双袋式过滤系统去除危险垃圾焚烧烟气中PCDD/Fs的影响因素预测

Yanan Li, Qi Liu, Minghui Tang, Fei Wang, Shengyong Lu, Makwarimba Chengetai Portia, Yong Chi
{"title":"双袋式过滤系统去除危险垃圾焚烧烟气中PCDD/Fs的影响因素预测","authors":"Yanan Li,&nbsp;Qi Liu,&nbsp;Minghui Tang,&nbsp;Fei Wang,&nbsp;Shengyong Lu,&nbsp;Makwarimba Chengetai Portia,&nbsp;Yong Chi","doi":"10.1007/s42768-022-00126-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The dual  bag filter (DBF) system is a new polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) emission control technology that has more efficient (PCDD/Fs) removal performance,  a higher activated carbon utilization rate and less activated carbon consumption compared with the traditional single bag filter system. Moreover, few studies have been relevant to the mechanism of the PCDD/Fs removal process in the DBF system, and the selection of operating conditions of the DBF system lacks an academic basis. This study established a PCDD/Fs removal efficiency model of activated carbon injection combined bag filter (ACI+DBF) system for hazardous waste incineration flue gas and predicted  the crucial effect factors. New adsorption coefficients <i>k</i><sub>1</sub>=532,145 Nm<sup>3</sup>/(mol s) and <i>k</i><sub>2</sub>=45 Nm<sup>3</sup>/(mol s), and the relationship expression between the number of available adsorption positions of recycled AC (<i>A</i><sub>AC′</sub>) and cycle times (<i>n</i>) are proposed in the model. The results verify that the model error was below 5%. In addition, the PCDD/Fs removal efficiency model predicts that in a certain range, the PCDD/Fs removal efficiency increases with increasing activated carbon injection concentration. The best cycle number of activated carbon was less than 3, and the ratio of circulating activated carbon to fresh activated carbon in second bag filter (SBF) should be controlled at 7–8.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":807,"journal":{"name":"Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy","volume":"5 2","pages":"177 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42768-022-00126-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting effect factors of dual bag filter system for PCDD/Fs removal from hazardous waste incineration flue gas\",\"authors\":\"Yanan Li,&nbsp;Qi Liu,&nbsp;Minghui Tang,&nbsp;Fei Wang,&nbsp;Shengyong Lu,&nbsp;Makwarimba Chengetai Portia,&nbsp;Yong Chi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42768-022-00126-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The dual  bag filter (DBF) system is a new polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) emission control technology that has more efficient (PCDD/Fs) removal performance,  a higher activated carbon utilization rate and less activated carbon consumption compared with the traditional single bag filter system. Moreover, few studies have been relevant to the mechanism of the PCDD/Fs removal process in the DBF system, and the selection of operating conditions of the DBF system lacks an academic basis. This study established a PCDD/Fs removal efficiency model of activated carbon injection combined bag filter (ACI+DBF) system for hazardous waste incineration flue gas and predicted  the crucial effect factors. New adsorption coefficients <i>k</i><sub>1</sub>=532,145 Nm<sup>3</sup>/(mol s) and <i>k</i><sub>2</sub>=45 Nm<sup>3</sup>/(mol s), and the relationship expression between the number of available adsorption positions of recycled AC (<i>A</i><sub>AC′</sub>) and cycle times (<i>n</i>) are proposed in the model. The results verify that the model error was below 5%. In addition, the PCDD/Fs removal efficiency model predicts that in a certain range, the PCDD/Fs removal efficiency increases with increasing activated carbon injection concentration. The best cycle number of activated carbon was less than 3, and the ratio of circulating activated carbon to fresh activated carbon in second bag filter (SBF) should be controlled at 7–8.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"177 - 187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42768-022-00126-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42768-022-00126-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42768-022-00126-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双袋除尘器(DBF)系统是一种新型的多氯二苯并对二恶英和多氯二苯并呋喃(PCDD/Fs)排放控制技术,与传统的单袋除尘器系统相比,具有更高效(PCDD/Fs)的去除性能、更高的活性炭利用率和更少的活性炭消耗。此外,关于DBF系统中PCDD/Fs去除过程机理的研究较少,DBF系统运行条件的选择也缺乏理论依据。本研究建立了活性炭喷射袋式除尘器(ACI+DBF)系统对危险垃圾焚烧烟气中PCDD/Fs的去除效率模型,并对关键影响因素进行了预测。在模型中提出了新的吸附系数k1=532,145 Nm3/(mol s)和k2=45 Nm3/(mol s),以及循环次数(n)与再生AC的有效吸附位置数(AAC’)之间的关系表达式。结果表明,模型误差在5%以下。此外,PCDD/Fs去除效率模型预测,在一定范围内,PCDD/Fs去除效率随着活性炭注入浓度的增加而增加。活性炭的最佳循环次数小于3次,二级袋式过滤器循环活性炭与新鲜活性炭的比例应控制在7-8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predicting effect factors of dual bag filter system for PCDD/Fs removal from hazardous waste incineration flue gas

Predicting effect factors of dual bag filter system for PCDD/Fs removal from hazardous waste incineration flue gas

The dual  bag filter (DBF) system is a new polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) emission control technology that has more efficient (PCDD/Fs) removal performance,  a higher activated carbon utilization rate and less activated carbon consumption compared with the traditional single bag filter system. Moreover, few studies have been relevant to the mechanism of the PCDD/Fs removal process in the DBF system, and the selection of operating conditions of the DBF system lacks an academic basis. This study established a PCDD/Fs removal efficiency model of activated carbon injection combined bag filter (ACI+DBF) system for hazardous waste incineration flue gas and predicted  the crucial effect factors. New adsorption coefficients k1=532,145 Nm3/(mol s) and k2=45 Nm3/(mol s), and the relationship expression between the number of available adsorption positions of recycled AC (AAC′) and cycle times (n) are proposed in the model. The results verify that the model error was below 5%. In addition, the PCDD/Fs removal efficiency model predicts that in a certain range, the PCDD/Fs removal efficiency increases with increasing activated carbon injection concentration. The best cycle number of activated carbon was less than 3, and the ratio of circulating activated carbon to fresh activated carbon in second bag filter (SBF) should be controlled at 7–8.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信