设计伦理在维护学生隐私中的作用:对高等教育中学习设计师的行动呼吁

IF 8.1 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ahmed Lachheb, Victoria Abramenka-Lachheb, Stephanie Moore, Colin Gray
{"title":"设计伦理在维护学生隐私中的作用:对高等教育中学习设计师的行动呼吁","authors":"Ahmed Lachheb,&nbsp;Victoria Abramenka-Lachheb,&nbsp;Stephanie Moore,&nbsp;Colin Gray","doi":"10.1111/bjet.13382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Maintaining students' privacy in higher education, an integral aspect of learning design and technology integration, is not only a matter of policy and law but also a matter of design ethics. Similar to faculty educators, learning designers in higher education play a vital role in maintaining students' privacy by designing learning experiences that rely on online technology integration. Like other professional designers, they need to care for the humans they design for by not producing designs that infringe on their privacy, thus, not causing harm. Recognizing that widely used instructional design models are silent on the topic and do not address ethical considerations such as privacy, we focus this paper on how design ethics can be leveraged by learning designers in higher education in a practical manner, illustrated through authentic examples. We highlight where the ethical responsibility of learning designers comes into the foreground when maintaining students' privacy and well-being, especially in online settings. We outline an existing ethical decision-making framework and show how learning designers can use it as a call to action to protect the students they design for, strengthening their ethical design capacity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <div>\n \n <div>\n \n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\n <p>What is already known about this topic\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Existing codes of ethical standards from well-known learning design organizations call upon learning designers to protect students' privacy without clear guidance on how to do so.</li>\n \n <li>Design ethics within learning design is often discussed in abstract ways with principles that are difficult to apply.</li>\n \n <li>Most, if not all, design models that learning design professionals have learned are either silent on design ethics and/or do not consider ethics as a valid dimension, thus, making design ethics mostly excluded from learning design graduate programs.</li>\n \n <li>Practical means for engaging in ethical design practice are scarce in the field.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>What this paper adds\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>A call for learning designers in higher education to maintain and protect students' privacy and well-being, strengthening their ethical design capacity.</li>\n \n <li>A demonstration of how to use a practical ethical decision-making framework as a designerly tool in designing for learning to maintain and protect students' privacy and well-being.</li>\n \n <li>Authentic examples—in the form of vignettes—of ethical dilemmas/issues that learning designers in higher education could face, focused on students' privacy.</li>\n \n <li>Methods—using a practical ethical decision-making framework—for learning design professionals in higher education, grounded in the philosophy of designers as the guarantors of designs, to be employed to detect situations where students' privacy and best interests are at risk.</li>\n \n <li>A demonstration of how learning designers could make stellar design decisions in service to the students they design for and not to the priorities of other design stakeholders.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>Implications for practice and/or policy\n\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Higher education programs/institutions that prepare/employ learning designers ought to treat the topics of the designer's responsibility and design ethics more explicitly and practically as one of the means to maintain and protect students' privacy, in addition to law and policies.</li>\n \n <li>Learning designers in higher education ought to hold a powerful position in their professional practice to maintain and protect students' privacy and well-being, as an important aspect of their ethical design responsibilities.</li>\n \n <li>Learning designers in higher education ought to adopt a design thinking mindset in order to protect students' privacy by (1) challenging ideas and assumptions regarding technology integration in general and (2) detecting what is known in User Experience (UX) design as “dark patterns” in online course design.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48315,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"54 6","pages":"1653-1670"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjet.13382","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of design ethics in maintaining students' privacy: A call to action to learning designers in higher education\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Lachheb,&nbsp;Victoria Abramenka-Lachheb,&nbsp;Stephanie Moore,&nbsp;Colin Gray\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjet.13382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Maintaining students' privacy in higher education, an integral aspect of learning design and technology integration, is not only a matter of policy and law but also a matter of design ethics. Similar to faculty educators, learning designers in higher education play a