爆炸载荷的非参数表征

IF 2.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Matthew R. Kirchner, Shawnasie R Kirchner, Adam A Dennis, S. Rigby
{"title":"爆炸载荷的非参数表征","authors":"Matthew R. Kirchner, Shawnasie R Kirchner, Adam A Dennis, S. Rigby","doi":"10.1177/20414196231184581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mathematical analysis of blast pressures has typically involved the empirical fitting of parametric models, which assumes a specific function shape. In reality, the true shape of the blast pressure is unknown and may lack a parametric form, particularly in the negative phase following arrival of the secondary shock. In this work, we develop a non-parametric (NP) representation that makes few assumptions and relies on the observed experimental data to fit a unique and previously unknown model. This differs from traditional approaches by not arbitrarily selecting a single, restrictive class of functions and estimating a minimal set of parameters, but rather estimating the underlying function class for which the blast pressure is generated; learning the model directly from the observed data. The method was applied to experimental blast measurements and the NP estimates matched the experimental data with a high degree of accuracy, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The NP approach was shown to significantly outperform other commonly used approaches, near-perfectly track the entire pressure and specific impulse history and predicting experimental peak specific impulse to within ±0.5% in all cases (compared to ±5.0% for a trained artificial neural network (ANN) and ±7.5% for the UFC semi-empirical approach). The NP approach predicts experimental net specific impulses (positive and negative phases combined) with a maximum variation of 2.7%, compared to maximum variations of −116% and 55% for the UFC and ANN approaches, respectively. Since the framework is probabilistic in nature, it can naturally account for random noise in sensor measurements, which are typically more pronounced in blast experiments than many other machine learning applications.","PeriodicalId":46272,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Protective Structures","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-parametric characterization of blast loads\",\"authors\":\"Matthew R. Kirchner, Shawnasie R Kirchner, Adam A Dennis, S. Rigby\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20414196231184581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mathematical analysis of blast pressures has typically involved the empirical fitting of parametric models, which assumes a specific function shape. In reality, the true shape of the blast pressure is unknown and may lack a parametric form, particularly in the negative phase following arrival of the secondary shock. In this work, we develop a non-parametric (NP) representation that makes few assumptions and relies on the observed experimental data to fit a unique and previously unknown model. This differs from traditional approaches by not arbitrarily selecting a single, restrictive class of functions and estimating a minimal set of parameters, but rather estimating the underlying function class for which the blast pressure is generated; learning the model directly from the observed data. The method was applied to experimental blast measurements and the NP estimates matched the experimental data with a high degree of accuracy, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The NP approach was shown to significantly outperform other commonly used approaches, near-perfectly track the entire pressure and specific impulse history and predicting experimental peak specific impulse to within ±0.5% in all cases (compared to ±5.0% for a trained artificial neural network (ANN) and ±7.5% for the UFC semi-empirical approach). The NP approach predicts experimental net specific impulses (positive and negative phases combined) with a maximum variation of 2.7%, compared to maximum variations of −116% and 55% for the UFC and ANN approaches, respectively. Since the framework is probabilistic in nature, it can naturally account for random noise in sensor measurements, which are typically more pronounced in blast experiments than many other machine learning applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Protective Structures\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Protective Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20414196231184581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Protective Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20414196231184581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

爆破压力的数学分析通常涉及参数模型的经验拟合,该模型假设特定的函数形状。事实上,爆破压力的真实形状是未知的,可能缺乏参数形式,特别是在二次冲击到达后的负阶段。在这项工作中,我们开发了一种非参数(NP)表示,该表示很少进行假设,并依赖于观察到的实验数据来拟合一个独特的和以前未知的模型。这与传统方法的不同之处在于,它不是任意选择一个单一的、限制性的函数类并估计一组最小的参数,而是估计产生爆破压力的基本函数类;直接从观测数据中学习模型。该方法被应用于实验爆破测量,NP估计值与实验数据在定性和定量方面都具有很高的准确性。NP方法显著优于其他常用方法,几乎完全跟踪整个压力和比冲历史,并在所有情况下预测实验峰值比冲在±0.5%以内(相比之下,训练的人工神经网络(ANN)为±5.0%,UFC半经验方法为±7.5%)。NP方法预测实验净特异性脉冲(正相位和负相位相结合)的最大变化为2.7%,而UFC和ANN方法的最大变化分别为-116%和55%。由于该框架本质上是概率性的,因此它可以自然地考虑传感器测量中的随机噪声,这在爆破实验中通常比许多其他机器学习应用更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-parametric characterization of blast loads
Mathematical analysis of blast pressures has typically involved the empirical fitting of parametric models, which assumes a specific function shape. In reality, the true shape of the blast pressure is unknown and may lack a parametric form, particularly in the negative phase following arrival of the secondary shock. In this work, we develop a non-parametric (NP) representation that makes few assumptions and relies on the observed experimental data to fit a unique and previously unknown model. This differs from traditional approaches by not arbitrarily selecting a single, restrictive class of functions and estimating a minimal set of parameters, but rather estimating the underlying function class for which the blast pressure is generated; learning the model directly from the observed data. The method was applied to experimental blast measurements and the NP estimates matched the experimental data with a high degree of accuracy, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The NP approach was shown to significantly outperform other commonly used approaches, near-perfectly track the entire pressure and specific impulse history and predicting experimental peak specific impulse to within ±0.5% in all cases (compared to ±5.0% for a trained artificial neural network (ANN) and ±7.5% for the UFC semi-empirical approach). The NP approach predicts experimental net specific impulses (positive and negative phases combined) with a maximum variation of 2.7%, compared to maximum variations of −116% and 55% for the UFC and ANN approaches, respectively. Since the framework is probabilistic in nature, it can naturally account for random noise in sensor measurements, which are typically more pronounced in blast experiments than many other machine learning applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信