在争议之地的自传

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE
Françoise Simonet-Tenant
{"title":"在争议之地的自传","authors":"Françoise Simonet-Tenant","doi":"10.12957/MATRAGA.2017.31607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article has Philippe Lejeune’s pathway as its point of departure, for having introduced the concept of the autobiographical pact in L’autobiographie en France (1971), his first book. It then visits his controversy with philosopher Georges Gusdorf, who criticized him for his rhetorical approach, his formalist and disembodied perspective of autobiographic writing. Finally, it renders the rise of autofiction by Serge Doubrovsky. Following, the article criticizes the polarization between both concepts, by demonstrating how reductionist it can be. The concept of autofiction is then explored in three main trends: the orthodox, which strictly follows Doubrovsky’s proposal; Jacques Lecarme’s, which expands it to encompass 20th-century authors previous to the term’s coinage; and Vicent Colonna’s heterodox trend, which applies it to any historical period whenever an author nominally inserts himself into his work. Besides, after comparing autofiction’s seductiveness to autobiography’s apparent ancientness, the text analyzes the concept of the autobiographical space, created by Lejeune. --- Original in French. --- DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/matraga.2017.31607","PeriodicalId":40929,"journal":{"name":"Matraga-Estudos Linguisticos e Literario","volume":"24 1","pages":"592-610"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.12957/MATRAGA.2017.31607","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L’autobiographie au pays de la polémique\",\"authors\":\"Françoise Simonet-Tenant\",\"doi\":\"10.12957/MATRAGA.2017.31607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article has Philippe Lejeune’s pathway as its point of departure, for having introduced the concept of the autobiographical pact in L’autobiographie en France (1971), his first book. It then visits his controversy with philosopher Georges Gusdorf, who criticized him for his rhetorical approach, his formalist and disembodied perspective of autobiographic writing. Finally, it renders the rise of autofiction by Serge Doubrovsky. Following, the article criticizes the polarization between both concepts, by demonstrating how reductionist it can be. The concept of autofiction is then explored in three main trends: the orthodox, which strictly follows Doubrovsky’s proposal; Jacques Lecarme’s, which expands it to encompass 20th-century authors previous to the term’s coinage; and Vicent Colonna’s heterodox trend, which applies it to any historical period whenever an author nominally inserts himself into his work. Besides, after comparing autofiction’s seductiveness to autobiography’s apparent ancientness, the text analyzes the concept of the autobiographical space, created by Lejeune. --- Original in French. --- DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/matraga.2017.31607\",\"PeriodicalId\":40929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Matraga-Estudos Linguisticos e Literario\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"592-610\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.12957/MATRAGA.2017.31607\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Matraga-Estudos Linguisticos e Literario\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12957/MATRAGA.2017.31607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Matraga-Estudos Linguisticos e Literario","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12957/MATRAGA.2017.31607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以菲利普·勒琼的路径为出发点,在他的第一本书《法国自传》(1971)中引入了自传契约的概念。然后,它访问了他与哲学家乔治·古斯多夫的争议,后者批评了他的修辞方法、他对自传写作的形式主义和无实体的视角。最后,它描绘了谢尔盖·杜布罗夫斯基的自动小说的兴起。接下来,文章通过论证自动小说的还原主义,对这两个概念之间的两极分化进行了批判。然后,自动小说的概念从三个主要趋势进行了探讨:正统派,严格遵循杜布罗夫斯基的建议;Jacques Lecarme的,将其扩展到20世纪该术语出现之前的作者;以及科隆纳牧师的异端倾向,每当作者名义上将自己插入作品中时,这种倾向就适用于任何历史时期。此外,在比较了自小说的诱惑性和自传的明显古老性之后,本文分析了勒琼所创造的自传空间的概念原件为法语。---DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/matraga.2017.31607
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
L’autobiographie au pays de la polémique
This article has Philippe Lejeune’s pathway as its point of departure, for having introduced the concept of the autobiographical pact in L’autobiographie en France (1971), his first book. It then visits his controversy with philosopher Georges Gusdorf, who criticized him for his rhetorical approach, his formalist and disembodied perspective of autobiographic writing. Finally, it renders the rise of autofiction by Serge Doubrovsky. Following, the article criticizes the polarization between both concepts, by demonstrating how reductionist it can be. The concept of autofiction is then explored in three main trends: the orthodox, which strictly follows Doubrovsky’s proposal; Jacques Lecarme’s, which expands it to encompass 20th-century authors previous to the term’s coinage; and Vicent Colonna’s heterodox trend, which applies it to any historical period whenever an author nominally inserts himself into his work. Besides, after comparing autofiction’s seductiveness to autobiography’s apparent ancientness, the text analyzes the concept of the autobiographical space, created by Lejeune. --- Original in French. --- DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/matraga.2017.31607
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信