vital role in maintaining students' privacy by designing learning experiences that rely on online technology integration. Like other professional designers, they need to care for the humans they design for by not producing designs that infringe on their privacy, thus, not causing harm. Recognizing that widely used instructional design models are silent on the topic and do not address ethical considerations such as privacy, we focus this paper on how design ethics can be leveraged by learning designers in higher education in a practical manner, illustrated through authentic examples. We highlight where the ethical responsibility of learning designers comes into the foreground when maintaining students' privacy and well-being, especially in online settings. We outline an existing ethical decision-making framework and show how learning designers can use it as a call to action to protect the students they design for, strengthening their ethical design capacity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <div>\\n \\n <div>\\n \\n <h3>Practitioner notes</h3>\\n <p>What is already known about this topic\\n\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Existing codes of ethical standards from well-known learning design organizations call upon learning designers to protect students' privacy without clear guidance on how to do so.</li>\\n \\n <li>Design ethics within learning design is often discussed in abstract ways with principles that are difficult to apply.</li>\\n \\n <li>Most, if not all, design models that learning design professionals have learned are either silent on design ethics and/or do not consider ethics as a valid dimension, thus, making design ethics mostly excluded from learning design graduate programs.</li>\\n \\n <li>Practical means for engaging in ethical design practice are scarce in the field.</li>\\n </ul>\\n <p>What this paper adds\\n\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>A call for learning designers in higher education to maintain and protect students' privacy and well-being, strengthening their ethical design capacity.</li>\\n \\n <li>A demonstration of how to use a practical ethical decision-making framework as a designerly tool in designing for learning to maintain and protect students' privacy and well-being.</li>\\n \\n <li>Authentic examples—in the form of vignettes—of ethical dilemmas/issues that learning designers in higher education could face, focused on students' privacy.</li>\\n \\n <li>Methods—using a practical ethical decision-making framework—for learning design professionals in higher education, grounded in the philosophy of designers as the guarantors of designs, to be employed to detect situations where students' privacy and best interests are at risk.</li>\\n \\n <li>A demonstration of how learning designers could make stellar design decisions in service to the students they design for and not to the priorities of other design stakeholders.</li>\\n </ul>\\n <p>Implications for practice and/or policy\\n\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Higher education programs/institutions that prepare/employ learning designers ought to treat the topics of the designer's responsibility and design ethics more explicitly and practically as one of the means to maintain and protect students' privacy, in addition to law and policies.</li>\\n \\n <li>Learning designers in higher education ought to hold a powerful position in their professional practice to maintain and protect students' privacy and well-being, as an important aspect of their ethical design responsibilities.</li>\\n \\n <li>Learning designers in higher education ought to adopt a design thinking mindset in order to protect students' privacy by (1) challenging ideas and assumptions regarding technology integration in general and (2) detecting what is known in User Experience (UX) design as “dark patterns” in online course design.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Educational Technology\",\"volume\":\"54 6\",\"pages\":\"1653-1670\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjet.13382\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Educational Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13382\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.13382","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在高等教育中,维护学生的隐私是学习设计与技术融合的一个重要方面,这不仅是一个政策和法律问题,也是一个设计伦理问题。与教师教育工作者类似,高等教育中的学习设计师通过设计依赖在线技术集成的学习体验,在维护学生隐私方面发挥着至关重要的作用。像其他专业设计师一样,他们需要关心他们为之设计的人,不生产侵犯他们隐私的设计,因此,不造成伤害。认识到广泛使用的教学设计模型对该主题保持沉默,并且没有解决诸如隐私之类的道德考虑,我们将本文的重点放在如何以实际的方式利用设计伦理,通过真实的例子说明高等教育中的学习设计师。我们强调,在维护学生的隐私和福祉时,学习设计师的道德责任显得尤为重要,尤其是在在线环境中。我们概述了现有的道德决策框架,并展示了学习设计师如何将其作为一种行动呼吁,以保护他们设计的学生,加强他们的道德设计能力。众所周知的学习设计组织的现有道德标准要求学习设计师保护学生的隐私,但却没有明确的指导。学习设计中的设计伦理通常以抽象的方式讨论,其原则难以应用。大多数(如果不是全部的话)学习设计专业人员所学到的设计模型要么对设计伦理保持沉默,要么不认为伦理是一个有效的维度,因此,设计伦理大多被排除在学习设计研究生课程之外。从事伦理设计实践的实际手段在该领域是稀缺的。本文呼吁高等教育学习设计师维护和保护学生的隐私和福祉,加强他们的道德设计能力。演示如何使用实用的道德决策框架作为设计师的工具来设计学习,以维护和保护学生的隐私和福祉。真实的例子——以小插曲的形式——高等教育的学习设计师可能面临的道德困境/问题,集中在学生的隐私上。方法-使用实用的道德决策框架-为高等教育中的学习设计专业人员,以设计师作为设计保证者的理念为基础,用于检测学生隐私和最佳利益受到威胁的情况。这篇文章展示了学习型设计师如何为学生做出卓越的设计决策,而不是为其他设计利益相关者的优先级服务。对实践和/或政策的启示:除了法律和政策之外,高等教育项目/机构应该更明确、更实际地对待设计师的责任和设计伦理,作为维护和保护学生隐私的手段之一。高等教育的学习设计师应该在他们的专业实践中保持强大的地位,以维护和保护学生的隐私和福祉,作为他们道德设计责任的一个重要方面。高等教育的学习设计师应该采用设计思维的心态,通过(1)挑战一般关于技术集成的想法和假设,(2)检测用户体验(UX)设计中所谓的在线课程设计中的“黑暗模式”来保护学生的隐私。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The role of design ethics in maintaining students' privacy: A call to action to learning designers in higher education

