文化、记忆和证人访谈交叉点的紧迫问题和前景:探索研究和实践的挑战

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Lorraine Hope, Nkansah Anakwah, Jan Antfolk, Sonja P. Brubacher, Heather Flowe, Fiona Gabbert, Ellen Giebels, Wangu Kanja, Julia Korkman, Akira Kyo, Makiko Naka, Henry Otgaar, Martine B. Powell, Hedayat Selim, Jenny Skrifvars, Isaac Kwasi Sorkpah, Emmanuel A. Sowatey, Linda C. Steele, Laura Stevens, Nathanael E. J. Sumampouw, Paul J. Taylor, Javier Trevino-Rangel, Tanja van Veldhuizen, Jianqin Wang, Simon Wells, Anonymous
{"title":"文化、记忆和证人访谈交叉点的紧迫问题和前景:探索研究和实践的挑战","authors":"Lorraine Hope,&nbsp;Nkansah Anakwah,&nbsp;Jan Antfolk,&nbsp;Sonja P. Brubacher,&nbsp;Heather Flowe,&nbsp;Fiona Gabbert,&nbsp;Ellen Giebels,&nbsp;Wangu Kanja,&nbsp;Julia Korkman,&nbsp;Akira Kyo,&nbsp;Makiko Naka,&nbsp;Henry Otgaar,&nbsp;Martine B. Powell,&nbsp;Hedayat Selim,&nbsp;Jenny Skrifvars,&nbsp;Isaac Kwasi Sorkpah,&nbsp;Emmanuel A. Sowatey,&nbsp;Linda C. Steele,&nbsp;Laura Stevens,&nbsp;Nathanael E. J. Sumampouw,&nbsp;Paul J. Taylor,&nbsp;Javier Trevino-Rangel,&nbsp;Tanja van Veldhuizen,&nbsp;Jianqin Wang,&nbsp;Simon Wells,&nbsp;Anonymous","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The pursuit of justice increasingly relies on productive interactions between witnesses and investigators from diverse cultural backgrounds during investigative interviews. To date, the role of cultural context has largely been ignored by researchers in the field of investigative interviewing, despite repeated requests from practitioners and policymakers for evidence-based guidance for the conduct of interviews with people from different cultures. Through examining cultural differences in human memory and communication and considering specific contextual challenges for investigative interviewing through the lens of culture, this review and associated commentaries highlight the scope for considering culture and human diversity in research on, and the practice of, investigative interviewing with victims, witnesses, and other sources. Across 11 commentaries, contributors highlight the importance of considering the role of culture in different investigative interviewing practices (e.g., rapport building, questioning techniques) and contexts (e.g., gender-based violence, asylum seeking, child abuse), address common areas of cultural mismatch between interviewer–interviewee expectations, and identify critical future routes for research. We call for an increased focus in the investigative interviewing literature on the nature and needs of our global community and encourage constructive and collaborative discussion between researchers and practitioners from around the world to better identify specific challenges and work together towards evidence-based solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lcrp.12202","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urgent issues and prospects at the intersection of culture, memory, and witness interviews: Exploring the challenges for research and practice\",\"authors\":\"Lorraine Hope,&nbsp;Nkansah Anakwah,&nbsp;Jan Antfolk,&nbsp;Sonja P. Brubacher,&nbsp;Heather Flowe,&nbsp;Fiona Gabbert,&nbsp;Ellen Giebels,&nbsp;Wangu Kanja,&nbsp;Julia Korkman,&nbsp;Akira Kyo,&nbsp;Makiko Naka,&nbsp;Henry Otgaar,&nbsp;Martine B. Powell,&nbsp;Hedayat Selim,&nbsp;Jenny Skrifvars,&nbsp;Isaac Kwasi Sorkpah,&nbsp;Emmanuel A. Sowatey,&nbsp;Linda C. Steele,&nbsp;Laura Stevens,&nbsp;Nathanael E. J. Sumampouw,&nbsp;Paul J. Taylor,&nbsp;Javier Trevino-Rangel,&nbsp;Tanja van Veldhuizen,&nbsp;Jianqin Wang,&nbsp;Simon Wells,&nbsp;Anonymous\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lcrp.12202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The pursuit of justice increasingly relies on productive interactions between witnesses and investigators from diverse cultural backgrounds during investigative interviews. To date, the role of cultural context has largely been ignored by researchers in the field of investigative interviewing, despite repeated requests from practitioners and policymakers for evidence-based guidance for the conduct of interviews with people from different cultures. Through examining cultural differences in human memory and communication and considering specific contextual challenges for investigative interviewing through the lens of culture, this review and associated commentaries highlight the scope for considering culture and human diversity in research on, and the practice of, investigative interviewing with victims, witnesses, and other sources. Across 11 commentaries, contributors highlight the importance of considering the role of culture in different investigative interviewing practices (e.g., rapport building, questioning techniques) and contexts (e.g., gender-based violence, asylum seeking, child abuse), address common areas of cultural mismatch between interviewer–interviewee expectations, and identify critical future routes for research. We call for an increased focus in the investigative interviewing literature on the nature and needs of our global community and encourage constructive and collaborative discussion between researchers and practitioners from around the world to better identify specific challenges and work together towards evidence-based solutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal and Criminological Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lcrp.12202\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal and Criminological Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12202\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

在调查采访中,追求正义越来越依赖于来自不同文化背景的证人和调查人员之间富有成效的互动。迄今为止,尽管从业者和政策制定者一再要求对来自不同文化背景的人进行采访时提供基于证据的指导,但在调查访谈领域,文化背景的作用在很大程度上被研究人员忽视了。通过研究人类记忆和交流中的文化差异,并通过文化的视角考虑调查性访谈的具体背景挑战,本综述和相关评论强调了在对受害者、证人和其他来源进行调查性访谈的研究和实践中考虑文化和人类多样性的范围。在11篇评论中,作者强调了考虑文化在易受暗示、采访和潜在的误解中的作用的重要性。努力把重点放在基于证据的挑战上。我们两个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Urgent issues and prospects at the intersection of culture, memory, and witness interviews: Exploring the challenges for research and practice

The pursuit of justice increasingly relies on productive interactions between witnesses and investigators from diverse cultural backgrounds during investigative interviews. To date, the role of cultural context has largely been ignored by researchers in the field of investigative interviewing, despite repeated requests from practitioners and policymakers for evidence-based guidance for the conduct of interviews with people from different cultures. Through examining cultural differences in human memory and communication and considering specific contextual challenges for investigative interviewing through the lens of culture, this review and associated commentaries highlight the scope for considering culture and human diversity in research on, and the practice of, investigative interviewing with victims, witnesses, and other sources. Across 11 commentaries, contributors highlight the importance of considering the role of culture in different investigative interviewing practices (e.g., rapport building, questioning techniques) and contexts (e.g., gender-based violence, asylum seeking, child abuse), address common areas of cultural mismatch between interviewer–interviewee expectations, and identify critical future routes for research. We call for an increased focus in the investigative interviewing literature on the nature and needs of our global community and encourage constructive and collaborative discussion between researchers and practitioners from around the world to better identify specific challenges and work together towards evidence-based solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Legal and Criminological Psychology publishes original papers in all areas of psychology and law: - victimology - policing and crime detection - crime prevention - management of offenders - mental health and the law - public attitudes to law - role of the expert witness - impact of law on behaviour - interviewing and eyewitness testimony - jury decision making - deception The journal publishes papers which advance professional and scientific knowledge defined broadly as the application of psychology to law and interdisciplinary enquiry in legal and psychological fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信