分析-综合区分与社会科学

Jan-Erik Lane
{"title":"分析-综合区分与社会科学","authors":"Jan-Erik Lane","doi":"10.17265/2159-5313/2022.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analytical-synthetic distinction keeps being of great interest. But why? Analytical sentences are camouflaged tautologies . They are not falsifiable, neither in this Kant’s world or in any of Leibniz’ possible worlds.","PeriodicalId":69353,"journal":{"name":"哲学研究:英文版","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Analytic-Synthetic Distinction and the Social Sciences\",\"authors\":\"Jan-Erik Lane\",\"doi\":\"10.17265/2159-5313/2022.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The analytical-synthetic distinction keeps being of great interest. But why? Analytical sentences are camouflaged tautologies . They are not falsifiable, neither in this Kant’s world or in any of Leibniz’ possible worlds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":69353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"哲学研究:英文版\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"哲学研究:英文版\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2022.10.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"哲学研究:英文版","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5313/2022.10.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分析与综合的区别一直引起人们极大的兴趣。但是为什么呢?分析句是伪装的重言式。它们是不可证伪的,无论是在康德的世界里还是在莱布尼茨的可能世界里。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Analytic-Synthetic Distinction and the Social Sciences
The analytical-synthetic distinction keeps being of great interest. But why? Analytical sentences are camouflaged tautologies . They are not falsifiable, neither in this Kant’s world or in any of Leibniz’ possible worlds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
665
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信