参加国际协定的自由和履行国际义务的自由

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW

International Organizations Law Review Pub Date : 2021-05-20 DOI:10.1163/15723747-18010001

E. Tino

{"title":"参加国际协定的自由和履行国际义务的自由","authors":"E. Tino","doi":"10.1163/15723747-18010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn August 2019 South Africa withdrew its signature from the Protocol on sadc Tribunal signed in 2014 by 9 sadc Member States. This decision was adopted in compliance with the judgment of the South African High Court as confirmed by the Constitutional Court which ruled that the participation of the President in the decision to suspend the sadc Tribunal, as well as his signature of the 2014 Protocol were unconstitutional, unlawful and irrational. These rulings are particularly ground-breaking in light of the conclusions they reached and raised some interesting implications under international law.","PeriodicalId":42966,"journal":{"name":"International Organizations Law Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"105-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liberty of Entering in International Agreements and Compliance of International Obligations\",\"authors\":\"E. Tino\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15723747-18010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nIn August 2019 South Africa withdrew its signature from the Protocol on sadc Tribunal signed in 2014 by 9 sadc Member States. This decision was adopted in compliance with the judgment of the South African High Court as confirmed by the Constitutional Court which ruled that the participation of the President in the decision to suspend the sadc Tribunal, as well as his signature of the 2014 Protocol were unconstitutional, unlawful and irrational. These rulings are particularly ground-breaking in light of the conclusions they reached and raised some interesting implications under international law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Organizations Law Review\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"105-127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Organizations Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-18010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Organizations Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-18010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年8月，南非撤回了由9个南非国际法庭成员国于2014年签署的《南非国际法庭议定书》。这一决定是根据南非高等法院的判决通过的，宪法法院确认了这一判决，该判决裁定总统参与暂停sadc法庭的决定以及他签署2014年议定书是违宪、非法和不合理的。鉴于这些裁决得出的结论，这些裁决尤其具有开创性意义，并对国际法产生了一些有趣的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Liberty of Entering in International Agreements and Compliance of International Obligations

In August 2019 South Africa withdrew its signature from the Protocol on sadc Tribunal signed in 2014 by 9 sadc Member States. This decision was adopted in compliance with the judgment of the South African High Court as confirmed by the Constitutional Court which ruled that the participation of the President in the decision to suspend the sadc Tribunal, as well as his signature of the 2014 Protocol were unconstitutional, unlawful and irrational. These rulings are particularly ground-breaking in light of the conclusions they reached and raised some interesting implications under international law.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Organizations Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： After the Second World War in particular, the law of international organizations developed as a discipline within public international law. Separate, but not separable. The International Organizations Law Review purports to function as a discussion forum for academics and practitioners active in the field of the law of international organizations. It is based on two pillars; one is based in the world of scholarship, the other in the world of practice. In the first dimension, the Journal focuses on general developments in international institutional law.