联合图作为观察夫妻关系的工具:夫妻亲密距离量表(CCDS)的发展

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sharon Snir , Sharon Egozi , Lotem Svorai , Ruth Tuch , Or Shalev
{"title":"联合图作为观察夫妻关系的工具:夫妻亲密距离量表(CCDS)的发展","authors":"Sharon Snir ,&nbsp;Sharon Egozi ,&nbsp;Lotem Svorai ,&nbsp;Ruth Tuch ,&nbsp;Or Shalev","doi":"10.1016/j.aip.2023.102065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study describes the development of the <em>Couples Closeness Distance Scale (CCDS)</em> a quantitative tool for evaluation of joint drawing tasks informed by attachment theory concepts of closeness and distance and art therapy-based phenomenological theory. The scale development process was based on the observer version of the Therapeutic-Distance-Scale (TDS-O). Fourteen romantically involved couples drew together on a shared sheet of paper twice, and then took part in a joint interview. Pictorial phenomena that may indicate issues of distance and closeness were identified by a five-member analysis team, and then added to the TDS items. During the process, adjustments were made in the wording of some of the TDS items for the purpose of the current scale. In the process of formulating the items, the ICC was calculated, and certain items were redefined for suitability and accuracy. The final version of the CCDS includes four dimensions: Too Distant (<em>ICC</em>0.91–0.96), Too Close (<em>ICC</em>0.66–0.92), Autonomy (<em>ICC</em>0.70–0.81), and Engagement- Appropriate Closeness (<em>ICC</em>0.75–0.97). The use of the scale is demonstrated by means of three examples. Potential uses and limitations of the scale are presented in the discussion section.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47590,"journal":{"name":"Arts in Psychotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joint drawings as a tool for observing couple relationships: Development of the, Couples’ Closeness-Distance Scale (CCDS)\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Snir ,&nbsp;Sharon Egozi ,&nbsp;Lotem Svorai ,&nbsp;Ruth Tuch ,&nbsp;Or Shalev\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aip.2023.102065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study describes the development of the <em>Couples Closeness Distance Scale (CCDS)</em> a quantitative tool for evaluation of joint drawing tasks informed by attachment theory concepts of closeness and distance and art therapy-based phenomenological theory. The scale development process was based on the observer version of the Therapeutic-Distance-Scale (TDS-O). Fourteen romantically involved couples drew together on a shared sheet of paper twice, and then took part in a joint interview. Pictorial phenomena that may indicate issues of distance and closeness were identified by a five-member analysis team, and then added to the TDS items. During the process, adjustments were made in the wording of some of the TDS items for the purpose of the current scale. In the process of formulating the items, the ICC was calculated, and certain items were redefined for suitability and accuracy. The final version of the CCDS includes four dimensions: Too Distant (<em>ICC</em>0.91–0.96), Too Close (<em>ICC</em>0.66–0.92), Autonomy (<em>ICC</em>0.70–0.81), and Engagement- Appropriate Closeness (<em>ICC</em>0.75–0.97). The use of the scale is demonstrated by means of three examples. Potential uses and limitations of the scale are presented in the discussion section.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arts in Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arts in Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197455623000722\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts in Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197455623000722","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究描述了夫妻亲密距离量表(CCDS)的发展,这是一种定量工具,用于评估联合绘画任务,该工具由依恋理论的亲密和距离概念和基于艺术治疗的现象学理论提供信息。量表的开发过程基于观察者版的治疗距离量表(TDS-O)。14对恋爱中的情侣在一张纸上画了两次,然后一起接受采访。一个由五人组成的分析小组确定了可能表明距离和接近问题的图像现象,然后将其添加到TDS项目中。在这一过程中,为了现行比额表的目的,对一些技术发展项目的措辞作了调整。在制订项目的过程中,计算了国际商会,并为适当性和准确性重新定义了某些项目。最终版本的CCDS包括四个维度:距离过远(ICC0.91-0.96),距离过近(ICC0.66-0.92),自主性(ICC0.70-0.81)和参与-适当的亲密度(ICC0.75-0.97)。通过三个例子来说明音阶的使用。该秤的潜在用途和限制在讨论部分提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Joint drawings as a tool for observing couple relationships: Development of the, Couples’ Closeness-Distance Scale (CCDS)

This study describes the development of the Couples Closeness Distance Scale (CCDS) a quantitative tool for evaluation of joint drawing tasks informed by attachment theory concepts of closeness and distance and art therapy-based phenomenological theory. The scale development process was based on the observer version of the Therapeutic-Distance-Scale (TDS-O). Fourteen romantically involved couples drew together on a shared sheet of paper twice, and then took part in a joint interview. Pictorial phenomena that may indicate issues of distance and closeness were identified by a five-member analysis team, and then added to the TDS items. During the process, adjustments were made in the wording of some of the TDS items for the purpose of the current scale. In the process of formulating the items, the ICC was calculated, and certain items were redefined for suitability and accuracy. The final version of the CCDS includes four dimensions: Too Distant (ICC0.91–0.96), Too Close (ICC0.66–0.92), Autonomy (ICC0.70–0.81), and Engagement- Appropriate Closeness (ICC0.75–0.97). The use of the scale is demonstrated by means of three examples. Potential uses and limitations of the scale are presented in the discussion section.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: The Arts in Psychotherapy is a dynamic, contemporary journal publishing evidence-based research, expert opinion, theoretical positions, and case material on a wide range of topics intersecting the fields of mental health and creative arts therapies. It is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing 5 issues annually. Papers are welcomed from researchers and practitioners in the fields of art, dance/movement, drama, music, and poetry psychotherapy, as well as expressive and creative arts therapy, neuroscience, psychiatry, education, allied health, and psychology that aim to engage high level theoretical concepts with the rigor of professional practice. The journal welcomes contributions that present new and emergent knowledge about the role of the arts in healthcare, and engage a critical discourse relevant to an international readership that can inform the development of new services and the refinement of existing policies and practices. There is no restriction on research methods and review papers are welcome. From time to time the journal publishes special issues on topics warranting a distinctive focus relevant to the stated goals and scope of the publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信