心灵之镜:在《保存》和《新手教师》中引发批判性反思

Q2 Social Sciences
Dianna Gahlsdorf Terrell, Diana Sherman
{"title":"心灵之镜:在《保存》和《新手教师》中引发批判性反思","authors":"Dianna Gahlsdorf Terrell, Diana Sherman","doi":"10.1080/01626620.2022.2036268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This qualitative case study responds to calls for research on the ways critical reflection develops in preservice and novice teachers. While evaluating capacity to reflect is a dominant practice in teacher education, few studies explore empirically how different factors impact teachers’ reflection. Building from earlier research that conceptualized a typology that included four levels of reflective thinking, this study explores how different factors spur the highest form of reflection identified by the literature, critical reflection, through a multi-method approach involving several sets of data across nine cases of learning to teach. Findings from within-case analyses suggest some habits of critical reflection transfer across contexts, while others appear to be contextually dependent. Shifts in teaching contexts and elicitation practices appear to drive the quality and quantity of critical reflection suggesting that some habits of reflection can be elicited and reinforced by teacher educators regardless of context.","PeriodicalId":52183,"journal":{"name":"Action in Teacher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mirror of Mind: Eliciting Critical Reflections in Preservice and Novice Teachers\",\"authors\":\"Dianna Gahlsdorf Terrell, Diana Sherman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01626620.2022.2036268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This qualitative case study responds to calls for research on the ways critical reflection develops in preservice and novice teachers. While evaluating capacity to reflect is a dominant practice in teacher education, few studies explore empirically how different factors impact teachers’ reflection. Building from earlier research that conceptualized a typology that included four levels of reflective thinking, this study explores how different factors spur the highest form of reflection identified by the literature, critical reflection, through a multi-method approach involving several sets of data across nine cases of learning to teach. Findings from within-case analyses suggest some habits of critical reflection transfer across contexts, while others appear to be contextually dependent. Shifts in teaching contexts and elicitation practices appear to drive the quality and quantity of critical reflection suggesting that some habits of reflection can be elicited and reinforced by teacher educators regardless of context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Action in Teacher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Action in Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2022.2036268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action in Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2022.2036268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本定性案例研究回应了对职前教师和新手教师批判性反思发展方式的研究呼吁。尽管评估反思能力是教师教育中的一种主要做法,但很少有研究从经验上探讨不同因素如何影响教师的反思。本研究建立在早期研究的基础上,该研究概念化了一种包括四个层次的反思思维的类型学,探讨了不同因素如何通过涉及九个学习教学案例的多组数据的多方法方法激发文献中确定的最高形式的反思,即批判性反思。案例内部分析的结果表明,一些批判性反思的习惯会在不同的背景下转移,而另一些则似乎依赖于背景。教学情境和启发实践的转变似乎推动了批判性反思的质量和数量,这表明教师教育者可以在不考虑情境的情况下激发和强化一些反思习惯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mirror of Mind: Eliciting Critical Reflections in Preservice and Novice Teachers
ABSTRACT This qualitative case study responds to calls for research on the ways critical reflection develops in preservice and novice teachers. While evaluating capacity to reflect is a dominant practice in teacher education, few studies explore empirically how different factors impact teachers’ reflection. Building from earlier research that conceptualized a typology that included four levels of reflective thinking, this study explores how different factors spur the highest form of reflection identified by the literature, critical reflection, through a multi-method approach involving several sets of data across nine cases of learning to teach. Findings from within-case analyses suggest some habits of critical reflection transfer across contexts, while others appear to be contextually dependent. Shifts in teaching contexts and elicitation practices appear to drive the quality and quantity of critical reflection suggesting that some habits of reflection can be elicited and reinforced by teacher educators regardless of context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Action in Teacher Education
Action in Teacher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信