邓菲结果框架(DOF)的可靠性和简短版本:整合舞蹈动作治疗的艺术和科学

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
K. Dunphy , P. Lebre , E. Dumaresq , S.A. Schoenenberger-Howie , J. Geipel , S.C. Koch
{"title":"邓菲结果框架(DOF)的可靠性和简短版本:整合舞蹈动作治疗的艺术和科学","authors":"K. Dunphy ,&nbsp;P. Lebre ,&nbsp;E. Dumaresq ,&nbsp;S.A. Schoenenberger-Howie ,&nbsp;J. Geipel ,&nbsp;S.C. Koch","doi":"10.1016/j.aip.2023.102063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is an increasing requirement of evidence-based outcome frameworks in the health sciences. This article presents the <em>Dunphy Outcomes Framework (DOF)</em> for dance movement therapy (DMT), the first generic outcomes framework for DMT. The framework is posited to measure outcomes intrinsic to DMT, and comprehensive for all client groups and contexts. It is therefore suggested as suitable for assessment of DMT interventions and clients’ progress. The DOF comprises six domains (physical, cultural, cognitive, emotional, social and integration), further divided into sub-domains and objectives. Informed by theory and evidence, both from published research and professional practice, the DOF has been developed through an extensive Delphi-like consultation process. The article presents the DOF and data on its reliability and validity. Reliability testing confirmed the factor structure of the original DOF with very good scale homogeneity and excellent interrater-reliability. Heuristically based on the results of an exploratory factor analysis that yielded six dimensions – five corresponding to the original DOF domains, with a slightly different weight of factors – a short version of the DOF <em>(DOF-BREVE</em>) is proposed. Benefits and limitations of the DOF as an assessment tool for the profession of DMT and creative arts therapies are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47590,"journal":{"name":"Arts in Psychotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and short version of the Dunphy Outcomes Framework (DOF): Integrating the art and science of dance movement therapy\",\"authors\":\"K. Dunphy ,&nbsp;P. Lebre ,&nbsp;E. Dumaresq ,&nbsp;S.A. Schoenenberger-Howie ,&nbsp;J. Geipel ,&nbsp;S.C. Koch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aip.2023.102063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is an increasing requirement of evidence-based outcome frameworks in the health sciences. This article presents the <em>Dunphy Outcomes Framework (DOF)</em> for dance movement therapy (DMT), the first generic outcomes framework for DMT. The framework is posited to measure outcomes intrinsic to DMT, and comprehensive for all client groups and contexts. It is therefore suggested as suitable for assessment of DMT interventions and clients’ progress. The DOF comprises six domains (physical, cultural, cognitive, emotional, social and integration), further divided into sub-domains and objectives. Informed by theory and evidence, both from published research and professional practice, the DOF has been developed through an extensive Delphi-like consultation process. The article presents the DOF and data on its reliability and validity. Reliability testing confirmed the factor structure of the original DOF with very good scale homogeneity and excellent interrater-reliability. Heuristically based on the results of an exploratory factor analysis that yielded six dimensions – five corresponding to the original DOF domains, with a slightly different weight of factors – a short version of the DOF <em>(DOF-BREVE</em>) is proposed. Benefits and limitations of the DOF as an assessment tool for the profession of DMT and creative arts therapies are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arts in Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arts in Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197455623000709\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts in Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197455623000709","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生科学对循证结果框架的要求越来越高。本文介绍了舞蹈运动治疗(DMT)的Dunphy结果框架(DOF),这是DMT的第一个通用结果框架。该框架旨在衡量DMT固有的结果,并全面适用于所有客户群体和背景。因此,建议它适用于评估DMT干预措施和客户的进展。DOF包括六个领域(身体、文化、认知、情感、社会和整合),并进一步划分为子领域和目标。从已发表的研究和专业实践中获得理论和证据,DOF通过广泛的德尔菲式咨询过程开发出来。本文给出了自由度,并对其信度和效度进行了验证。信度测试证实了原自由度的因子结构具有很好的尺度均匀性和优良的互信度。启发式地基于探索性因子分析的结果,产生了六个维度-五个对应于原始DOF域,因子权重略有不同-提出了DOF的简短版本(DOF- breve)。讨论了DOF作为DMT和创造性艺术治疗专业评估工具的好处和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and short version of the Dunphy Outcomes Framework (DOF): Integrating the art and science of dance movement therapy

There is an increasing requirement of evidence-based outcome frameworks in the health sciences. This article presents the Dunphy Outcomes Framework (DOF) for dance movement therapy (DMT), the first generic outcomes framework for DMT. The framework is posited to measure outcomes intrinsic to DMT, and comprehensive for all client groups and contexts. It is therefore suggested as suitable for assessment of DMT interventions and clients’ progress. The DOF comprises six domains (physical, cultural, cognitive, emotional, social and integration), further divided into sub-domains and objectives. Informed by theory and evidence, both from published research and professional practice, the DOF has been developed through an extensive Delphi-like consultation process. The article presents the DOF and data on its reliability and validity. Reliability testing confirmed the factor structure of the original DOF with very good scale homogeneity and excellent interrater-reliability. Heuristically based on the results of an exploratory factor analysis that yielded six dimensions – five corresponding to the original DOF domains, with a slightly different weight of factors – a short version of the DOF (DOF-BREVE) is proposed. Benefits and limitations of the DOF as an assessment tool for the profession of DMT and creative arts therapies are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: The Arts in Psychotherapy is a dynamic, contemporary journal publishing evidence-based research, expert opinion, theoretical positions, and case material on a wide range of topics intersecting the fields of mental health and creative arts therapies. It is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing 5 issues annually. Papers are welcomed from researchers and practitioners in the fields of art, dance/movement, drama, music, and poetry psychotherapy, as well as expressive and creative arts therapy, neuroscience, psychiatry, education, allied health, and psychology that aim to engage high level theoretical concepts with the rigor of professional practice. The journal welcomes contributions that present new and emergent knowledge about the role of the arts in healthcare, and engage a critical discourse relevant to an international readership that can inform the development of new services and the refinement of existing policies and practices. There is no restriction on research methods and review papers are welcome. From time to time the journal publishes special issues on topics warranting a distinctive focus relevant to the stated goals and scope of the publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信