高校图书馆员的教学身份因其多年的教学经验而异

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Michelle DuBroy
{"title":"高校图书馆员的教学身份因其多年的教学经验而异","authors":"Michelle DuBroy","doi":"10.18438/eblip30118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Review of:\nNichols Hess, A. (2020). Instructional experience and teaching identities: How academic librarians' years of experience in instruction impact their perceptions of themselves as educators. Communications in Information Literacy, 14(2), 153–180. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.2.1\nAbstract\nObjective – To examine how an academic librarian’s years of instructional experience impacts how they think of themselves as instructors.\nDesign – Survey questionnaire.\nSetting – American academic library profession.\nSubjects – 353 participants selected from 501 respondents.\nMethods – A Qualtrics survey was sent via email to members of several American Library Association discussion lists. The author selected a subset of respondents for further analysis based on how they answered key questions on the survey. Selected participants were those who believed they had experienced perspective transformation around their teaching identities. The author used principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to identify twelve transformative constructs across three sub-themes: relational, experiential, and professional inputs. The author then labelled each construct based on its respective component parts. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were then conducted using SPSS.\nMain Results – Statistically significant differences were found between experienced and inexperienced instructional librarians. Participants with more instructional experience tend to believe their teaching identities are influenced to a greater extent by these factors:\n\nInterpersonal relationships\nFeedback from colleagues outside of librarianship\nSelf-directed learning opportunities\n\nParticipants with less instructional experience tend to believe their teaching identities are influenced to a greater extent by these factors:\n\nFeedback from those within librarianship\nLibrary-centric inputs such as their formal library studies\n\nConclusion – Different types of professional development opportunities will appeal to different librarians based on their level of instructional experience. Less experienced librarian instructors may find mentoring and informal collegial relationships within the library to be beneficial. More experienced librarian instructors may prefer to seek out relationships with colleagues outside the library to further develop their teaching identities.","PeriodicalId":45227,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic Librarians Develop Their Teaching Identities Differently Depending on Their Years of Instructional Experience\",\"authors\":\"Michelle DuBroy\",\"doi\":\"10.18438/eblip30118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Review of:\\nNichols Hess, A. (2020). Instructional experience and teaching identities: How academic librarians' years of experience in instruction impact their perceptions of themselves as educators. Communications in Information Literacy, 14(2), 153–180. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.2.1\\nAbstract\\nObjective – To examine how an academic librarian’s years of instructional experience impacts how they think of themselves as instructors.\\nDesign – Survey questionnaire.\\nSetting – American academic library profession.\\nSubjects – 353 participants selected from 501 respondents.\\nMethods – A Qualtrics survey was sent via email to members of several American Library Association discussion lists. The author selected a subset of respondents for further analysis based on how they answered key questions on the survey. Selected participants were those who believed they had experienced perspective transformation around their teaching identities. The author used principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to identify twelve transformative constructs across three sub-themes: relational, experiential, and professional inputs. The author then labelled each construct based on its respective component parts. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were then conducted using SPSS.\\nMain Results – Statistically significant differences were found between experienced and inexperienced instructional librarians. Participants with more instructional experience tend to believe their teaching identities are influenced to a greater extent by these factors:\\n\\nInterpersonal relationships\\nFeedback from colleagues outside of librarianship\\nSelf-directed learning opportunities\\n\\nParticipants with less instructional experience tend to believe their teaching identities are influenced to a greater extent by these factors:\\n\\nFeedback from those within librarianship\\nLibrary-centric inputs such as their formal library studies\\n\\nConclusion – Different types of professional development opportunities will appeal to different librarians based on their level of instructional experience. Less experienced librarian instructors may find mentoring and informal collegial relationships within the library to be beneficial. More experienced librarian instructors may prefer to seek out relationships with colleagues outside the library to further develop their teaching identities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾:Nichols Hess, A.(2020)。教学经验和教学身份:学术图书馆员多年的教学经验如何影响他们对自己作为教育者的看法。信息素养中的传播,14(2),153-180。https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.2.1AbstractObjective -研究学术图书管理员多年的教学经验如何影响他们如何看待自己作为教师。设计-调查问卷。背景——美国学术图书馆行业。受试者——从501名受访者中选出353名参与者。方法-通过电子邮件向几个美国图书馆协会讨论列表的成员发送质量调查。作者根据受访者如何回答调查中的关键问题,选择了一部分受访者进行进一步分析。被选中的参与者是那些认为自己在教学身份方面经历了观点转变的人。作者使用主成分分析和验证性因子分析来确定跨三个子主题的十二个变革性结构:关系,经验和专业投入。然后,作者根据其各自的组成部分标记每个结构。然后使用SPSS进行单因素方差分析(ANOVA)检验。主要结果-在有经验和没有经验的教学馆员之间发现了统计上显著的差异。具有更多教学经验的参与者倾向于相信他们的教学身份在更大程度上受到这些因素的影响:人际关系、图书馆以外的同事的反馈、自主学习机会、教学经验较少的参与者倾向于相信他们的教学身份在更大程度上受到这些因素的影响:图书馆内部的反馈、以图书馆为中心的输入,如他们的正式图书馆研究结论——不同类型的专业发展机会将根据不同的图书馆员的教学经验水平而吸引不同的图书馆员。经验不足的图书馆员指导员可能会发现图书馆内的指导和非正式的学院关系是有益的。更有经验的图书馆员教师可能更愿意与图书馆外的同事建立关系,以进一步发展他们的教学身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Academic Librarians Develop Their Teaching Identities Differently Depending on Their Years of Instructional Experience
A Review of: Nichols Hess, A. (2020). Instructional experience and teaching identities: How academic librarians' years of experience in instruction impact their perceptions of themselves as educators. Communications in Information Literacy, 14(2), 153–180. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.2.1 Abstract Objective – To examine how an academic librarian’s years of instructional experience impacts how they think of themselves as instructors. Design – Survey questionnaire. Setting – American academic library profession. Subjects – 353 participants selected from 501 respondents. Methods – A Qualtrics survey was sent via email to members of several American Library Association discussion lists. The author selected a subset of respondents for further analysis based on how they answered key questions on the survey. Selected participants were those who believed they had experienced perspective transformation around their teaching identities. The author used principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to identify twelve transformative constructs across three sub-themes: relational, experiential, and professional inputs. The author then labelled each construct based on its respective component parts. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were then conducted using SPSS. Main Results – Statistically significant differences were found between experienced and inexperienced instructional librarians. Participants with more instructional experience tend to believe their teaching identities are influenced to a greater extent by these factors: Interpersonal relationships Feedback from colleagues outside of librarianship Self-directed learning opportunities Participants with less instructional experience tend to believe their teaching identities are influenced to a greater extent by these factors: Feedback from those within librarianship Library-centric inputs such as their formal library studies Conclusion – Different types of professional development opportunities will appeal to different librarians based on their level of instructional experience. Less experienced librarian instructors may find mentoring and informal collegial relationships within the library to be beneficial. More experienced librarian instructors may prefer to seek out relationships with colleagues outside the library to further develop their teaching identities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信