虚假自由:南北战争期间纳什维尔反政府营地的联邦家长主义态度

Indraneel Pai
{"title":"虚假自由:南北战争期间纳什维尔反政府营地的联邦家长主义态度","authors":"Indraneel Pai","doi":"10.15695/vurj.v12i1.5274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"            As Union forces continued to secure victories in the Western Theatre of the American Civil War and reclaim, by force, the seceded lands of the Confederacy, one question persisted, particularly in Tennessee: what was to be done with the liberated slaves? Slaves would not be formally freed in Tennessee until the Battle of Nashville in 1864, and even then, the integration of freedmen into the rebuilding South proved to be a daunting task. Most prominent and immediate movement towards that end was the development of contraband camps -- so named because slaves were still considered by the Union to be “contraband” confiscated from the South during the war. However, with the chronic underfunding and lack of care put into these camps, the contraband slaves in Tennessee suffered an existence so miserable at the refugee encampments that freedmen were little better off with the Union forces than they were in Southern plantations. This paper seeks to show how, although the Union’s treatment of the freedmen was marginally better than that of the Southern plantation owners, their failures to adequately provide blacks in contraband camps with the necessary help to integrate them into American society was directly responsible for the asymmetric development of black and white communities in Tennessee. ","PeriodicalId":93630,"journal":{"name":"Vanderbilt undergraduate research journal : VURJ","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"False Freedom: Union Paternalistic Attitudes in Nashville’s Contraband Camps during the Civil War\",\"authors\":\"Indraneel Pai\",\"doi\":\"10.15695/vurj.v12i1.5274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"            As Union forces continued to secure victories in the Western Theatre of the American Civil War and reclaim, by force, the seceded lands of the Confederacy, one question persisted, particularly in Tennessee: what was to be done with the liberated slaves? Slaves would not be formally freed in Tennessee until the Battle of Nashville in 1864, and even then, the integration of freedmen into the rebuilding South proved to be a daunting task. Most prominent and immediate movement towards that end was the development of contraband camps -- so named because slaves were still considered by the Union to be “contraband” confiscated from the South during the war. However, with the chronic underfunding and lack of care put into these camps, the contraband slaves in Tennessee suffered an existence so miserable at the refugee encampments that freedmen were little better off with the Union forces than they were in Southern plantations. This paper seeks to show how, although the Union’s treatment of the freedmen was marginally better than that of the Southern plantation owners, their failures to adequately provide blacks in contraband camps with the necessary help to integrate them into American society was directly responsible for the asymmetric development of black and white communities in Tennessee. \",\"PeriodicalId\":93630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vanderbilt undergraduate research journal : VURJ\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vanderbilt undergraduate research journal : VURJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15695/vurj.v12i1.5274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vanderbilt undergraduate research journal : VURJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15695/vurj.v12i1.5274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当联邦军队继续在美国内战的西部战区取得胜利,并通过武力收复南部邦联的分离土地时,一个问题仍然存在,尤其是在田纳西州:如何处理解放的奴隶?直到1864年的纳什维尔战役,田纳西州的奴隶才被正式释放,即使在那时,将自由人融入重建的南方也是一项艰巨的任务。最突出和最直接的行动是开发违禁品营地——之所以这么命名,是因为奴隶仍然被联邦视为战争期间从南方没收的“违禁品”。然而,由于这些难民营长期资金不足,缺乏照顾,田纳西州的违禁奴隶在难民营里过着悲惨的生活,自由人在联邦军队的生活并不比在南方种植园好多少。本文试图表明,尽管联邦对自由人的待遇略好于南方种植园主,但他们未能为违禁营中的黑人提供必要的帮助,使他们融入美国社会,这是田纳西州黑人和白人社区不对称发展的直接原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
False Freedom: Union Paternalistic Attitudes in Nashville’s Contraband Camps during the Civil War
            As Union forces continued to secure victories in the Western Theatre of the American Civil War and reclaim, by force, the seceded lands of the Confederacy, one question persisted, particularly in Tennessee: what was to be done with the liberated slaves? Slaves would not be formally freed in Tennessee until the Battle of Nashville in 1864, and even then, the integration of freedmen into the rebuilding South proved to be a daunting task. Most prominent and immediate movement towards that end was the development of contraband camps -- so named because slaves were still considered by the Union to be “contraband” confiscated from the South during the war. However, with the chronic underfunding and lack of care put into these camps, the contraband slaves in Tennessee suffered an existence so miserable at the refugee encampments that freedmen were little better off with the Union forces than they were in Southern plantations. This paper seeks to show how, although the Union’s treatment of the freedmen was marginally better than that of the Southern plantation owners, their failures to adequately provide blacks in contraband camps with the necessary help to integrate them into American society was directly responsible for the asymmetric development of black and white communities in Tennessee. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信