personnel involved in the nutritional care of patients. Articles include translational research reports (work that applies new knowledge to practical effect), practice projects, evidence-based literature reviews, case studies and book reviews, and articles that highlight education theory and applied research which share the tools and techniques of nutrition and dietetics education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信