{"title":"自然智能对人工智能的反击(对雷·库兹韦尔(Ray Kurzweil)的《如何创造思维》(How to Create a Mind)的争议性回应)","authors":"A. Fatenkov","doi":"10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-3-172-183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By turning to geometric metaphors, the author defends the naturally based intelligence and – in the context of analysing Ray Kurzweil’s conception – criticises the artificial intelligence. The focus is on the ability of man and machine to solve the so-called unsolvable problems. This issue is discussed in conjunction with the issues of hierarchy, homogeneity and heterogeneity, contradiction and analogy, meaning and information. Arguments are given to support the following ideas: 1) digital technologies do not overcome the fundamental limitations of analogue technologies, thus AI capabilities are also irreparably limited; 2) the natural intelligence works in an original way (not by analogy), so there can be no insoluble theoretical problems for it; 3) in a healthy human brain, there is neither excess nor deficiency, it does not need artificial improvement; 4) incomplete actualisation of the brain potential is not a weakness, but a strength and special feature of the human mind; 5) the theory of artificial intelligence is characterised by excessive reductionism and fetishization of speed.","PeriodicalId":41795,"journal":{"name":"Filosofskii Zhurnal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural intelligence in a counterattack against artificial intelligence (a polemical response to “How to Create a Mind” by Ray Kurzweil)\",\"authors\":\"A. Fatenkov\",\"doi\":\"10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-3-172-183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By turning to geometric metaphors, the author defends the naturally based intelligence and – in the context of analysing Ray Kurzweil’s conception – criticises the artificial intelligence. The focus is on the ability of man and machine to solve the so-called unsolvable problems. This issue is discussed in conjunction with the issues of hierarchy, homogeneity and heterogeneity, contradiction and analogy, meaning and information. Arguments are given to support the following ideas: 1) digital technologies do not overcome the fundamental limitations of analogue technologies, thus AI capabilities are also irreparably limited; 2) the natural intelligence works in an original way (not by analogy), so there can be no insoluble theoretical problems for it; 3) in a healthy human brain, there is neither excess nor deficiency, it does not need artificial improvement; 4) incomplete actualisation of the brain potential is not a weakness, but a strength and special feature of the human mind; 5) the theory of artificial intelligence is characterised by excessive reductionism and fetishization of speed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filosofskii Zhurnal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filosofskii Zhurnal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-3-172-183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-3-172-183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Natural intelligence in a counterattack against artificial intelligence (a polemical response to “How to Create a Mind” by Ray Kurzweil)
By turning to geometric metaphors, the author defends the naturally based intelligence and – in the context of analysing Ray Kurzweil’s conception – criticises the artificial intelligence. The focus is on the ability of man and machine to solve the so-called unsolvable problems. This issue is discussed in conjunction with the issues of hierarchy, homogeneity and heterogeneity, contradiction and analogy, meaning and information. Arguments are given to support the following ideas: 1) digital technologies do not overcome the fundamental limitations of analogue technologies, thus AI capabilities are also irreparably limited; 2) the natural intelligence works in an original way (not by analogy), so there can be no insoluble theoretical problems for it; 3) in a healthy human brain, there is neither excess nor deficiency, it does not need artificial improvement; 4) incomplete actualisation of the brain potential is not a weakness, but a strength and special feature of the human mind; 5) the theory of artificial intelligence is characterised by excessive reductionism and fetishization of speed.