Shakti Singh, A. Dzeranov, L. Bondarenko, K. Kydralieva, G. Dzhardimalieva, A. Babaytsev, G. Kugabaeva, N. Golubeva, B. Yadav
{"title":"用于高响应LPG传感的改性Fe3O4磁铁矿Core@Shell型纳米材料的比较分析","authors":"Shakti Singh, A. Dzeranov, L. Bondarenko, K. Kydralieva, G. Dzhardimalieva, A. Babaytsev, G. Kugabaeva, N. Golubeva, B. Yadav","doi":"10.1149/2754-2726/acc3ab","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work focuses on the synthesis of Fe3O4 magnetite core@shell type nanoparticles modified with three types of ligands: Magnetite with activated carbon (MAC), Magnetite with silica (tetraethoxysilane, TEOS, and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, APTES) (MTA) and Magnetite with silica, APTES and humic acids (MTAH). The MTAH sample shows greater porosity in comparison to MTA, and MAC samples. The band gap of MTAH is 4.08 eV, which is higher than MTA (2.92 eV), and MAC (2.80 eV). Rietveld quantitative phase analysis of all derivatives was performed and compared with all three samples. The LPG sensing at room temperature shows the highest sensor response of 9.42, in comparison to 3.87 sensor response for MAC, and 4.60 for MTA. This approximately double sensor response increment is justified with the help of band gap, porosity, and size of all 3 the samples. The MTAH sample shows the lowest response-recovery time of 9.33 and 10.78 s respectively in comparison to MAC and MTA samples. In conclusion, this manuscript describes the synthesis procedure of different derivatives of Fe3O4 core@shell materials along with the relation of LPG sensing with different parameters of the materials.","PeriodicalId":72870,"journal":{"name":"ECS sensors plus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified Fe3O4 Magnetite Core@Shell Type Nanomaterials for Highly-Responsive LPG Sensing: A Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Shakti Singh, A. Dzeranov, L. Bondarenko, K. Kydralieva, G. Dzhardimalieva, A. Babaytsev, G. Kugabaeva, N. Golubeva, B. Yadav\",\"doi\":\"10.1149/2754-2726/acc3ab\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present work focuses on the synthesis of Fe3O4 magnetite core@shell type nanoparticles modified with three types of ligands: Magnetite with activated carbon (MAC), Magnetite with silica (tetraethoxysilane, TEOS, and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, APTES) (MTA) and Magnetite with silica, APTES and humic acids (MTAH). The MTAH sample shows greater porosity in comparison to MTA, and MAC samples. The band gap of MTAH is 4.08 eV, which is higher than MTA (2.92 eV), and MAC (2.80 eV). Rietveld quantitative phase analysis of all derivatives was performed and compared with all three samples. The LPG sensing at room temperature shows the highest sensor response of 9.42, in comparison to 3.87 sensor response for MAC, and 4.60 for MTA. This approximately double sensor response increment is justified with the help of band gap, porosity, and size of all 3 the samples. The MTAH sample shows the lowest response-recovery time of 9.33 and 10.78 s respectively in comparison to MAC and MTA samples. In conclusion, this manuscript describes the synthesis procedure of different derivatives of Fe3O4 core@shell materials along with the relation of LPG sensing with different parameters of the materials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ECS sensors plus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ECS sensors plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1149/2754-2726/acc3ab\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECS sensors plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1149/2754-2726/acc3ab","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modified Fe3O4 Magnetite Core@Shell Type Nanomaterials for Highly-Responsive LPG Sensing: A Comparative Analysis
The present work focuses on the synthesis of Fe3O4 magnetite core@shell type nanoparticles modified with three types of ligands: Magnetite with activated carbon (MAC), Magnetite with silica (tetraethoxysilane, TEOS, and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, APTES) (MTA) and Magnetite with silica, APTES and humic acids (MTAH). The MTAH sample shows greater porosity in comparison to MTA, and MAC samples. The band gap of MTAH is 4.08 eV, which is higher than MTA (2.92 eV), and MAC (2.80 eV). Rietveld quantitative phase analysis of all derivatives was performed and compared with all three samples. The LPG sensing at room temperature shows the highest sensor response of 9.42, in comparison to 3.87 sensor response for MAC, and 4.60 for MTA. This approximately double sensor response increment is justified with the help of band gap, porosity, and size of all 3 the samples. The MTAH sample shows the lowest response-recovery time of 9.33 and 10.78 s respectively in comparison to MAC and MTA samples. In conclusion, this manuscript describes the synthesis procedure of different derivatives of Fe3O4 core@shell materials along with the relation of LPG sensing with different parameters of the materials.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
