评估表达性写作减轻焦虑症状效果的随机对照试验:候补对照设计

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
S. Robertson, Stephen D. Short, D. McSween, Shaina Medlen, Katie Schneider
{"title":"评估表达性写作减轻焦虑症状效果的随机对照试验:候补对照设计","authors":"S. Robertson, Stephen D. Short, D. McSween, Shaina Medlen, Katie Schneider","doi":"10.1521/jscp.2021.40.6.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There are mixed data in the literature regarding the efficacy of expressive writing (EW) interventions. The current study utilized a waitlist control design to assess whether symptom change occurred during a waitlist period and an intervention period. We also assessed the potential relationship between initial anxiety symptom severity and follow-up scores of anxiety. Methods: One hundred forty-one first-year college students were randomly assigned to either (a) initiate an EW protocol immediately or (b) initiate an EW protocol after at least four weeks had elapsed. All participants completed three consecutive days of EW and two follow-up visits. Results: Participants who started their EW protocol immediately demonstrated a significant decrease in anxiety at the one-month follow-up while participants in the waitlist condition did not demonstrate a significant decrease in anxiety during the waiting period. All participants demonstrated a significant decrease in anxiety between the first day of the EW intervention and the six-month follow-up visit. This effect was moderated by initial anxiety symptom level. Discussion: Completing an EW intervention, whether immediately or after a one-month waiting period, was associated with lowered anxiety scores six months post-intervention. College students’ anxiety levels did not naturally improve over the course of a one-month waiting period.","PeriodicalId":48202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Expressive Writing in Reducing Symptoms of Anxiety: Waitlist Control Design\",\"authors\":\"S. Robertson, Stephen D. Short, D. McSween, Shaina Medlen, Katie Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/jscp.2021.40.6.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: There are mixed data in the literature regarding the efficacy of expressive writing (EW) interventions. The current study utilized a waitlist control design to assess whether symptom change occurred during a waitlist period and an intervention period. We also assessed the potential relationship between initial anxiety symptom severity and follow-up scores of anxiety. Methods: One hundred forty-one first-year college students were randomly assigned to either (a) initiate an EW protocol immediately or (b) initiate an EW protocol after at least four weeks had elapsed. All participants completed three consecutive days of EW and two follow-up visits. Results: Participants who started their EW protocol immediately demonstrated a significant decrease in anxiety at the one-month follow-up while participants in the waitlist condition did not demonstrate a significant decrease in anxiety during the waiting period. All participants demonstrated a significant decrease in anxiety between the first day of the EW intervention and the six-month follow-up visit. This effect was moderated by initial anxiety symptom level. Discussion: Completing an EW intervention, whether immediately or after a one-month waiting period, was associated with lowered anxiety scores six months post-intervention. College students’ anxiety levels did not naturally improve over the course of a one-month waiting period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2021.40.6.54\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2021.40.6.54","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

关于表达性写作(EW)干预的有效性,文献中有不同的数据。目前的研究采用了候补名单控制设计来评估在候补名单期间和干预期间是否发生症状改变。我们还评估了初始焦虑症状严重程度与随访焦虑评分之间的潜在关系。方法:141名大学一年级学生被随机分配到(a)立即开始一个EW方案或(b)在至少四周后开始一个EW方案。所有参与者都完成了连续三天的EW和两次随访。结果:立即开始EW方案的参与者在一个月的随访中表现出显著的焦虑减少,而等待名单条件的参与者在等待期间没有表现出显著的焦虑减少。在EW干预的第一天和六个月的随访期间,所有参与者的焦虑程度都显著降低。这种效应被初始焦虑症状水平所缓和。讨论:完成EW干预,无论是立即还是在一个月的等待期后,与干预后6个月的焦虑评分降低有关。在一个月的等待期中,大学生的焦虑水平并没有自然改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Expressive Writing in Reducing Symptoms of Anxiety: Waitlist Control Design
Introduction: There are mixed data in the literature regarding the efficacy of expressive writing (EW) interventions. The current study utilized a waitlist control design to assess whether symptom change occurred during a waitlist period and an intervention period. We also assessed the potential relationship between initial anxiety symptom severity and follow-up scores of anxiety. Methods: One hundred forty-one first-year college students were randomly assigned to either (a) initiate an EW protocol immediately or (b) initiate an EW protocol after at least four weeks had elapsed. All participants completed three consecutive days of EW and two follow-up visits. Results: Participants who started their EW protocol immediately demonstrated a significant decrease in anxiety at the one-month follow-up while participants in the waitlist condition did not demonstrate a significant decrease in anxiety during the waiting period. All participants demonstrated a significant decrease in anxiety between the first day of the EW intervention and the six-month follow-up visit. This effect was moderated by initial anxiety symptom level. Discussion: Completing an EW intervention, whether immediately or after a one-month waiting period, was associated with lowered anxiety scores six months post-intervention. College students’ anxiety levels did not naturally improve over the course of a one-month waiting period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: This journal is devoted to the application of theory and research from social psychology toward the better understanding of human adaptation and adjustment, including both the alleviation of psychological problems and distress (e.g., psychopathology) and the enhancement of psychological well-being among the psychologically healthy. Topics of interest include (but are not limited to) traditionally defined psychopathology (e.g., depression), common emotional and behavioral problems in living (e.g., conflicts in close relationships), the enhancement of subjective well-being, and the processes of psychological change in everyday life (e.g., self-regulation) and professional settings (e.g., psychotherapy and counseling). Articles reporting the results of theory-driven empirical research are given priority, but theoretical articles, review articles, clinical case studies, and essays on professional issues are also welcome. Articles describing the development of new scales (personality or otherwise) or the revision of existing scales are not appropriate for this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信