The role of design ethics in maintaining students' privacy: A call to action to learning designers in higher education

Maintaining students' privacy in higher education, an integral aspect of learning design and technology integration, is not only a matter of policy and law but also a matter of design ethics. Similar to faculty educators, learning designers in higher education play a vital role in maintaining students' privacy by designing learning experiences that rely on online technology integration. Like other professional designers, they need to care for the humans they design for by not producing designs that infringe on their privacy, thus, not causing harm. Recognizing that widely used instructional design models are silent on the topic and do not address ethical considerations such as privacy, we focus this paper on how design ethics can be leveraged by learning designers in higher education in a practical manner, illustrated through authentic examples. We highlight where the ethical responsibility of learning designers comes into the foreground when maintaining students' privacy and well-being, especially in online settings. We outline an existing ethical decision-making framework and show how learning designers can use it as a call to action to protect the students they design for, strengthening their ethical design capacity.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic

  • Existing codes of ethical standards from well-known learning design organizations call upon learning designers to protect students' privacy without clear guidance on how to do so.
  • Design ethics within learning design is often discussed in abstract ways with principles that are difficult to apply.
  • Most, if not all, design models that learning design professionals have learned are either silent on design ethics and/or do not consider ethics as a valid dimension, thus, making design ethics mostly excluded from learning design graduate programs.
  • Practical means for engaging in ethical design practice are scarce in the field.

What this paper adds

  • A call for learning designers in higher education to maintain and protect students' privacy and well-being, strengthening their ethical design capacity.
  • A demonstration of how to use a practical ethical decision-making framework as a designerly tool in designing for learning to maintain and protect students' privacy and well-being.
  • Authentic examples—in the form of vignettes—of ethical dilemmas/issues that learning designers in higher education could face, focused on students' privacy.
  • Methods—using a practical ethical decision-making framework—for learning design professionals in higher education, grounded in the philosophy of designers as the guarantors of designs, to be employed to detect situations where students' privacy and best interests are at risk.
  • A demonstration of how learning designers could make stellar design decisions in service to the students they design for and not to the priorities of other design stakeholders.

Implications for practice and/or policy

  • Higher education programs/institutions that prepare/employ learning designers ought to treat the topics of the designer's responsibility and design ethics more explicitly and practically as one of the means to maintain and protect students' privacy, in addition to law and policies.
  • Learning designers in higher education ought to hold a powerful position in their professional practice to maintain and protect students' privacy and well-being, as an important aspect of their ethical design responsibilities.
  • Learning designers in higher education ought to adopt a design thinking mindset in order to protect students' privacy by (1) challenging ideas and assumptions regarding technology integration in general and (2) detecting what is known in User Experience (UX) design as “dark patterns” in online course design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Educational Technology
British Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: BJET is a primary source for academics and professionals in the fields of digital educational and training technology throughout the world. The Journal is published by Wiley on behalf of The British Educational Research Association (BERA). It publishes theoretical perspectives, methodological developments and high quality empirical research that demonstrate whether and how applications of instructional/educational technology systems, networks, tools and resources lead to improvements in formal and non-formal education at all levels, from early years through to higher, technical and vocational education, professional development and corporate training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信