超越黑人社区痴呆症护理的不公平:最大限度地提高家庭护理独立性协调计划的经验教训

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
D. Sloan, D. Johnston, C. Fabius, Tabitha Pyatt, Inga M Antonsdottir, Melissa Reuland, Morgan Spliedt, Quincy M. Samus
{"title":"超越黑人社区痴呆症护理的不公平:最大限度地提高家庭护理独立性协调计划的经验教训","authors":"D. Sloan, D. Johnston, C. Fabius, Tabitha Pyatt, Inga M Antonsdottir, Melissa Reuland, Morgan Spliedt, Quincy M. Samus","doi":"10.1177/14713012221085808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose We examine care partners’ experience of the Maximizing Independence at Home (MIND) intervention, a multicomponent, home-based dementia care coordination program designed to provide high quality, wholistic care coordination for people and families living with dementia. The goal of the study was to understand 1. the unique dementia-related needs of Black care partners and barriers and challenges to caregiving experienced within the Black community, 2. perceived benefits of the MIND program, and 3. ways to improve the program and make it more culturally responsive to the Black community. Method We conducted three focus groups totaling 20 care partners of people living with dementia; who participated in the MIND intervention (2014–2019); all Black/African American and English speaking. Verbatim transcriptions were independently analyzed line-by-line by two coders using inductive approaches. Findings Participants noted three overarching themes related to dementia care needs and challenges in the Black community: difficulty finding and accessing dementia information and relevant services and supports; familial conflict/lack of sibling and familial support; and lack of effective communication about dementia within Black Communities. Regarding MIND at home program benefits, four themes emerged: 1. perceived to help locate resources (formal and informal); 2. provided care partners an opportunity for socialization and interaction; 3. included comprehensive assessments and helpful linked information; and 4. resulted in a “much needed break for care partners.” Increased diversity of the MIND program personnel, greater clarity and consistency in MIND program promotion, and better communications were themes for how the program could be improved. Conclusion Care partners participating in the MIND program perceived common benefits in aspects related to care for the persons living with dementia as well as benefits to themselves, believed the program addressed important challenges and gaps in education, services, and social support, and could be enhanced in its delivery and cultural responsiveness.","PeriodicalId":51413,"journal":{"name":"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcending inequities in dementia care in Black communities: Lessons from the maximizing independence at home care coordination program\",\"authors\":\"D. Sloan, D. Johnston, C. Fabius, Tabitha Pyatt, Inga M Antonsdottir, Melissa Reuland, Morgan Spliedt, Quincy M. Samus\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14713012221085808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose We examine care partners’ experience of the Maximizing Independence at Home (MIND) intervention, a multicomponent, home-based dementia care coordination program designed to provide high quality, wholistic care coordination for people and families living with dementia. The goal of the study was to understand 1. the unique dementia-related needs of Black care partners and barriers and challenges to caregiving experienced within the Black community, 2. perceived benefits of the MIND program, and 3. ways to improve the program and make it more culturally responsive to the Black community. Method We conducted three focus groups totaling 20 care partners of people living with dementia; who participated in the MIND intervention (2014–2019); all Black/African American and English speaking. Verbatim transcriptions were independently analyzed line-by-line by two coders using inductive approaches. Findings Participants noted three overarching themes related to dementia care needs and challenges in the Black community: difficulty finding and accessing dementia information and relevant services and supports; familial conflict/lack of sibling and familial support; and lack of effective communication about dementia within Black Communities. Regarding MIND at home program benefits, four themes emerged: 1. perceived to help locate resources (formal and informal); 2. provided care partners an opportunity for socialization and interaction; 3. included comprehensive assessments and helpful linked information; and 4. resulted in a “much needed break for care partners.” Increased diversity of the MIND program personnel, greater clarity and consistency in MIND program promotion, and better communications were themes for how the program could be improved. Conclusion Care partners participating in the MIND program perceived common benefits in aspects related to care for the persons living with dementia as well as benefits to themselves, believed the program addressed important challenges and gaps in education, services, and social support, and could be enhanced in its delivery and cultural responsiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012221085808\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012221085808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:我们研究了护理伙伴在最大化家庭独立性(MIND)干预中的经验,这是一个多成分的、以家庭为基础的痴呆症护理协调项目,旨在为痴呆症患者和家庭提供高质量的整体护理协调。这项研究的目的是了解1。2.黑人护理伙伴的独特痴呆症相关需求以及黑人社区护理经历的障碍和挑战。2 .意识项目的感知利益;如何改进该项目,使其在文化上更能反映黑人社区。方法采用3个焦点组,共20名痴呆患者的护理伙伴;参与MIND干预(2014-2019);都是说英语的黑人/非裔美国人。由两名编码器使用归纳方法逐行独立分析逐字转录。参与者注意到与黑人社区痴呆症护理需求和挑战相关的三个总体主题:难以找到和获取痴呆症信息以及相关服务和支持;家庭冲突/缺乏兄弟姐妹和家庭支持;以及黑人社区缺乏关于痴呆症的有效沟通。关于家庭心理项目的好处,出现了四个主题:被认为有助于找到资源(正式和非正式);2. 为护理伙伴提供社会化和互动的机会;3.包括全面的评估和有用的链接信息;和4。导致“护理伙伴急需休息”。增加MIND项目人员的多样性,提高MIND项目推广的清晰度和一致性,以及更好的沟通是如何改进该项目的主题。参与MIND项目的护理合作伙伴认为,在痴呆症患者的护理和自身受益方面,该项目都有共同的好处,他们认为该项目解决了教育、服务和社会支持方面的重大挑战和差距,并可以在交付和文化响应方面得到加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcending inequities in dementia care in Black communities: Lessons from the maximizing independence at home care coordination program
Purpose We examine care partners’ experience of the Maximizing Independence at Home (MIND) intervention, a multicomponent, home-based dementia care coordination program designed to provide high quality, wholistic care coordination for people and families living with dementia. The goal of the study was to understand 1. the unique dementia-related needs of Black care partners and barriers and challenges to caregiving experienced within the Black community, 2. perceived benefits of the MIND program, and 3. ways to improve the program and make it more culturally responsive to the Black community. Method We conducted three focus groups totaling 20 care partners of people living with dementia; who participated in the MIND intervention (2014–2019); all Black/African American and English speaking. Verbatim transcriptions were independently analyzed line-by-line by two coders using inductive approaches. Findings Participants noted three overarching themes related to dementia care needs and challenges in the Black community: difficulty finding and accessing dementia information and relevant services and supports; familial conflict/lack of sibling and familial support; and lack of effective communication about dementia within Black Communities. Regarding MIND at home program benefits, four themes emerged: 1. perceived to help locate resources (formal and informal); 2. provided care partners an opportunity for socialization and interaction; 3. included comprehensive assessments and helpful linked information; and 4. resulted in a “much needed break for care partners.” Increased diversity of the MIND program personnel, greater clarity and consistency in MIND program promotion, and better communications were themes for how the program could be improved. Conclusion Care partners participating in the MIND program perceived common benefits in aspects related to care for the persons living with dementia as well as benefits to themselves, believed the program addressed important challenges and gaps in education, services, and social support, and could be enhanced in its delivery and cultural responsiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Dementia acts as a major forum for social research of direct relevance to improving the quality of life and quality of care for people with dementia and their families. For the first time an international research journal is available for academics and practitioners that has as its primary paradigm the lived experience of dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信