《对食物厌恶性的思考的变化》,āhārepatikūlasaññā:规范,Theravāda, Sarvāstivāda和Mahāyāna形式

IF 0.6 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
M. Kong
{"title":"《对食物厌恶性的思考的变化》,āhārepatikūlasaññā:规范,Theravāda, Sarvāstivāda和Mahāyāna形式","authors":"M. Kong","doi":"10.1080/14639947.2019.1599568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores the changing treatment of a meditation practice, the contemplation of the repulsiveness of food, āhārepaṭikūlasaññā, from its presence in lists of saññā in canonical texts to its detailed explanation in post-canonical texts of the first millennium CE. We observe two main developments: the limitation in the benefits attributed to the practice within commentarial-period Theravada, and two entirely divergent branches in the way the practice is treated. In the Visuddhimagga of Theravada Buddhism, we see a somewhat practical approach that identifies the unpleasant aspects of the monk’s experience of seeking, eating, digesting and excreting food, and takes them as the focus of a 10-stage meditation practice. In the Sarvāstivāda texts, we see a conceptual aversion created by the association of specific food items with other items treated as impure within meditation practice. This articles explores all these divergences, drawing conclusions about what this says in terms of the understanding of food in these two branches.","PeriodicalId":45708,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Buddhism","volume":"20 1","pages":"95 - 110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14639947.2019.1599568","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variations in the Contemplation of the Repulsiveness of Food, āhārepatikūlasaññā: Canonical, Theravāda, Sarvāstivāda and Mahāyāna Forms\",\"authors\":\"M. Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14639947.2019.1599568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article explores the changing treatment of a meditation practice, the contemplation of the repulsiveness of food, āhārepaṭikūlasaññā, from its presence in lists of saññā in canonical texts to its detailed explanation in post-canonical texts of the first millennium CE. We observe two main developments: the limitation in the benefits attributed to the practice within commentarial-period Theravada, and two entirely divergent branches in the way the practice is treated. In the Visuddhimagga of Theravada Buddhism, we see a somewhat practical approach that identifies the unpleasant aspects of the monk’s experience of seeking, eating, digesting and excreting food, and takes them as the focus of a 10-stage meditation practice. In the Sarvāstivāda texts, we see a conceptual aversion created by the association of specific food items with other items treated as impure within meditation practice. This articles explores all these divergences, drawing conclusions about what this says in terms of the understanding of food in these two branches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Buddhism\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"95 - 110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14639947.2019.1599568\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Buddhism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2019.1599568\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Buddhism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2019.1599568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文探讨了冥想练习的变化方式,对食物的排斥性的沉思,āhārepaṭikālasaññā,从它出现在规范文本中的sañíā列表中,到它在公元前一千年的后规范文本中得到详细解释。我们观察到两个主要的发展:上座部时期的实践所带来的利益的限制,以及对待实践的两个完全不同的分支。在上座部佛教的Visuddhimagga中,我们看到了一种有点实用的方法,它确定了僧侣在寻找、进食、消化和排泄食物的经历中令人不快的方面,并将其作为10个阶段冥想练习的重点。在Sarvāstivāda文本中,我们看到了一种概念上的厌恶,这种厌恶是由特定的食物与冥想练习中被视为不纯的其他食物相关联而产生的。这篇文章探讨了所有这些分歧,得出了关于这两个分支对食物的理解的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variations in the Contemplation of the Repulsiveness of Food, āhārepatikūlasaññā: Canonical, Theravāda, Sarvāstivāda and Mahāyāna Forms
ABSTRACT This article explores the changing treatment of a meditation practice, the contemplation of the repulsiveness of food, āhārepaṭikūlasaññā, from its presence in lists of saññā in canonical texts to its detailed explanation in post-canonical texts of the first millennium CE. We observe two main developments: the limitation in the benefits attributed to the practice within commentarial-period Theravada, and two entirely divergent branches in the way the practice is treated. In the Visuddhimagga of Theravada Buddhism, we see a somewhat practical approach that identifies the unpleasant aspects of the monk’s experience of seeking, eating, digesting and excreting food, and takes them as the focus of a 10-stage meditation practice. In the Sarvāstivāda texts, we see a conceptual aversion created by the association of specific food items with other items treated as impure within meditation practice. This articles explores all these divergences, drawing conclusions about what this says in terms of the understanding of food in these two branches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信