Y. Bakar, A. Tuğral, A. Ozel, Y. D. Altuntaş, Y. Yakut
{"title":"土耳其人群久坐行为问卷的信度和效度:心理测量特性的评估","authors":"Y. Bakar, A. Tuğral, A. Ozel, Y. D. Altuntaş, Y. Yakut","doi":"10.5812/MEJRH.63576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Inactivityandsedentarylifestyleareawell-knownriskfactorsforhealtheffects. Manyquestionnairesevaluatephysi-calactivity(PA)level;however,theevaluationof sedentarybehaviorneedsmoreattention. Sedentarybehaviorquestionnaire(SBQ) isareliable,valid,andeasy-to-administertool. Thecurrentstudyaimedatcross-culturallyadaptingandassessingthereliabilityand validity of the Turkish version of SBQ. Methods: SBQ consists of 9 items related to sedentary lifestyle both on weekdays and weekends. SBQ was administrated to 235 participantswiththeattritionrateof 24%,followedbyarepeatedadministrationafter7daystoassessitsreliability. Criterion-related validitywasanalyzedwiththeinternationalphysicalactivityquestionnaire-shortform(IPAQ-SF)withintheconstructvalidityof the SBQ.Test-retestreliabilitywasassessedbytheintraclasscorrelationcoefficient(ICC),whiletheSpearmanrhowasusedforcriterion-related validity. Results: The ICC scores for each parameter ranged from 0.388 to 0.771. The obtained results showed moderate to good test-retest reliability. The validity results of SBQ somewhat violated the standards, which are generally accepted. Items of SBQ “watching TV (includingvideosonVCD/DVD)”,“sittingandtalkingonthephoneorbeingbusyonthephone”,and“doingpaperworkorcomputer work (office work, e-mails, paying bills, etc.)” correlated significantly with body mass index (BMI) (r = -0.138 to 0.247, P < 0.05). Conclusions: The SBQ had good reliability and acceptable validity to assess sedentary behaviors in a Turkish population.","PeriodicalId":36354,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and Validity of Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire in Turkish Population: Evaluation of Psychometric Properties\",\"authors\":\"Y. Bakar, A. Tuğral, A. Ozel, Y. D. Altuntaş, Y. Yakut\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/MEJRH.63576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Inactivityandsedentarylifestyleareawell-knownriskfactorsforhealtheffects. Manyquestionnairesevaluatephysi-calactivity(PA)level;however,theevaluationof sedentarybehaviorneedsmoreattention. Sedentarybehaviorquestionnaire(SBQ) isareliable,valid,andeasy-to-administertool. Thecurrentstudyaimedatcross-culturallyadaptingandassessingthereliabilityand validity of the Turkish version of SBQ. Methods: SBQ consists of 9 items related to sedentary lifestyle both on weekdays and weekends. SBQ was administrated to 235 participantswiththeattritionrateof 24%,followedbyarepeatedadministrationafter7daystoassessitsreliability. Criterion-related validitywasanalyzedwiththeinternationalphysicalactivityquestionnaire-shortform(IPAQ-SF)withintheconstructvalidityof the SBQ.Test-retestreliabilitywasassessedbytheintraclasscorrelationcoefficient(ICC),whiletheSpearmanrhowasusedforcriterion-related validity. Results: The ICC scores for each parameter ranged from 0.388 to 0.771. The obtained results showed moderate to good test-retest reliability. The validity results of SBQ somewhat violated the standards, which are generally accepted. Items of SBQ “watching TV (includingvideosonVCD/DVD)”,“sittingandtalkingonthephoneorbeingbusyonthephone”,and“doingpaperworkorcomputer work (office work, e-mails, paying bills, etc.)” correlated significantly with body mass index (BMI) (r = -0.138 to 0.247, P < 0.05). Conclusions: The SBQ had good reliability and acceptable validity to assess sedentary behaviors in a Turkish population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/MEJRH.63576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/MEJRH.63576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliability and Validity of Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire in Turkish Population: Evaluation of Psychometric Properties
Background: Inactivityandsedentarylifestyleareawell-knownriskfactorsforhealtheffects. Manyquestionnairesevaluatephysi-calactivity(PA)level;however,theevaluationof sedentarybehaviorneedsmoreattention. Sedentarybehaviorquestionnaire(SBQ) isareliable,valid,andeasy-to-administertool. Thecurrentstudyaimedatcross-culturallyadaptingandassessingthereliabilityand validity of the Turkish version of SBQ. Methods: SBQ consists of 9 items related to sedentary lifestyle both on weekdays and weekends. SBQ was administrated to 235 participantswiththeattritionrateof 24%,followedbyarepeatedadministrationafter7daystoassessitsreliability. Criterion-related validitywasanalyzedwiththeinternationalphysicalactivityquestionnaire-shortform(IPAQ-SF)withintheconstructvalidityof the SBQ.Test-retestreliabilitywasassessedbytheintraclasscorrelationcoefficient(ICC),whiletheSpearmanrhowasusedforcriterion-related validity. Results: The ICC scores for each parameter ranged from 0.388 to 0.771. The obtained results showed moderate to good test-retest reliability. The validity results of SBQ somewhat violated the standards, which are generally accepted. Items of SBQ “watching TV (includingvideosonVCD/DVD)”,“sittingandtalkingonthephoneorbeingbusyonthephone”,and“doingpaperworkorcomputer work (office work, e-mails, paying bills, etc.)” correlated significantly with body mass index (BMI) (r = -0.138 to 0.247, P < 0.05). Conclusions: The SBQ had good reliability and acceptable validity to assess sedentary behaviors in a Turkish population.