M. Gast, J. Chisholm, Yohimar Sivira-Gonzalez, Trisha A. Douin
{"title":"定性访谈中的种族化时刻:实时面对色盲和微妙的种族主义","authors":"M. Gast, J. Chisholm, Yohimar Sivira-Gonzalez, Trisha A. Douin","doi":"10.1080/1743727X.2022.2046726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Colour-blind discourse represents dominant American racial ideologies surrounding principles of equal opportunity and assumptions that racism and systemic racial inequities are things of the past, ‘naturally occurring’ issues, or problems relegated to individual choices and behaviours. Qualitative researchers who seek to disrupt the legitimation of Whiteness and colour-blind and subtle racism can respond to these forms of injustices during interviews and conversations; yet, past work rarely highlights the researcher and researcher challenges in these processes. Additionally, traditional methodologies typically push researchers to reflect on racism and injustices after such moments have passed or to miss them altogether. We analyse the potential and constraints of qualitative educational researchers in responding to such moments in real time. We use a case study of a high school peer-mentoring programme with multilingual and emerging multilingual students of colour and teachers to unpack prevailing racial tensions and assumptions during interviews and situate ourselves, as qualitative researchers, in those processes. We discuss how research team-members can collectively prepare to challenge colour-blind ideological stances through active interviewing and reflexivity-in-practice, opportunities for counternarratives, engaging White allies, and partnerships with schools for critical conversations.","PeriodicalId":51655,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racialized moments in qualitative interviews: confronting colour-blind and subtle racism in real time\",\"authors\":\"M. Gast, J. Chisholm, Yohimar Sivira-Gonzalez, Trisha A. Douin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1743727X.2022.2046726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Colour-blind discourse represents dominant American racial ideologies surrounding principles of equal opportunity and assumptions that racism and systemic racial inequities are things of the past, ‘naturally occurring’ issues, or problems relegated to individual choices and behaviours. Qualitative researchers who seek to disrupt the legitimation of Whiteness and colour-blind and subtle racism can respond to these forms of injustices during interviews and conversations; yet, past work rarely highlights the researcher and researcher challenges in these processes. Additionally, traditional methodologies typically push researchers to reflect on racism and injustices after such moments have passed or to miss them altogether. We analyse the potential and constraints of qualitative educational researchers in responding to such moments in real time. We use a case study of a high school peer-mentoring programme with multilingual and emerging multilingual students of colour and teachers to unpack prevailing racial tensions and assumptions during interviews and situate ourselves, as qualitative researchers, in those processes. We discuss how research team-members can collectively prepare to challenge colour-blind ideological stances through active interviewing and reflexivity-in-practice, opportunities for counternarratives, engaging White allies, and partnerships with schools for critical conversations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Research & Method in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Research & Method in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2046726\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2046726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Racialized moments in qualitative interviews: confronting colour-blind and subtle racism in real time
ABSTRACT Colour-blind discourse represents dominant American racial ideologies surrounding principles of equal opportunity and assumptions that racism and systemic racial inequities are things of the past, ‘naturally occurring’ issues, or problems relegated to individual choices and behaviours. Qualitative researchers who seek to disrupt the legitimation of Whiteness and colour-blind and subtle racism can respond to these forms of injustices during interviews and conversations; yet, past work rarely highlights the researcher and researcher challenges in these processes. Additionally, traditional methodologies typically push researchers to reflect on racism and injustices after such moments have passed or to miss them altogether. We analyse the potential and constraints of qualitative educational researchers in responding to such moments in real time. We use a case study of a high school peer-mentoring programme with multilingual and emerging multilingual students of colour and teachers to unpack prevailing racial tensions and assumptions during interviews and situate ourselves, as qualitative researchers, in those processes. We discuss how research team-members can collectively prepare to challenge colour-blind ideological stances through active interviewing and reflexivity-in-practice, opportunities for counternarratives, engaging White allies, and partnerships with schools for critical conversations.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Research & Method in Education is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that draws contributions from a wide community of international researchers. Contributions are expected to develop and further international discourse in educational research with a particular focus on method and methodological issues. The journal welcomes papers engaging with methods from within a qualitative or quantitative framework, or from frameworks which cut across and or challenge this duality. Papers should not solely focus on the practice of education; there must be a contribution to methodology. International Journal of Research & Method in Education is committed to publishing scholarly research that discusses conceptual, theoretical and methodological issues, provides evidence, support for or informed critique of unusual or new methodologies within educational research and provides innovative, new perspectives and examinations of key research findings. The journal’s enthusiasm to foster debate is also recognised in a keenness to include engaged, thought-provoking response papers to previously published articles. The journal is also interested in papers that discuss issues in the teaching of research methods for educational researchers. Contributors to International Journal of Research & Method in Education should take care to communicate their findings or arguments in a succinct, accessible manner to an international readership of researchers, policy-makers and practitioners from a range of disciplines including but not limited to philosophy, sociology, economics, psychology, and history of education. The Co-Editors welcome suggested topics for future Special Issues. Initial ideas should be discussed by email with the Co-Editors before a formal proposal is submitted for consideration.