社会排斥与高速铁路:来自中国的证据

Q3 Social Sciences
Labib Azzouz, A. Jack
{"title":"社会排斥与高速铁路:来自中国的证据","authors":"Labib Azzouz, A. Jack","doi":"10.2174/1874447802115010133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Despite their economic, social, and environmental advantages, HSRs are associated with some negative social impacts and controversy about their equitability.\n \n \n \n Very few studies have explored the relationship between HSR and social exclusion.\n \n \n \n This paper examines the relationship between HSR and social exclusion, and it focuses on China as a case study.\n \n \n \n The objectives of the study are as follows; to identify the most important and favourable factors for choosing HSR from passengers' perspective; to reveal issues and reasons that inhibit passengers from using HSR and limit their accessibility to the service, and to propose some solutions and interventions.\n \n \n \n The study utilizes an online survey comprising a set of stated preference and revealed preference questions. A total of 3655 responses were collected, of which 3353 responses were complete and useful.\n \n \n \n A key finding is that comfort is proven to be the most favourable factor for using HSR, followed by travel time and reliability. Another finding is that the economic exclusion followed by the geographical exclusion is prevailing across different age and monthly income groups of non-HSR users. Those who have the lowest income and the elderly experience the strongest levels of economic exclusion. Moreover, physical, time-based, and fear-based exclusions are also notable.\n \n \n \n To create a modal shift from other modes to HSR and allow more groups to access the service, HSR should be competitive in terms of affordability and accessibility. Possible solutions and policy interventions that may help to tackle categories of social exclusion in China are presented.\n","PeriodicalId":38631,"journal":{"name":"Open Transportation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Exclusion and High-Speed Railways: Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Labib Azzouz, A. Jack\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874447802115010133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Despite their economic, social, and environmental advantages, HSRs are associated with some negative social impacts and controversy about their equitability.\\n \\n \\n \\n Very few studies have explored the relationship between HSR and social exclusion.\\n \\n \\n \\n This paper examines the relationship between HSR and social exclusion, and it focuses on China as a case study.\\n \\n \\n \\n The objectives of the study are as follows; to identify the most important and favourable factors for choosing HSR from passengers' perspective; to reveal issues and reasons that inhibit passengers from using HSR and limit their accessibility to the service, and to propose some solutions and interventions.\\n \\n \\n \\n The study utilizes an online survey comprising a set of stated preference and revealed preference questions. A total of 3655 responses were collected, of which 3353 responses were complete and useful.\\n \\n \\n \\n A key finding is that comfort is proven to be the most favourable factor for using HSR, followed by travel time and reliability. Another finding is that the economic exclusion followed by the geographical exclusion is prevailing across different age and monthly income groups of non-HSR users. Those who have the lowest income and the elderly experience the strongest levels of economic exclusion. Moreover, physical, time-based, and fear-based exclusions are also notable.\\n \\n \\n \\n To create a modal shift from other modes to HSR and allow more groups to access the service, HSR should be competitive in terms of affordability and accessibility. Possible solutions and policy interventions that may help to tackle categories of social exclusion in China are presented.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":38631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Transportation Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Transportation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447802115010133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Transportation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447802115010133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

尽管HSR具有经济、社会和环境优势,但也会产生一些负面的社会影响和对其公平性的争议。很少有研究探讨高铁与社会排斥之间的关系。本文考察了高铁与社会排斥之间的关系,并以中国为例进行了研究。研究的目标如下:;从乘客的角度确定选择高铁的最重要和最有利的因素;揭示阻碍乘客使用高铁并限制他们获得服务的问题和原因,并提出一些解决方案和干预措施。该研究采用了一项在线调查,包括一组陈述的偏好和揭示的偏好问题。共收集了3655份回复,其中3353份回复是完整和有用的。一个关键发现是,舒适度被证明是使用高铁的最有利因素,其次是旅行时间和可靠性。另一个发现是,非高铁用户的不同年龄和月收入群体普遍存在经济排斥和地理排斥。那些收入最低的人和老年人受到的经济排斥程度最高。此外,基于身体、时间和恐惧的排除也很显著。为了创造从其他模式到高铁的模式转变,并允许更多的群体获得服务,高铁应该在可负担性和可及性方面具有竞争力。介绍了可能有助于解决中国各类社会排斥问题的解决方案和政策干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Exclusion and High-Speed Railways: Evidence from China
Despite their economic, social, and environmental advantages, HSRs are associated with some negative social impacts and controversy about their equitability. Very few studies have explored the relationship between HSR and social exclusion. This paper examines the relationship between HSR and social exclusion, and it focuses on China as a case study. The objectives of the study are as follows; to identify the most important and favourable factors for choosing HSR from passengers' perspective; to reveal issues and reasons that inhibit passengers from using HSR and limit their accessibility to the service, and to propose some solutions and interventions. The study utilizes an online survey comprising a set of stated preference and revealed preference questions. A total of 3655 responses were collected, of which 3353 responses were complete and useful. A key finding is that comfort is proven to be the most favourable factor for using HSR, followed by travel time and reliability. Another finding is that the economic exclusion followed by the geographical exclusion is prevailing across different age and monthly income groups of non-HSR users. Those who have the lowest income and the elderly experience the strongest levels of economic exclusion. Moreover, physical, time-based, and fear-based exclusions are also notable. To create a modal shift from other modes to HSR and allow more groups to access the service, HSR should be competitive in terms of affordability and accessibility. Possible solutions and policy interventions that may help to tackle categories of social exclusion in China are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Transportation Journal
Open Transportation Journal Social Sciences-Transportation
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信